pancio

Why you're still mixing main topic with something else? Do you like potatoes with pitch jam? 🙂 Well, I know one more person which doing in same way: 🙂 As I said, presented by Galtron (and you) solution was based on Pasiu's idea - means shall be reviewed and equipped with required additional elements if necessary... but it's just copy without any modifications, so works as designed! I haven't MyIDE so I cannot confirm that @reifsnyderb solution working fine with it but I can confirm that it's working fine with IDE+ and SIDE2, MaxFlash8M and more. Don't be shy Piotr 🙂 It is more than personally jab, especially that you are doing the same way: offering not tested prototypes to customers on PCBWay. You're telling some long and drawn-out stories again...I don't get what you mean at all. Are you writing here about Rapidus and its PHI stabilization system or are you introducing some other fairy tales? The example you cited is well described and on YT you can find videos describing all the problems with this adapter. I personally tested it and I agree that it works very unstable with 65C02 even without AVG. I have to admit though, you are a master at creating something out of nothing and writing great sounding stories for those who don't know electronics and are unable to verify your WooDoos. I am an electronics amateur but sometimes I can't stand such hypocrisy and basing on the ignorance of others. BR, pancio

No, that's not a mistake. Galtron's version is based on Pasiu's idea and you've said it on FB several times. If it were otherwise, Galtron would have said it a long time ago. But that's not the most important thing in this thread... You write that the project is "broken" because it doesn't work with AVG - I disagree with you. The project designed by @reifsnyderb is fine, it works with all Atari components and not just the original ones because I tested it with 512KB memory according to Hias' idea and many cartridges. There were no problems. AVG also starts - it means that communication works, the computer doesn't freeze and you can even select a program and run it (you don't always see the inverted line but the selection itself works). It means that some actions in AVG settings will be necessary and that's it. If the author finds time for tests, we can expect success. It's great that you're back to telling funny stories about how and what you do. My face is smiling like in Monty Python's sketches 🙂 BR, pancio

Just for fresh your memory: I assume you're going back to the project.. or are you just posting for better stats? I saw you were promoting Galton's project (based on Pasiu's idea) on Facebook for a while.. then you started criticizing it by making your own copy of the same thing and then you backed out... weird. Did anybody some test with Galtron's module and may share results? BR,

This is very good solution especially that made by Pasiu ~twenty years ago. I made one more piece based on @reifsnyderb idea and sent it to AVG developer. If he will find a while he check what is going on. We will see. BR,

I've been a member of ABBUC for five years and I really value this membership. I've met a lot of really interesting people - legends, even, who created really cool stuff and software when I was still very young and all I could do was change the scrolls in demos 🙂 Currently, I draw on the knowledge of the community but also share my own work. For example, when two years ago I worked with Mega Speedy - all authors were involved: FloppyDoc, Guus, Mega-hz and Hiaas... I received tons of materials! What MrFish mentioned is already a thing of the past, projects are in many cases open and often created together. ABBUC members are increasingly giving away their intellectual property so that their solutions can be continued and developed by others. The exception are competitions, where the works are hidden until the results are announced... and then released as open. I am proud to be a member of ABBUC and I know that ABBUC is open to people.

I know, my copy/paste master! 🙂

"very drastic example" - nice, you try on my board. I don't know if it's an honor or an insult for me 🙂 BR, pancio

I don't understand your excitement. You only showed that you put a footprint on the PNG image.. where the innovation is? Has your great achievement made it to the official KiCAD branch? (try to answer questions, not to muddy the thread)

I need to ask... what is the connection between your notice and "SAVO, SAVO CLASSIC (rev. 2), SAVO+, SAVO MAX, HAVO, O2/Fixer and other..."? Are you official KiCAD developer?

I Agree, Had the same situation with Atari 65XE and PHI/PHI_BUF signals which were drawn with errors. I checked these with real Atari and fix it on original schematic to avoid the same issue in the future: https://systemembedded.eu/download/file.php?id=351 Regarding A400 and memory module I guess that is possible to use 4164 chips as successor which not need -5V power. Is exist originally RAM board 32KB for Atari 400? BR, pancio

Oh... ok... I didn't realize because I saw only this RAM module schematic: Thanks a lot, so I need to find one more PSu.. or AC 9V which is difficult 🙂 BR, pancio

Hi, Thank you for notice 🙂 I know this diagram... but I want to use little modern, smaller PSUs powered directly form USB-C. I followed -5V wire on all schematic but I didn't find any element which using it. I'm asking to be sure that I'm not missing any important thing. BR, pancio

Hi, Quick question... Is -5V needed by any component into Atari 400? I want to use two step-up/down PSU as power for my Atari 400 bought into USA instead original AC PSU. I thinking to move to top output for A202 (LM7805) together with R203 for 5V, L205 for 12V and connect my new PSUs directly to J201 (12V->2, 5V->7 pin) BR, pancio

Thank you for your kind words. Your projects show that electronics can be friendly to everyone. And thanks to the fact that you shared them with the community, new ideas and additions can be created. This was the case with SIO2MIDI, which inspired me to make MIDIcar 🙂 BR, pancio

The idea of FF is to latch GTIA data with doubled FPHI0 (or x4) frequency. It's not a problem use FF with Xe series - you have required frequency on Freddie. The problem is if you have XL without Freddie. So I decided to use frequency multiplier with PLL... this is only one additional main component. But as I said, your solution is so good so probably I will drop this additional fix (multiplier and latches) from final solution and will stay as you designed for UGV-II. After tests I'll share all materials. BR, pancio