CatPix Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 Nice to know! That make it more interesting.. I alway though it was a monochrome screen, would have made sense; this thing was targeted to professionnal, and a monochrome display is easier to read (especially given the luma+ chroma nature of the video output) and for professionnal items, was looking "more serious". Most word processing machines of the era were only monochrome machines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roland p Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 The atari version (prototype) has a monochrome monitor: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 The SX-64's screen is surprisingly usable. I used to call BBSes and a Vax/VMS machine using Novaterm in 80 column mode on it. I am not certain my eyes could easily make out the shape of three pixel-wide characters these days, but back then it was just fine for me. I am looking to find a good LCD to replace the CRT in mine. The CRT still works, but I think I can do better for weight, power, and heat. I will undoubtedly, however, run into the same problem I have with desktop LCDs: finding just the right screen so pixels are not fat and skinny all the way across, distorting the aspect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkO Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 (edited) At the time these were sold, Commodore had announced an SX-100, which was basically this machine with a monochrome monitor. They also announced a DX-64, which was supposed to have a second floppy drive where this thing's storage bay is located. Neither of those machines made it to market because the SX-64 was a commercial flop compared to the original C64 model. The SX-64 is the Only Commodore I bought.... BITD, I got it from a guy who bought it from COMB, the liquidator, because he wanted to move up to a C128, and was keeping his C64. I have got many Commodore computers and parts since then, but all were given to me.... A photo from a couple years ago: From my Tech Page. MarkO Edited October 18, 2015 by MarkO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlsson Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 Regarding flop or not, supposedly many potential business customers waited for the dual drive DX-64 to arrive, and weren't interested in the single drive SX-64 that actually came out. If Commodore had been more clear there would not be a dual drive version, perhaps more businesses would've settled for a SX-64 after all. Of course there were a lot of other competition, all those Osbornes, Kaypros and other luggables which didn't make life easier for Commodore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRTGAMER Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 Nice Find! I modded my SX64 with 8-9 floppy drive switch, computer reset button and even added Composite and Audio RCA inputs with select switches. Silly watching a DVD on a tiny screen, just wanted to see if it could be done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7800fan Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 I would love an SX64 myself. But not a stock, one with LCD, SD2IEC drive, and be able to run off batteries. (would have to fake stable 9v AC off battery somehow) The stock SX64 were quite heavy, removing the original drive and the CRT would probably go a long way to making it lighter. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockman_x_2002 Posted October 19, 2015 Author Share Posted October 19, 2015 The stock SX64 were quite heavy, removing the original drive and the CRT would probably go a long way to making it lighter. No doubt. 23 pounds, I believe. It's "portable" only in the academic sense: It's self-contained and it has a handle. Doubt you'd want to do any long-distance carrying for any length of time, though. Though that raises another point: the folks that had these and used them regularly for business and had to carry them around must've been built like a linebacker. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlsson Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 (edited) Why carry it around, when you can have it set up next to your lounge chair at the pool? I don't know about marketing in other countries, but the pictures used in the Swedish product folder display a foreman at a construction site, wearing helmet and his SX-64 in one hand. At home, he crunches numbers on the same computer before letting the kids play on it. Now I don't think foremen generally are physically strong, unless of course he used to be a construction worker who got promoted for his supervising skills. 7800fan: It sounds like you rather want a C64 laptop, of the kind some people have built in the last decade. Either running on real Commodore hardware or emulated stuff. Edited October 19, 2015 by carlsson 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roland p Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 The Mega-65 is planned as a laptop Form factor C65-like all-in-one. A laptop form is planned for a future release. Full-height 19" rack option extra. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkO Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 No doubt. 23 pounds, I believe. It's "portable" only in the academic sense: It's self-contained and it has a handle. Doubt you'd want to do any long-distance carrying for any length of time, though. Though that raises another point: the folks that had these and used them regularly for business and had to carry them around must've been built like a linebacker. I recall 29 pounds.. I guess I should weigh it, ( and convert to kilograms for those in the audience who don't think in old English measurements ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlsson Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 There seems to be small variations in measurements: Old-Computers: 36.8 x 12.7 x 36.8 cm, no weight measurement C64 Wiki: 36.8 x 12.7 x 36.8 cm, 10.5 kg = 23 lbs Commodore brochure: 37.0 x 12.5 x 40.0 cm, 12 kg (about 26.5 lbs) Computersmuseum.com: 43.0 x 13.5 x 37.0 cm, 10 kg If yours is closer to 29 lbs, perhaps you stuffed something into the storage space or the power supply was replaced by a heavy duty one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkO Posted October 21, 2015 Share Posted October 21, 2015 At the time these were sold, Commodore had announced an SX-100, which was basically this machine with a monochrome monitor. They also announced a DX-64, which was supposed to have a second floppy drive where this thing's storage bay is located. Neither of those machines made it to market because the SX-64 was a commercial flop compared to the original C64 model. BITD, I remember a picture of a DX-64 with Two Drives, but also remember that there was an Issue with the Power Supply.. Not enough Amps for The Computer, Two Drives and the Color Monitor.. With a new Low Power LCD Screen, there should be more than enough power for a Second Drive... Actually a nice Switching Power supply would be a good investment too.... MarkO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LiqMat Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 For that "just in case" moment. Bet you can't find these often. It's been there a while and I am surprised someone has not snatched this up. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Commodore-SX-64-CRT-NEW-FACTORY-SEALED-Replacement-Tube-Monitor-/221958476354 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7800fan Posted December 26, 2015 Share Posted December 26, 2015 Hmm I can't tell if it is tube only or if it comes with yoke already set and calibrated. If it is the naked tube, expect to spend an hour adjusting the yoke and convergence rings to get the best image on the screen. And that means having your hand very near the high voltage anode wire. That wire carries 14,000v according to the schematic. Hopefully it's already set and calibrated at factory, and that the yoke hadn't slipped out of alignment after more than 25 years of storage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LiqMat Posted December 26, 2015 Share Posted December 26, 2015 (edited) Hmm I can't tell if it is tube only or if it comes with yoke already set and calibrated. If it is the naked tube, expect to spend an hour adjusting the yoke and convergence rings to get the best image on the screen. And that means having your hand very near the high voltage anode wire. That wire carries 14,000v according to the schematic. Hopefully it's already set and calibrated at factory, and that the yoke hadn't slipped out of alignment after more than 25 years of storage. Yeah... I don't own a SX-64, but if I did that would not be my first choice hobby project. I would probably just find a willing TV service shop to install it. I was just surprised to see a NIB SX-64 tube available. Edited December 26, 2015 by LiqMat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Some of those measurements may include the handle when extended or folded under. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2Ni Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 I would love an SX64 myself. But not a stock, one with LCD, SD2IEC drive, and be able to run off batteries. (would have to fake stable 9v AC off battery somehow) The stock SX64 were quite heavy, removing the original drive and the CRT would probably go a long way to making it lighter. This wouldn't be a SX-64 any more ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockman_x_2002 Posted June 18, 2016 Author Share Posted June 18, 2016 This wouldn't be a SX-64 any more ! No, it wouldn't. Part of the charm of the SX-64 these days, at least for me, is how it screams "old tech" with its CRT display, 5.25" disk drive, and all the other trimmings. That said, if someone could develop a thinner, lighter version of the C64 that's a bit more portable, it would still be handier. Although I wouldn't cannibalize a perfectly good SX-64 for the job. In fact, what I would rather have is a C64 laptop, not unlike the one Ben Heck once built. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRTGAMER Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 The SX-64's screen is surprisingly usable. I used to call BBSes and a Vax/VMS machine using Novaterm in 80 column mode on it. I am not certain my eyes could easily make out the shape of three pixel-wide characters these days, but back then it was just fine for me. I am looking to find a good LCD to replace the CRT in mine. The CRT still works, but I think I can do better for weight, power, and heat. I will undoubtedly, however, run into the same problem I have with desktop LCDs: finding just the right screen so pixels are not fat and skinny all the way across, distorting the aspect. That would be a mistake, the LCD might be a worse picture for the resolution the Commodre puts out. No need to change that tiny CRT, it is very light. The heavy components are the built in power transformer and disk drive assembly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7800fan Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 Thread was a bit old. I got an SX since that post, a few months ago for cheap. It was dead, nothing from the CPU board. Disk drive worked and could be picked up when I jury-rigged a hookup from my regular C64 to the disk drive. The video was fine. Just nothing from CPU board. Nothing with test cart or with MAX games. CPU, kernel, and BASIC were checked good, no hot chips, probably a TTL chip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockman_x_2002 Posted June 18, 2016 Author Share Posted June 18, 2016 It is an older thread, but I'm actually glad it was bumped because it does give me an opportunity to give an update on this same SX-64. When I bought it one year ago, it was mostly working properly, except after I got home with it, I did discover a slight defect with the SID chip in that some sounds didn't seem to work. I swapped the SID out with the one from my working C64, and now it has fully working sound. As a side note, I put the SX-64's SID into my breadbin C64, and for whatever reason, it seems to work fine in that machine. So I've left it as such. I also managed to get a chance not to long ago to give some attention to the disk drive, since it originally couldn't read disks, and the ejection mechanism was kinda borked as well. I got it out, gave the read/write head a thorough cleaning, fixed the ejector arm, and I'm happy to report that the SX-64 is now 100% fully healthy!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 That would be a mistake, the LCD might be a worse picture for the resolution the Commodre puts out. No need to change that tiny CRT, it is very light. The heavy components are the built in power transformer and disk drive assembly. I get that, but I have lead on a particular screen which provides the perfect aspect ratio for use with the 64's output. And since I have a couple of SXes available, I can keep one stock and experiment with the other. I would like to replace the power supply with something modern, as well. I have a few thoughts in mind about the disk drives. The latest Commodore Free issue has a link to a guy who converted his SX-64 to a DX-64. I do not think I would go that route, but I have thought about a 1581 for the second drive, or maybe even my CMD hard drive with an SD2SCSI (currently a 1GB microSD,) but as mentioned before I think perhaps an SD2IEC would be a better way to go, especially after watching the X2014 C64 demo compo in which one was used for the presentations. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2Ni Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 I have an original SX-64 for the nostalgia, true retro feeling and as a collector, but for intensive retro gaming, C64 laptop should be fun. Even a little laptop with VICE should do the job (I have some Toshiba Libretto and a Pandora for that). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arnuphis Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Yes I have a working SX-64 as well. Great old machine. The prior user of mine was a serious user as it came with a bunch of accounting software and a MPS 803 printer. I am almost afraid to use it too much in case something on it dies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.