Jump to content
  • entries
    4,933
  • comments
    2,716
  • views
    1,807,428

analog tv > digital tv


atari2600land

469 views

I hope the government doesn't find this blog post. They're the ones who forced us to go digital. Why couldn't we have a choice? They're the ones who say frequent audio and video disruptions are better and LESS annoying than constant audio and video but with a fuzzy picture. Assholes. I remember the days of analog TV (it's kind of hard to forget a few years ago) when these stupid interruptions didn't happen, and TV was way better without it. Now these idiots come in and say "Even though the TV you have is just fine, we are forcing you to go digital and get a stupid box." And I think TV reception is WORSE than it was. Screw the "better picture" garbage, it's just not true if you don't have a digital TV to go along with it. And I really don't care about picture quality, either. If I can make out what is on the screen, it's fine. I don't need "way better" picture quality if I either have or don't have a TV set that can give it to me. What's next? The government telling us when we can and can't breathe? And I'm not joking, either.

3 Comments


Recommended Comments

Sometimes having a choice isn't a good thing - could you image the utter chaos if you got to choose which side of the street to drive on?

Link to comment

Hmm... The ATSC transition was all about $$. The conversion allowed the government to reduce the frequencies assigned to broadcast TV and then license ($$) the no longer used spectrum primarily to the mobile phone industry. The consumer electronics industry got the opportunity to sell new TVs to everyone and the broadcast electronics industry got the opportunity to sell new TV cameras and similar equipment to everyone. (And there's secondary and tertiary impacts too.)

 

As part of the frequency reallocation, almost all TV stations were moved out of low VHF (ch2-6) and in many cases out of VHF altogether and into the low UHF (13-51). This has several benefits including smaller UHF-only antennas and less problems of same channel interference over long distances (typical with VHF). Digital TV also has fewer problems with adjacent channel interference, which is good in densely populated areas.

 

However, as you've noticed, digital TV has similarities to FM radio. Great quality up until the sound disappears, the picture breaks up and your TV loses the signal entirely. The good news is a good quality antenna (i.e. the Channel Master CM4040 for indoor) may be enough to improve your reception. If you want more channels, you would need to put up an outdoor antenna.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...