Jump to content
  • entries
    657
  • comments
    2,692
  • views
    898,498

Stay Frosty, Part 10


SpiceWare

1,235 views

Last time around, while visiting family for Thanksgiving, I'd implemented a preliminary starfield. I'd originally tried doing so using missile 1, but it didn't work (in Stella) so I changed it to use missile 0. In and of itself that was fine, but missile 0 was used for the melt trail so needed to be repositioned after displaying the stars. As a quick workaround I just added 2 extra scanlines to reposition missile 0, which had bumped the scanline count from 262 to 264.


 

Stella Debug Colors


blogentry-3056-0-88601600-1544830931.png




 

Missile 0 Stars (orange)


blogentry-3056-0-28828900-1544830919_thumb.png


When I posted about the stars, batari came back with:


We tried the starfield trick last year and the emulation is very inaccurate. Stella is only designed to emulate the exact conditions from Cosmic Ark, not the general starfield trick.


So I changed it over to use the ball and removed the missile 0 reposition. (Stella's been greatly enhanced since then and now accurately emulates the starfield trick with all objects).



 

Ball stars(light blue)


blogentry-3056-0-66737300-1544830893_thumb.png


Star Test ROMs:
frostyStarTestNTSC.bin
frostyStarTestPAL.bin

That worked, though Albert replied back with:


I just tested it on a four switch with a Commodore 1702 monitor and it matches your screenshot but it's very flickery, so much so that it's distracting.

I agreed, the problem was in order to draw enough stars I was having to flicker them at 15 Hz. After further discussion I ended up reverting to my original implementation that used missile 1, reduced flicker to 30 Hz, then used 2-copies-wide on one frame and 2-copies-medium on the other to add additional stars. Alternating copies between wide and medium solved a problem with the stars being too repetitive in their layout.



 


Missile 1 Stars (green)
blogentry-3056-0-93145500-1544830923_thumb.png


Besides that I revamped the controls to use left-right and fire for jump, as well as added preliminary inertia.

ROMs:
frosty071123NTSC.bin
frosty071123PAL.bin

Source:
sf_source071123.zip

Blog entry covers November 23, 2007

  • Like 5

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

 

 

Hi  @SpiceWare !!

 

 

thank you so much for your work like always.

 

I'm trying to compile this source code sf_source071123 on linux ubuntu with DASM 2.20.14

 

I'm using this command line to do the job:

 

dasm frosty.asm -lfrosty.lst -f3 -v5 -ofrosty.bin

 

and i get:

 

frosty.asm (473): error: Illegal forced Addressing mode on 'sta'.
frosty.asm (1286): error: Illegal forced Addressing mode on 'sta'.

Fatal assembly error: Source is not resolvable.

 

Am I doing or writing something wrong?

all it's in the same directory, vcs.h, macro.h, graphics.h, frosty.asm

 

ty in advance.

Edited by zilog_z80a
Link to comment

 

@Thomas Jentzsch

wait, the horizontal reposition has a sta.wx

 

i have removed the x.

 

what has changed?

now the compiler works, must i do something to replace that x for other thing?

 

works the same sta.wx than sta.w with just one dummie?

 

i know that .w is some kind of delay.

Edited by zilog_z80a
Link to comment

The problem is, that the lasted version of DASM doesn't like force operators which are repeated by the instruction (e.g. sta.wx address,x). This is a known bug which will be fixed soon. A force operator can be used to e.g change a 4 cycle ZP,x write into a 5 cycle abs,x write. And timing is crucial for a 2600 ROM, especially when it comes to positioning of a sprite.

 

A workaround for current DASM is to remove ",x" in "sta.wx address,x" or to revert to an earlier DASM version.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Thomas Jentzsch said:

The problem is, that the lasted version of DASM doesn't like force operators which are repeated by the instruction (e.g. sta.wx address,x). This is a known bug which will be fixed soon. A force operator can be used to e.g change a 4 cycle ZP,x write into a 5 cycle abs,x write. And timing is crucial for a 2600 ROM, especially when it comes to positioning of a sprite.

 

A workaround for current DASM is to remove ",x" in "sta.wx address,x" or to revert to an earlier DASM version.

 

thanks so much.

 

cheers.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...