Jump to content
IGNORED

Atari Flashback 64 Special Edition


Recommended Posts

That'd be a trick, given that apart from the first two Flashbacks, none of these has even had VCS chipsets in them. And then there's the licensing.

 

Only the second Flashback (2 and 2+) had the chip. The first Flashback was a horrible NOC. AtGames has a Genesis-on-a-chip, which is why they can do cartridge-based Genesis products, but they don't have an Atari-2600-on-a-chip. Frankly, they're not going to license or create it, either, so no, it's out. It's also highly unlikely Atari would sublicense for a similar product to anyone but AtGames, who is coming out with the next Flashback in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I understand correctly, the FB4 uses an ARM processor to run a VCS software emulator. If so, they could have put non-Atari ROMs on here, but don't have the licencing.

It's too bad. I would consider buying one of these if there were a way to load a ROM or a cart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not just spend 40 bucks on an Android stick, then? They're ARM-based too, and there are a couple different Stella ports which are probably more faithful than whatever Atgames came up with (unless they're using Stella and violating the GPL). Any of them have enough flash to put every Atari game, homebrew, demo and WIP on them, many times over, though I guess you'd need a Stelladaptor to use real controllers with them. As a bonus, you can also play almost every NES, SNES, PS1, N64, C64 and arcade game ever made too, plus the subset of Android games that have mappable controls.

 

Yes, they're HDMI and not composite, but then, a real VCS only has an antenna output (and you can get a used one cheaper than any of these licensed ones, and it has a cartridge slot and all the terrible image quality a nostalgic purist can ever crave).

 

To be honest, owning two VCSes and two Android sticks and an array of control options, the only things about the Atgames Flashback units that intrigue me are the games that are significantly different on them or don't exist outside of them -- I could easily imagine that portrait mode Space Invaders screenshot being representative of what's on the device, which would destroy the nostalgia value for those of us who grew up with the 2600 but might be an interesting variation nonetheless. But I'm not interested enough to spend 70 bucks on it, especially when I already have the FB2 for stuff like Return to Haunted House.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Good idea. What device and setup do you you use and recommend? Is there a web page that I can visit that will help me set that up?

 

You could try a Raspberry Pi with Chameleon, a Linux distro that has a bunch of emulators preconfigured. Stella runs well. The RPi has both HDMI and composite video output, so it will even work with retro TVs ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Only the second Flashback (2 and 2+) had the chip. The first Flashback was a horrible NOC. AtGames has a Genesis-on-a-chip, which is why they can do cartridge-based Genesis products, but they don't have an Atari-2600-on-a-chip. Frankly, they're not going to license or create it, either, so no, it's out. It's also highly unlikely Atari would sublicense for a similar product to anyone but AtGames, who is coming out with the next Flashback in 2014.

 

Any chance the next flashback will have SD slot? I am still disappointed Curt's Flashback portable system never got released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Any chance the next flashback will have SD slot? I am still disappointed Curt's Flashback portable system never got released.

 

I've strongly advised that it should have it, but it's not looking good right now. I suspect it's tied to licensing issues. I'm still amazed Sega has been so wonderfully liberal with that kind of thing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could try a Raspberry Pi with Chameleon, a Linux distro that has a bunch of emulators preconfigured. Stella runs well. The RPi has both HDMI and composite video output, so it will even work with retro TVs ;)

 

That would actually be a far better option than my Android sticks, even though its hardware is weaker. The Pi has a huge community around it that no Android TV device does. Also, Linux emulators generally perform better than Android ones, and there aren't many good Android front-ends. (Yes, Android uses a Linux kernel, but doesn't run Linux apps natively due to all the missing GNU stuff. On the other hand, I don't think the Pi will be playing any N64 games, but most of us here probably don't care about that.) And while Android sticks all look kind of like the old RF switch box we all know and love, with the Pi you can get cases like this:

 

http://shop.pimoroni.com/products/pibow-raspberry-pi-case

 

or more seriously, http://www.fuze.co.uk/product/the-fuze-for-raspberry-pi-everything-but-the-pi/

 

or maybe most appealing to 2600 fans, http://shop.pimoroni.com/products/pibow-timber

 

 

I got ours in a hurry when one of our laptops died suddenly and we needed a cheap, quick way to browse the web and edit documents, or I probably would have gone for the Pi myself. Wish Chameleon supported other devices -- there's an Android ROM called Chameleon, but it's unrelated, and making things like accelerated video work on cheap Chinese kit is often a lost cause.

 

If you do go the Android route, installing emulators is a little easier than it is on a desktop computer, and XBMC makes an okay "big picture" style launcher that also plays music and video. I'd also recommend getting your emulators from the F-droid app store, because everything in it is free and open source. There are a lot of opportunists on Google Play, both the kind who want your money (which is fine, I've bought 60 or 70 commercial games myself, though many are better on a tablet than a TV) and the kind who want to spy on you or worse.

 

I know, this is getting pretty tangential, but to me, unless you're getting something like the FB2, you're essentially using emulators anyway so you might as well get something that can do more. (Says the guy with a 6-foot-shelf full of plug-n-plays.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ouya's controller sucks (despite its touchpad being a nice idea) and many of the emulators available for it, unless you figure out how to sideload regular Android apps, cost money even though the straight Android versions are free. It's notoriously brickable as well, due to its lack of a proper recovery mode, making it a lousy device to hack despite its hype. I'd definitely choose either a Raspberry Pi or one of the better-supported generic Android sticks over that.

 

I still have hope for its next iteration, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This system is $30 at Wal-Mart...enough of the FB for Atari, we have like 5 now, I want to see one for 5200, 7800, XE, or something NOT Atari: Intellivsion, Colecovision, TG16...

 

You'll see another Atari 2600 Flashback (and more Sega stuff), as well as Intellivision and ColecoVision, in 2014. For the reasons mentioned elsewhere, it's extremely unlikely most other platforms will ever be targeted, at least by AtGames. There's an outside shot we may see some arcade and Commodore-themed (C-64 and Amiga) products, but I know of nothing else that's being actively considered.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have an Commodore one, it's a PNP Joystick styled system.

 

Yes, I have a few myself. I did a review back in 2004. That was a proper simulation of the hardware like the Flashback 2. We almost certainly won't be seeing that again, at least from AtGames.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...