Randolph Laterca

Great improvement in playability over the last demo, but the fifth level is almost Impossible.?

Congratulations! The graphics looks like an early third generation game, very impressive indeed. Waiting for a cartridge release!

Impressive!

So... can i start to dream about that 3200 clone that you promised? ?

The Angelica game never saw the light of the day and this Atari clone looks a lot like the Phoenix (the console on these pictures is not mine) which is pretty rare.

Thanks Tavi,! The modified ROM works fine, but i'd like the Harmony natively support the unmodified ROM.

Hi! Any chance to get a new firmware to play pursuit of the pink panther without a modified ROM? Thanks!

Incredible game! I didn't play the arcade, but the controls feels a bit "loose", especially on the third stage were the jumps are really hard.

My 2 cents... The problem is that most of the candidates were distribuited by AtariAge wich is huge compared to other small producers. Most of these games (or packages) had their quality well known among the collectors around the world, so whats the chance that a small company to compete in equality of conditions? Most of the people complaining about the result doesn't even known that this game or the game developer existed before the prize, so how could anyone to judge imparcially all the candidates? Since most of this games came from this forum and most of the votes too, how can we "equalize" the situation? There's people making good games and boxes with small distribution around the world, so how could we be fair with everyone? Unfortunatelly there's no easy soluction or even right or wrong answer to this question... Many members have already assumed that the game did not deserve to win, even without having had the chance to know it, regardless of the discrepancy in the votes...

Thank you! ? In fact, i agree with you Thomas, but the problem is that most of the candidates were distribuited by AtariAge wich is huge compared to other small producers. Most of these games (or packages) had their quality well known among the collectors around the world, so whats the chance that a small company to compete in equality of conditions? Most of the people complaining about the result doesn't even known that this game or the game developer existed before the prize, so how could anyone to judge imparcially all the candidates? Since most of this games came from this forum and most of the votes too, how can we "equalize" the situation? There's people making good games and boxes with small distribution around the world, so how could we be fair with everyone? Unfortunatelly there's no easy soluction or even right or wrong answer to this question...

And if this information is relevant, i didn't vote on any game this year! ? Sorry my lame english. ??

As an Atari collector, i also collect homebrew games and i can say that rally racer has one of the most creative packages on the market. Geez...even the cartridge shell is brand new, i dont see any problem to freely advertize your game since the winner is chosen by popular vote.

Me too!

Looks promising, i'll try tomorrow on my harmony!

Great game! ??