itaych Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 sending CR-NUL-LF instead of CR-LF seems totally broken to me considering that sending CR-LF is the recommendation in the RFCs On a similar note I've recently been discussing the Linux X/Y/Zmodem implementation with its author, Uwe Ohse, asking him why in a couple of places the Zmodem sender sz (which imitates Chuck Forsberg's original) does things not according to the document standard, breaking Ice-T's receiver. He had a few choice words on the subject, which I believe should be a guiding light to inspire us all in these difficult situations: "I do not think the specification is worth anything. Regards, Uwe" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.