roots.genoa

Actually, even though I wasn't convinced initially either, I think the rotating effect looks quite impressive now. And honestly, I find the graphics really good in general. That being said, this makes the gameplay even more depressing at the moment imho. I know it's not finished and things can still improve, but I'm not a fan of the silly special moves, especially involving projectiles since it's a brawler, not a shoot 'em up. It really looks rough and buggy, almost unplayable or at least not very fun for now. But I really hope I'm wrong.

When I advised you to stop creating topics and start replying to existing ones, I didn't mean you had to create a new account for that, given that's forbidden and have you banned from AtariAge. 😑

But as soon as Nall3k goes back home tonight:

And weirdos like me that played Xeno Crisis on Evercade, so the Genesis version with a SNES controller layout. 😎 I remember trying the game on a real Genesis, but don't remember if it used a 6-button controller or a 3-button one. I just remembered I found it hard to control, while I didn't have a lot of problems on Evercade.

I think what Mr Me is calling "harassment" is for instance when Beefy called the Amico shills Mr Me's "friends". Anyway, I'm more interested in evidence of Mr Me being one of the first to question the Amico... Of course it's harder when the topic is not there anymore. 😅

No, but I'm pretty sure there's one in there too, there are already quite a few of them. 😅 Since I'm used to check my unread posts stream, it's always weird to see half a dozen identical topics to cover every subforum.

Are there 7800 fans that are not interested in the 2600 at all? Just curious. 🤔

I won't tell it here publicly, sorry.

I don't want to derail this thread, but my point is precisely that this vision of modern gaming is really simplistic. Modern gaming has a lot more to offer than classic gaming had. I don't play online looter-shooters nor games with gambling (I have no idea what the 3rd thing is). But I understand why you could think that of modern gaming, since a few games tend to get all the media coverage unfortunately. I just think it's a little sad to limit oneself to classic gaming, but to each their own.

And ironically there's a well known homebrew publisher that used Game Maker to create prototypes of SNES games without disclosing it (afaik). 😔 Most of these games are still not available for some reason. 😅 Feel free to ignore me as well, Kirk, but remember that everyone else can read the posts you ignore and that doesn't make you look good, believe me.

Which is part of the (AtariAge) problem imho 😔

I think you're wrong about that, actually. Yes, we focus a lot on your weird punctuation, just because it's hard to ignore. Do you realize how hard is it sometimes to understand what you're trying to say because of that? BUT we also criticize your ideas because, to be honest, they're usually very debatable. Just look at the first post by Tanooki in that topic; he counters your three points one after another and that's it, he doesn't talk about your writing style at all. 🤷‍♂️ If I could give you one piece of advice, it would be to try to participate by replying to other topics instead of creating a lot of them (and only posting in them). I've been here for quite some time, posted a lot, but I only created ONE topic, and it didn't go very well. 😅 Creating a topic is kinda hard (except if it's to talk about a game you're developing for instance), because it highlights your opinion. So if people disagree, they will tear you apart. When you just post a reply to a topic you didn't create, people may just ignore you if they disagree. At first it was hard to me as well (English is not my native language either), but now I can even make other people laugh (willingly I mean) because I'm more familiar with AtariAge's culture and modern English language.

Let's be completely honest for a second. 😉 By the time you posted that link, you were labelled as one of the main Amico haters (wrongly or not, it doesn't matter here). So to be fair, the way you shared it without any question or derogatory comment (even calling it a "good opportunity" 🙄) was suspicious. And we all know why you shared it: just to remind Tommy of his promise of never using crowdfunding, like bojay said. So in a way, Tommy was right, he saw through you (you phony 😉), but having someone banned from a topic based on a hunch, given you didn't break any rule, was unacceptable imho. It's like punishing someone for a crime he hasn't committed yet. And the problem is it was the same for most people that got banned from that topic. A few of them were aggressive, sure, but most of us were only banned because Tommy suspected we might have a secret agenda or something.