-
Posts
148 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Store
Everything posted by Switch1995
-
https://www.ebay.com/itm/144765698725?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=iBuyvundR-G&sssrc=2349624&ssuid=QfU6nnIiRby&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY
-
Also VisiCalc and Lotus 1-2-3 in case @pixelpedant needs an “Electronic Worksheet” fix! Great YouTube channel dude
-
I haven’t been on this website for a few months: https://www.pcjs.org/software/pcx86/ Dune II emulation in the browser………yeah, I’m going to be real productive today
-
TI-GROMmy, the system GROM replacement
Switch1995 replied to speccery's topic in TI-99/4A Development
Answered my own question: >8000 Duplication of scratch pad RAM at >8300 - >83FF>8100 Dup. as above>8200 again>8300 Scratch Pad RAM -
TI-GROMmy, the system GROM replacement
Switch1995 replied to speccery's topic in TI-99/4A Development
Did the QI fully decode >8000 to >82FF? Are they just "four copies" of the same map? -
TI-GROMmy, the system GROM replacement
Switch1995 replied to speccery's topic in TI-99/4A Development
Hi @matthew180 I've been diving into your assembly posts and you mentioned: The value >8300 is used here because that represents the first address in the scratch pad RAM, which exists from >8300 to >83FF (256 bytes.) Actually there is a lot of waste in the memory-mapped devices in the 99/4A and the scratch pad RAM is not fully decoded, which means it will respond to memory address in these ranges: >8000 to >80FF >8100 to >81FF >8200 to >82FF >8300 to >83FF Each range is accessing the same memory, however it is pretty much universally accepted that the scratch pad should be addressed from >8300 to >83FF. Something I've always wanted to do is add real memory to each of those address ranges and give the 99/4A 1K of real 16-bit scratch pad RAM! But that's another day, another project. Would you envision a solution similar to GROMmy where a board would span across the two sockets that held the MCM6810Ps? -
I've got to be honest here. I've watched GPLHOW2A probably four times in the past couple of years. I've never moved past it because I didn't understand hardly any of it. I just watched GPLHOW2F and am eager to learn more. I really wish those videos were flipped. Or even better, GPLHOW2A redone as a slower version of GPLHOW2F with some explanation of the development environment/tools. Perhaps not a complete program, but snippets of code that shows XB CALLS and statements and their corresponding GPL. The way GPLHOW2F keeps the BASIC commented out above the new code is a great teaching tool.
-
Some casinos will pay 50-1 for the mini royal but they then pay the straight 5-1, which makes the overall odds worse for the player.
-
Mini Royal Flush...dealt in order....playing $100 a hand just after buy-in...and Dealer qualifies. Why can't this happen IRL???
-
I look at it in "tiers": There is the serious "I'm here to win money"/big money tier: Blackjack (0.28% house edge), Baccarat-bet on Banker (1.06%) and Craps-Pass/Come lines (1.41%) There is the "I'm here to have fun, probably lose, but maybe win" tier: Let It Ride (3.51%), Caribbean Stud (5.22%), Roulette-American (5.26%) and Three-Card Poker: even money on all three bets (5.32%) Then there is the "I'm a pure dreamer and am not expecting to win, only want a jackpot": Slots (~10-15%), Big Wheel (22.22%), Keno (25-29%)
-
Interesting. I thought the ACCEPT AT checked the value and just went back to the same line. I'll have to take a look. Thanks again for the feedback! I found the issue. When I renumbered my subprograms I broke some code that was already tested. The attached version will not allow you to enter a value outside of the min-max values. Thanks again for the catch. *If a moderator could swap this file with the initial post that would be awesome. Otherwise, the only issue is this value check. The game plays fine otherwise* THREECARD
-
House edge is 5.32%. About equal to American (double zero) roulette. Craps and Blackjack are much better games if you are trying to lose less money. https://wizardofodds.com/games/three-card-poker/
-
Hi ti99iuc, I'm so happy you are enjoying the game and no problem with adding to your database. Yes: In a real casino, the "Pair Plus" is optional. I took a bit of liberty to make it mandatory to make my payoff algorithm and "Display at" statements a bit simpler. Plus, I figured with fake money, people would want to gamble a bit! I also strategically made the minimum bankroll ($500) at least three times as large as the maximum bet ($100) to allow the main play loop to not crash from the start. In a real casino you could have a bankroll of $1010, put $1000 on the pair plus bet, $5 on the ante and $5 on the play and pray for trips!! If the Dealer does not have a Queen-high or better the Ante bet pays, but the Play bet is a push. The Pair Plus is always in play no matter the Dealer's cards. For the hand you are showing, these are the correct payoffs. Interesting. I thought the ACCEPT AT checked the value and just went back to the same line. I'll have to take a look. Thanks again for the feedback!
-
For some reason this downloads as executable "HREECARD"...but still works in Classic99
-
99ers: A few months ago I was looking for an app to play three card poker and didn't find one I liked, so I decided to write it in XB. For those unfamiliar with the game, there are a bunch of videos on youtube: Basic strategy is to play when you hold an Q-high or better and fold anything below that. Even after several hours of free cocktails, you can still maintain perfect strategy ;). This is also one of the only poker games where a straight beats a flush. The three best hands are straight, 3 of a kind and straight flush and the TI-99 will show it's appreciation when you get them. Enjoy! Req: Extended Basic, 32k Updated version: THREECARD
-
Finally finished my SAMS board (parts delay). Test Sat / no errors. Weller 1010 was an absolute pleasure to work with! No more testing the heat of my soldering iron by licking it 😉
-
It is very confusing (for me)! The manual indicated that you could use the DB25 serial connection too, but needed a interface box that Royal sold. Not sure if any of those survived.
-
The three cables from IEC all have the right connections. Now it is just a matter of testing to see if one has the right pinouts
-
Thanks, Ksarul. I ordered one of each and will report back on this thread after testing in case anybody else is interested in the Royal Alpha 2015.
-
Hello 99ers, I picked up a Royal Alpha 2015 that I’m going to try and get setup as a printer. Looking at the manual, it appears every period computer needed a specific cable (RS232 to Centronics). Does anybody know if there is anything available “off the shelf” that would have the pin outs of Royal P/N PCUA 013156. I’m assuming I’ll have to make a cable, but doesn’t hurt to check. Thanks!
-
It even has the original v1.0 dent on top! A very rare option
-
Heads up: https://www.ebay.com/itm/125474516643?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=Bbq1Ls4SSiK&sssrc=2349624&ssuid=QfU6nnIiRby&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY
-
