SoundGammon Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 (edited) Not sure you know this but Realsports Tennis will allow 4 players to play at the same time! Of course, only on a 4-port system. Been a while since I tried it, but I think one hits the number 4 on the keypad when setting up doubles before you start the game! Great game with 4 Trak-Balls! Now I wonder if the 8-bit version will let you play 4 players on a 400/800 system? Edited February 4, 2022 by SoundGammon spelling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzip Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 (edited) 7 hours ago, A Black Falcon said: Coleco stole home console rights for Donkey Kong and Donkey Kong Jr. away from Atari in the early '80s, but Atari did manage to get the console rights to Popeye and Mario Bros. This is nitpicky, but the rights to Popeye went to Parker Bros, not Atari. 7 hours ago, A Black Falcon said: Unfortunately for Atari, Mario Bros., while popular, was nowhere near the hit that Donkey Kong before it and Super Mario Bros. after it would be. This is a single-screen arcade game and while it is good, it has always been overshadowed by the games before and after it. This is certainly true! I'm not even sure Mario Bros was all that popular BITD. It's a game I rarely saw in the arcades and it wasn't a game I ever heard anyone talk much about. Even the lesser-known Donkey Kong 3, was more common in the arcades than Mario Bros in my experience. I think it's better known as a pivotal game that introduced Luigi and many of the concepts to be found in the SMB series. Edited February 4, 2022 by zzip 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+wongojack Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 9 hours ago, A Black Falcon said: Pitfall II: The Lost Caverns - 1 player. Developed and published by Activision in 1984. Overall, Pitfall II is a classic, but you will need a great deal of patience and memorization to get very far in this game. A lot of people love this game, and I recognize the games' ambition and innovation, but between the design, controls, and controller, a lot of the time I find this game much more frustrating than fun. This is a game of exploration and avoidance, and is both simple and yet complex as you try to find out where to jump from and where to go in order to find all of the gold. So far I have not been dedicated enough to it to finish the game, but it is certainly well worth trying. Objectively, Pitfall II probably is a very good to borderline great classic. Subjectively, it's a very frustrating game I don't know that I want to play much more of. You pretty much nailed Pitfall II 100%. Even right down to the fact that after you play it and are frustrated by it, you still want to rank it up. Ugh the 5200 controller is definitely at its worst here. I have never managed to really play the 5200 version even though I've got a controller adapter that gives me digital controls. Someday I will work up the courage to scoot under those birds for a few hours. Actually, the most fun I've ever had with Pitfall II is using an emulator with save states to limit the frustration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Black Falcon Posted February 5, 2022 Author Share Posted February 5, 2022 (edited) 12 hours ago, SoundGammon said: Not sure you know this but Realsports Tennis will allow 4 players to play at the same time! Of course, only on a 4-port system. Been a while since I tried it, but I think one hits the number 4 on the keypad when setting up doubles before you start the game! Great game with 4 Trak-Balls! Now I wonder if the 8-bit version will let you play 4 players on a 400/800 system? Really? I thought I'd always heard that Super Breakout was the only game from the original run which had 4-player support... I do see that I forgot to mention that RealSports Tennis has Trak-Ball support, though. I will edit that in on the version on my site, but there's not much I can do for this forum version, on Atariage you can't edit posts after like an hour for some odd reason. 11 hours ago, zzip said: This is nitpicky, but the rights to Popeye went to Parker Bros, not Atari. This is certainly true! I'm not even sure Mario Bros was all that popular BITD. It's a game I rarely saw in the arcades and it wasn't a game I ever heard anyone talk much about. Even the lesser-known Donkey Kong 3, was more common in the arcades than Mario Bros in my experience. I think it's better known as a pivotal game that introduced Luigi and many of the concepts to be found in the SMB series. Gah, I know Popeye is a Parker Bros game, I've even reviewed it in the original post in this thread... heh. I just forgot when writing that and didn't catch it. There's another thing I will definitely fix on my site and wish I could fix here. As for Mario Bros. though, I'm not sure how common the arcade cabinet was, but yeah it definitely didn't do anywhere near as well as either Donkey Kong game or Super Mario Bros, to say the last. However, it was at least a very common game in other games. It's been a bonus mode in a bunch of other Mario games, after all, starting with Mario 3 for the NES. That's mostly where I remember it from to be honest. As for Donkey Kong 3, I honestly don't think I've ever played it... I know what it is, that vertical shooter of sorts, but haven't played it as far as I can remember. 9 hours ago, wongojack said: You pretty much nailed Pitfall II 100%. Even right down to the fact that after you play it and are frustrated by it, you still want to rank it up. Ugh the 5200 controller is definitely at its worst here. I have never managed to really play the 5200 version even though I've got a controller adapter that gives me digital controls. Someday I will work up the courage to scoot under those birds for a few hours. Actually, the most fun I've ever had with Pitfall II is using an emulator with save states to limit the frustration. I like the 5200 controller quite a bit, it's a comfortable and decently designed controller. I'll defend it most of the time, but it definitely shows its weaknesses in games like this one. Getting onto and off of ladders is really frustrating with the 5200 controller. As I said in one of the articles, these issues are why modern controllers have both a d-pad AND an analog stick, and not one or the other. Other than that though, yeah, I agree entirely with what you say... there is a very interesting and important game there but it's also incredibly frustrating due to its design and limited controls. (If only you could duck under the flying enemies...) Edited February 5, 2022 by A Black Falcon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Mitch Posted February 5, 2022 Share Posted February 5, 2022 2 hours ago, A Black Falcon said: I do see that I forgot to mention that RealSports Tennis has Trak-Ball support, though. I will edit that in on the version on my site, but there's not much I can do for this forum version, on Atariage you can't edit posts after like an hour for some odd reason. Gah, I know Popeye is a Parker Bros game, I've even reviewed it in the original post in this thread... heh. I just forgot when writing that and didn't catch it. There's another thing I will definitely fix on my site and wish I could fix here. You should be able to edit your first post now. Mitch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzip Posted February 5, 2022 Share Posted February 5, 2022 13 hours ago, A Black Falcon said: As for Mario Bros. though, I'm not sure how common the arcade cabinet was, but yeah it definitely didn't do anywhere near as well as either Donkey Kong game or Super Mario Bros, to say the last. However, it was at least a very common game in other games. It's been a bonus mode in a bunch of other Mario games, after all, starting with Mario 3 for the NES. That's mostly where I remember it from to be honest. As for Donkey Kong 3, I honestly don't think I've ever played it... I know what it is, that vertical shooter of sorts, but haven't played it as far as I can remember. Yeah I don't know anyone who played Donkey Kong 3 other than myself. I liked it better than DKjr, and the first screen was pretty easy to clear if you did it quickly. It didn't get as widely ported to home systems as DK/DKjr did so I don't think it was very popular. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGHMW Posted February 6, 2022 Share Posted February 6, 2022 (edited) 12 hours ago, zzip said: Yeah I don't know anyone who played Donkey Kong 3 other than myself. I liked it better than DKjr, and the first screen was pretty easy to clear if you did it quickly. It didn't get as widely ported to home systems as DK/DKjr did so I don't think it was very popular. Up until a few weeks ago, I never heard of Donkey Kong 3 until I saw a clip of it in action on YouTube, it looked different and I'm surprised that neither it nor the arcade version of Tron were ever ported to any system, you would think that since Coleco owned the home console rights and Atari owned the computer rights to both DK and DK Jr. why they never got into a bidding war for its rights. Sometimes just because it wasn't a hit in the arcade doesn't translate it to being a flop for the home gaming market. Look at what Coleco did with all of those Universal (Ladybug, Mr. Do!, and Cosmic Avenger for instance), Sega (Space Fury, Omega Race and Zaxxon), and Exidy (Mouse Trap, Pepper II, and Venture) ports they did that turned out to be hits on ColecoVision despite them being flops in the arcade. Now Donkey Kong 3 and Tron (the arcade game) would be very interesting to see on an 8-bit system. Also when is someone gonna port the STERN version of Journey (not the Midway version based on the band) that never got released that I saw on TV on Starcade decades ago (in one episode it was the grand prize [in Episode 047] and also was featured in action in the bonus round [in Episode 034] when someone won the arcade game Munch Mobile). I just love shoot-em-ups like it and Zone Ranger and Sinistar and would love to see this unearthed from that dead world of "vaporware", it's GOTTA be out there, even if it's under a different name. Edited February 6, 2022 by BIGHMW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGHMW Posted February 6, 2022 Share Posted February 6, 2022 EDIT: It was originally an unreleased 1982 VidKidz game that Stern picked up the rights to and then because of conflict with the Midway arcade game named after that now-world-famous supergroup, the name was changed to Conquest and was sold to and distributed by Tago Electronics under that name as a conversion kit that used existing cabinets from failed games in stores and what not rather than being sold within one of its own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Black Falcon Posted February 6, 2022 Author Share Posted February 6, 2022 (edited) On 2/4/2022 at 11:32 PM, Mitch said: You should be able to edit your first post now. Mitch Thanks, I may want to edit some things into the first post, but both of those edits need to go into post 25, the last post on page one, not the first post. 2 hours ago, BIGHMW said: Up until a few weeks ago, I never heard of Donkey Kong 3 until I saw a clip of it in action on YouTube, it looked different and I'm surprised that neither it nor the arcade version of Tron were ever ported to any system, you would think that since Coleco owned the home console rights and Atari owned the computer rights to both DK and DK Jr. why they never got into a bidding war for its rights. Sometimes just because it wasn't a hit in the arcade doesn't translate it to being a flop for the home gaming market. Look at what Coleco did with all of those Universal (Ladybug, Mr. Do!, and Cosmic Avenger for instance), Sega (Space Fury, Omega Race and Zaxxon), and Exidy (Mouse Trap, Pepper II, and Venture) ports they did that turned out to be hits on ColecoVision despite them being flops in the arcade. Now Donkey Kong 3 and Tron (the arcade game) would be very interesting to see on an 8-bit system. You rarely see it, but there is a NES version of Donkey Kong 3. It's out there and isn't all THAT expensive, demand is low. Also, you're right that different games can be successful at home than were popular in arcades, but I don't think Mario Bros. was a big hit in either place. Sure, people liked it, particularly in multiplayer, but it wasn't a phenomenon like DK or SMB. As for Coleco, they had to work with what they could get. Atari had the licenses for a lot of the top arcade games, so Coleco had to push second-tier games. They did a pretty good job of it, mostly. Edited February 6, 2022 by A Black Falcon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Mitch Posted February 6, 2022 Share Posted February 6, 2022 13 hours ago, A Black Falcon said: Thanks, I may want to edit some things into the first post, but both of those edits need to go into post 25, the last post on page one, not the first post. Try now. Mitch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGHMW Posted February 6, 2022 Share Posted February 6, 2022 15 hours ago, A Black Falcon said: Also, you're right that different games can be successful at home than were popular in arcades, but I don't think Mario Bros. was a big hit in either place. Sure, people liked it, particularly in multiplayer, but it wasn't a phenomenon like DK or SMB. As for Coleco, they had to work with what they could get. Atari had the licenses for a lot of the top arcade games, so Coleco had to push second-tier games. They did a pretty good job of it, mostly. THAT'S why it doesn't hurt to have both, after all, we're no longer in the era of the "third-wave wars" where you could only have one or the other, just like (in my old stomping grounds of L.A., native Californian speaking born in 1966) we also no longer have the infamous "L.A. Radio Wars" from 1982-86 in which 102.7 KIIS-FM was mopping up the competition (and still does to this very day) with their CHR/Top-40 format for FM radio, in was spiking up in popularity to the point where AM radio stations were soon relegated to either the bullshit "Music Of Your Life", all-talkradio, all-newsradio, or all-sportsradio formats like most of them are now. As for Coleco vs. Atari, YES I WAS originally an Atari-only, 5200-only kinda guy, I even didn't think very highly of the 2600 at that time (oh how times change!!!) until I went to my old classmate Lisa Rivers' (now Lisa Rivers-Halfon) parents' house in '83 where her younger brother Natan had both a 2600 and a ColecoVision. I can't tell you how many times I whooped his behind on some of his own games, especially Pepper II, in which is a C-V staple (and on my C-V Atarimax) along with Space Fury. And I even returned the favor and showed him how to play most of my 5200 carts as well whenever he came over to my folks' house. So yes, that's why if it came down to having only two gaming systems it would be both of the third-wave systems, and just think, we used to fight over which console was the best, now 40 years later we just enjoy both for what they were, and they were both great, in their own unique way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzip Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 On 2/5/2022 at 11:44 PM, BIGHMW said: Up until a few weeks ago, I never heard of Donkey Kong 3 until I saw a clip of it in action on YouTube, it looked different and I'm surprised that neither it nor the arcade version of Tron were ever ported to any system, you would think that since Coleco owned the home console rights and Atari owned the computer rights to both DK and DK Jr. why they never got into a bidding war for its rights. DK3 got ported to the NES and showed up on later Nintendo systems If I were to guess what happened- Mario Bros arcade came out in April of 1983 and DK3 came out in Sep of 1983. Previously, Atari had the rights to computer versions of Donkey Kong games, and Coleco had the rights to console version. Atari was negotiating with Nintendo to sell NES in North America. But at the Summer CES that year, Atari execs saw Coleco running Donkey Kong on the Adam Computer, they went and ripped into the Nintendo execs accusing them of violating the license agreement. Nintendo in turn screamed at the Coleco execs. I'm sure this soured those relationships and nobody was in a rush to license DK3 especially since it wasn't a hit in the arcades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Black Falcon Posted February 10, 2022 Author Share Posted February 10, 2022 And here is the third and so far final part. I didn't want to wait any longer before posting this one! There are only six games covered this time, but what this update may lack in quantity of games it makes up for with quality: several of these are among the very best games I have played on the 5200, and indeed perhaps of the 1980s as a whole. Table of Contents Space Dungeon Star Wars: The Arcade Game Tempest [Cancelled Game Homebrew Release] Wizard of Wor Vanguard Xari Arena [Cancelled Game Homebrew Release] Rankings The Summaries Space Dungeon - 1 or 2 player alternating. Two controllers required. Supports the Atari 5200 Controller Holder. Developed by Taito America Corporation and published by Atari in 1983. Space Dungeon is an innovative and brilliant game that I had not heard of before the '00s, as with most games on this console, but everyone really SHOULD know. Space Dungeon is one of the first twinstick shooters. Indeed, this might be the very first game which uses the classic twin-stick control scheme, with one stick for aiming and one stick for moving. This game, one of few games developed by Taito's American branch which would mostly just be a publishing arm, released in arcades in 1981. As a result, it pre-dates Williams' much more famous Robotron 2084, the so-called (but not actual) "first twin-stick shooter". That game became a massive arcade sensation which made twin-stick games popular, and proved to be a second major success for creator Eugene Jarvis, following Defender. It deserved the success, Robotron is an amazing game which does just about everything right. However, that this predecessor in its genre, Space Dungeon, was forgotten and has remained a very obscure title only released in arcades, the Atari 5200, and a half-baked PSP collection port is a tragedy! Because this game is AMAZING. The original arcade game gets most of the credit of course, but this Atari 5200 port is fantastic, playing just like the arcade game except for a lower screen resolution and some slowdown. I said in my first Atari 5200 Game Opinion Summaries list that Defender was my favorite 5200 game, and it still may be because that is an exceptional port of one of the very best pre-crash games, but this game gives it a serious run for its money; honestly, it's probably a tie between these two games. They are both A+ graded classics, hands-down. The game lacks variety once you get used to it, but other than that is one of the absolute best games of its era. And again, it is quite innovative too. What makes this game so good, and so original? First, the controls. I am not sure what the first arcade game with twin-stick shooting was, it seems to be unclear whether it was this game or another game released in 1981, Mars from Artic Electronics, but either way, at the time this control scheme was very new and the game implements it extremely well. You move with one stick, and fire with the other. It must be said though, both movement and shooting are eight-way only, and are digital-only. So, this game does not make use of the 5200's controller. Fortunately, the game works well on this stick and playing this game on 5200 controllers feels great; of the digital-only-control 5200 games this has some of the best controls. It probably helps that you won't be using those mushy buttons but instead just two sticks. Before I continue, I do need to mention that when buying this game do make sure to get the Atari 5200 Controller Holder. It is a plastic piece which you can lock two 5200 controllers into, effectively giving you one stable twin-stick joystick. If you don't have one the game is playable, but MUCH less comfortable to play unless you make your own controller holder somehow. Getting a loose cart copy of this game is relatively cheap, but the Controller Holder costs more. It is only used by this game and Robotron, but is well worth it regardless. Comparing this game with the Controller Holder to Atari 7800 Robotron, which doesn't have one, is a night and day difference! Space Dungeon is, as with most games of the era, and endless score-attack game which goes until you die. Along the way you will challenge an infinite number of randomly generated mazes. Before each of the first ten levels, custom text boxes introduce the stage, and new game elements are introduced in each of the first few levels. If you get good enough to get past level ten, though, the game continues on pretty much the same from then on. Getting that far will be a significant challenge however, because this game is satisfyingly hard! Space Dungeon has a good difficulty curve, starting easy and steadily introducing new elements through those first few levels until you're fully used to the game, at which point the real challenge begins. In each level of Space Dungeon, your ship explores a six by six screen maze. That's 36 screens per level. The game has a fantastic on-screen map showing both where you have explored and a lot of useful information; more on that later. The open space within each screen is always empty, but randomly placed walls and openings along the sides of each screen add some variety; no two levels will be exactly the same. In each maze, your goal is to find your way to the exit which warps you to the next stage, while getting as many points as you can along the way. There are 14 treasures scattered around each level of the dungeon, and when you touch the warp to the next stage you get bonus points for each treasure you are carrying. Random selections of enemies will try to stop you. There are eight types of enemies in the game, with several types being added in levels two and three to the base set. The enemy types have a nice variety of types, including wall lasers, a slow but hard to kill enemy that won't be much of a threat, fast-spawning foes, and more. Some rooms have few enemies, while other rooms have many. The most enemy-heavy rooms are colored in as red on the map. If you kill enough enemies in them the levels will be cleared and go to a normal black square on the map, making them easier the next time you enter them as you explore around. It's a mix, and due to the random generation you never know what you are going to get when you enter a room. So, the core gameplay loop is to fly around, explore the map, get treasures if you want, and then go to the exit, while killing as enemies along the way. You never HAVE to get treasures, it is optional. I usually try to get them, though. It's a great design with great controls and enemies that are a very well thought through balance of challenge and fun. Enemies explode in pretty cool ways too, scattering bits of themselves all over the screen every time they blow up. This really shows off the 5200's graphical capabilities, a purely sprite-based console like the NES would have a very hard time with this most likely! It can sometimes feel unfair that the enemies can attack you from any direction while you can only fire in the eight cardinal directions, but you get used to it. Every situation is survivable with the right actions. When you lose a life, highly interesting game mechanics come into play, reminiscent of a both a Souls-like game and a Rogue-like. You see, you don't just respawn. Instead, you start back from the level's starting screen. Your map exploration data for the level is carried over, including which rooms are red enemy-heavy ones and such. Unfortunately, the actual contents of rooms is not carried over, so if you die in a room with some interesting setup of enemies when you get back to that room those foes will not be there. This is one of the only flaws in this game, really, but I'm sure keeping 36 screens of stuff in memory was way too much. But anyway, when you die, you drop all treasures you were carrying. All of them are left on the screen you died on, and a map marker shows which screen you died on. So yeah, this game has corpse runs! The idea may have been seen in some game before this one, but it's very interesting to see it here in this twinstick shooter. There is an additional wrinkle, too: one enemy type, the Thief, also collects the treasures as it goes around. The Thief's location is marked on the map at all times. If you shoot the Thief it drops all treasures it is carrying, but a few enemies appear as well. You cannot kill the Thief for good, it'll fly off after being shot. So, wait too long and the Thief will get your treasures and you will need to hunt down the Thief instead of your corpse marker. Helpfully, the map always tells you where the Thief is. This whole system is a really interesting mechanic which adds a lot of depth to the game. And that is Space Dungeon. While like all classic games the simple design could get repetitive, this game mixes that repetition up with its always-changing levels and room layouts add variety. With simple but very responsive controls, good graphics with lots of stuff going on on screen as the enemies blast apart, and gameplay that is a hybrid of an arcade twin-stick shooter with some elements of a roguelike adventure game mixed in, once I bought the game in early 2021 Space Dungeon almost immediately became one of my favorites. The game is repetitive, sure, but it is incredibly engaging and fun as you explore the maps, look for treasures, fill out the maps, blow apart enemies, and then do it all again on the next stage. The difficulty is incredibly well balanced, providing a good but approachable challenge. This is my favorite game that I bought in 2021. Space Dungeon has only ever been released in arcades, the Atari 5200, and on the PSP in the Taito Legends Power-Up collection. Sadly there has never been a release on a modern console with two sticks. There should be. Star Wars: The Arcade Game - 1 player. Has analog controls. Developed and published by Parker Bros. based on the Atari arcade game, in 1983. Yes, this is an official port of an Atari game that was not not made by Atari. Licensing... Atari's first Star Wars arcade game is a vector graphics game. This game is a target-shooting game which borders on rail shooter. Think of as being basically like a light gun game with a joystick, except if you move to the edges of the screen you can move around a little to change direction or avoid obstacles, depending on the stage. The game has three different sections: a space battle against oncoming TIE Fighters, a flight over the surface of the Death Star shooting at towers trying to take you down, and finally you re-enact the famous Death Star trench run scene, albeit sometimes with obstacles added in the trench, as the game gets harder, in order to up the challenge. I don't know if I've ever played the game in an arcade, but I have played home versions of it, such as this or the very good port included in Rogue Squadron 3 for the Gamecube. It's a good, classic arcade game. This home console version is as straight a port of the arcade game as the Atari 5200 can muster. Obviously the graphics here are sprite-based and are no match for the perfect lines of the vector arcade game, but even so this is a pretty nice looking game. Each of the three stage types are here, and they all play just like they should. The controls are very good, and are fully analog like you would hope for. Your cursor moves responsively and while it takes some practice to reliably hit targets, once you get used to it the game can be quite fun. It is repetitive, as you'll just do those three stage types on repeat as you destroy one Death Star after another, but they do add more enemies and obstacles in the stages as you progress, so the game does change as you get farther into it. This is a simple game. In the first stage, the TIE fighter attack, you just need to survive. Shoot the shots heading towards you and shoot down what TIEs you can. That may sound easy, but the TIEs are fast and can be hard to hit, it's tricky. In the second, which first appears in the second loop, you fly over the Death Star's surface, shooting the tops of towers. If you get all of them you get a points bonus. They are shooting back though, this is no bonus stage. And last, you go down that trench, avoiding walls and such that may appear in later loops, before the exhaust port appears. Shoot into it to destroy the Death Star. Otherwise, you'll repeat the trench run until you run out of lives or destroy it, after which it's on to the next level to do the same thing again but slightly harder. You start with nine hits before you get Game Over. It's a generous enough amount that beating the first loop will be simple, but make no mistake, getting a high score will be plenty challenging. That's pretty much the game, though. It just has the one mode. It's a pretty good game with good graphics and decent audio, and is and a solid port of an arcade classic. However, this game is simple to a fault. There's little depth here, just memorization and twitch reaction. I like games with a bit more strategy than you find here, which is probably why I prefer games like 5200 Space Invaders or Galaxians over this or Blaster. Oh, while Blaster is better than this game, both games are good. Also, Star Wars: The Arcade Game can be frustrating at times as I try to stay alive while TIEs zip by too fast to hit as I pile up damage. Also, the very limited amount of movement you can make can be an issue as well, you are mostly railed onto your path and while you can avoid some obstacles and shots by moving the cursor to the correct edge of the screen to turn slightly away from it, dodging isn't easy. Sega's Star Wars arcade game from a good ten years after this one also has limited movement, but you can move around a bit more in that game than you can here. It works as it is, but is occasionally annoying. And of course there is no way to reproduce that vector look on an '80s TV. Overall, I think Star Wars: The Arcade game is good, but not great. It's fun, but doesn't have the variety or depth to keep me coming back long term. Still, this game can be had for a reasonable price and certainly is worth owning. Arcade port. This version was also released on the Atari 8-bit computer, there without the analog controls of course. Other ports were released on many other platforms: Atari 2600, Apple II, BBC Micro, Commodore 64, Colecovision, Atari ST, PC, Sinclair ZX Spectrum, Amiga, Amstrad CPC, and Commodore 64. The arcade version is also included in Rogue Squadron 3 for the Gamecube. Tempest [Cancelled Game Homebrew Release] - 1 player. Has analog controls. Supports the Atari 5200 Trak-Ball controller. Developed and almost finished by Atari in 1984, but cancelled and not released. An unfinished prototype rom leaked later on. Almost 30 years later the original programmer went back and finished the game in 2012, and AtariAge published it in 2013. Tempest is one of Atari's more popular classic arcade games. It was another vector monitor game, a tube shooter where you spin around the outside top of a tube shooting enemies coming up towards you from the bottom. As with a lot of games though, the 5200 version was never released, it was cancelled along with most 5200 projects in the works in 1984. Fortunately, this one had gotten far enough into development for it to be salvageable into a completed game, as I described above. The result is a pretty fantastic conversion of Tempest to the 5200. This is a great game and a standout for the 5200. However, it is impossible for me to look at this game without thinking of Tempest 2000 and its sequels. I know it is deeply unfair to this game to compare it to a game ten years newer and that was made for much more powerful hardware, but I have a lot more experience with Tempest 2000 than I do the original game, honestly, so I can't help it. Tempest 2000 is a trancendent masterpiece and one of my favorite games ever. This game? It's quite good, but isn't on that level. But for the hardware this does about as much as you can. It is a clear downgrade from the arcade version of the original Tempest as well, but not much could be done about that. As in the arcade game, in Tempest for the 5200 you control a ship which moves around the upper edge of a polygonal shape, either a wall or circle of some kind, which extends into the distance below. From the bottom of the shape, enemies emerge, moving upwards towards you. If they touch you, you die. They also will shoot at you, though your shots cancel theirs. You can't shoot all the time though, you have a shot limit. So, you need to shoot them first, but also shoot carefully, in a fast-paced and hectic game with stuff happening all over. It's a lot to take in, but it's also what makes Tempest so much fun. This is a simple but very well made game with brilliant design and very strong "just one more game" qualities. All of the enemies from the arcade game are here, as are the level maps. There are quite a few unique stage layouts, and though of course the game loops endlessly once you've seen them all it steadily gets harder as it does so. You probably won't see most of them without a lot of practice, though, because Tempest is tough. The gameplay and controls here are very good. You move left and right with the stick. One button fires, and the other one uses your screen-clearing bomb. You get one bomb per level. This game has full analog movement. The controls are even better with the Trak-Ball controller, too. Tempest was designed for a spinner, and the 5200 does not have one of those, though homebrew ones do exist. The Trak-Ball is the next best thing for most of us, though, and fits the game very well. Once you get used to it, moving around by spinning that ball is a whole lot of fun. You have slower and more precise control with the trackball than the joystick. For features, there are three difficulty levels, Beginner, Normal, or Expert. In Beginner or Normal modes you can start from any odd-numbered level from 1 to 9, but in Expert you can start from levels all the way up to level 81. There are only a dozen or so different level maps, but each time they loop the background color changes, which is a nice touch. There are apparently 96 individual levels, just like the arcade game, but given the utterly insane speeds of the higher stages I've never gotten even close to seeing them. I mostly play this game on Normal. I presume it loops after level 96? I should mention the major downside of 5200 Tempest, though: the graphics. While great for the 5200, these low resolution, very pixelated graphics can be a bit hard to make out sometimes. Where, exactly is that enemy in that pixelated blob? Are they on this block of the stage or the next one? And are they on top, or not? It can be quite hard to tell when you will touch an enemy and die, and when you still have room to shoot them and they are actually aren't quite on the top. The lines of the well are a different color from the enemies, their shots are a slightly different color, you are a third color, and the game highlights which space you are on top of, but even so the graphics are low resolution and extremely pixelated, to making out details is tough. This is probably the games' biggest drawback. Well, also I wish it had background music, but the arcade game didn't have it either. Impressively, considering the games' 3-d nature, Tempest runs very well, with no slowdown and minimal flicker. This is a crazy-fast game that runs pretty smoothly. Once the screen really fills up with enemies some may seem to blink a little as they move from path to path, but it's minor. It runs amazingly well. Staying alive will be the challenge. Even in this very low-rez form, Tempest is an impressive and somewhat creepy game; the tension as you shoot down that well at the creatures crawling up at you can get to you. This is particularly true once some reach the top and start moving around the top lip towards you. You'd better hope you have some luck or a bomb! Tempest is kind of a horror game in a way, and this is even more true in Tempest 2000. This is a tense, challenging shooter where focus is key. The game is on the line between chaotic randomness and strategic shooting; you can do okay at Tempest, and have fun, while just spinning left and right and shooting down randomly, but if you want to do well at the game thought is required. I like a game to require strategy, and this game does if you want to do well, but just randomly zooming around and shooting can also be fun, in the earlier levels at least. The game eventually gets insanely difficult, particularly if you tackle the higher levels in Expert mode. Tempest 2000 is an easier game to play long sessions of, this game is more punishing. Even so, Tempest is a fantastic classic game and this is a great port of it. Sure, the pixelated graphics take some getting used to, but you'll get it. If you like Jeff Minter's shooters or have a 5200 Trak-Ball controller this game is definitely a must own. Tempest for the 5200 is not my favorite Tempest game, but given how exceptional Tempest 2000 is, that isn't much of a criticism. The game is still fantastic and holds up well today. This is a fun and addictive classic which shows what this hardware can do. This is yet another game that Atari absolutely should have released back in 1984, this is the kind of game which convinces people to buy your system! Arcade port. This version is 5200 exclusive, but the arcade version is available in many classic compilations for modern platforms. There is also an unreleased Atari 2600 version, which is much worse, and much less finished, than this one. Atari ST, Amstrad CPC, and BBC Micro versions did release in Europe, but at the time that's it. The arcade version is available for many modern platforms in various collections: The PS2, Dreamcast, PC/Mac (several different times each), Linux, SNES, PS1, Saturn, GBA, PSP, DS (two times), Xbox, iOS/Android, and N-Gage all saw Tempest release in collections. There is also a standalone digital Xbox 360 release. Wizard of Wor - 1 or 2 player simultaneous. Developed and published by CBS Electronics under license from Midway Games in 1983. Wizard of Wor is one of the best pre-crash arcade games developed internally at Midway. Midway's most successful games of the era, such as Pac-Man and Ms. Pac-Man, weren't developed by Midway itself, but Wizard of Wor was. Apart from a very short-lived attempt at making their own console, however, Midway would not start making home console versions of its game until the mid 1990s, however, so the game was licensed out for home systems. CBS Electronics made this port, from the time CBS had a short-lived videogame development division before the crash. Unfortunately the speech samples from the arcade game don't make it to this version, but otherwise this is a very faithful conversion of a good game. The graphics are not the best that the 5200 can do, but it looks nice enough and represents the game well. Unlike the Atari 2600 version there is zero flicker in this version, which is great. The arcade version of the game is a single-screen action/maze game where you need to kill all the enemies in each stage to move on to the next one. It's a bit like Night Stalker on Intellivision or Berzerk, except I'd say it's better than either of those. The games' pacing is a good balance of fast action and strategic thinking. The play area is wider than it is high, six tiles high by eleven tiles long, and there are many walls breaking up the space. There are various maze layouts, with harder ones as you progress. The current level number and both players' scores are always on screen, along with a little map showing where both players and all enemies are. The level name is regularly shown as well. This map is necessary despite the single screen nature of the game because some enemies can only be seen on the map. Oddly, Wizard of Wor on 5200, as with most all versions of the game, flips the players -- the first player starts on the right and uses controller two. Strange. And you can't just play as player two, the two player game is simultaneous co-op. In the game, the two players start in the two lower corners of the maze. You start as a Worior, trying to kill the evil Wizard of Wor and his many minions. This is a pre-crash arcade game, though, so it is endless; if you are so good as to complete all the mazes, it just loops back around. In each level, from your start point you move around the maze, aiming to shoot the enemies as they appear before they can kill you. Walls stop movement and shots, of course, but there are also open areas. There also are portals on each side of the screen to move to the other side, though unlike in Pac-Man you cannot use these all of the time, sometimes they are closed. You attack with shots, and can only shoot one shot at a time. You will need good strategy as well as quick reflexes to succeed here. Enemies kill you with a touch or a shot. Your shots can stop their shots if you shoot at the right time, but dying is easy and lives scarce, you only get three to start. It's a hard but extremely well-designed and addictive game. There are five enemy types in total, each with quite different abilities. As an aside, if you look them up, you'll see that the enemies all have amusing names -- Warluck, Burwor, and more. Some can turn invisible, watch out for those. When the Wizard himself appears, do your best to shoot him down before he flees. The controls are simple, you move with the stick and fire with a button. This game has digital controls, so it is not ideal for this controller, but it works well enough for this initially slow-paced game. Once you get farther in, though, you'll probably want a digital controller to do your best at this game. It's entirely playable on the regular controller, which is, again, all I've got other than the Trak-Ball that is not for games like this, but it will make reaction times slower. The game starts out quite manageably, as the enemies move around slowly enough for you to easily kill them. But once you face the enemies that can turn invisible some of the time, and worst of all the Wizard of Wor himself, staying alive will be a plenty challenging task. The invisible enemies are on the map, but good luck following that map and the main game screen at the same time without dying! It can be frustrating when you try to shoot an enemy's shot but instead you die while also killing the enemy and lose one of your very limited lives, but it's all fair. If you shoot too late, you're getting hit. The game ups the tempo as you go not only with harder enemies, but also with the audio -- there is music of sorts in this game, a background tone which increases in tempo as you kill more enemies and get closer to clearing the level. It really adds to the experience, and the tension. More games from this era should have music. The sound effects are all very close to the arcade as well and sound great. This game makes a lot of sounds, it adds to the fun. It is disappointing that the speech samples from the arcade game are absent here, several 5200 games do have speech, but that is one of the few issues with this otherwise great version of the game. Additionally, as for that two player co-op mode, it's pretty interesting. On the one hand, the game is cooperative, as your goal is to kill the same enemies in order to proceed. Of course you compete for score, but you also will kill the other player if you shoot them. And that's not all, you get bonus points for killing the other player, and they do lose a life. So yeah, whether this is cooperative or competitive entirely depends on who is playing... heh. Wizard of Wor is a very well designed game with good pacing, a good, simple concept, and great execution. The colors, dungeon names, Double Score Dungeons which boost your points, the tension of trying to get the Wizard before he gets away, this is a great game! Really, the games' only issues are that the simple concept may get repetitive after a while and that the controls are digital and not analog. The slower reaction time of digital controls on an analog stick will make it harder to stay alive as the game gets harder, unless you have a digital stick for your 5200. After dying a couple of levels in over and over, rarely getting farther, this game can start to feel old, even with how good it is. After a while you may want to play something else, but you'll be back. Regardless of that, Wizard of Wor is good to great. This game makes a fantastic first impression, and while dying again and again early on can be frustrating, the game is more than good enough to be worth going back to and improving at, trying to beat your best score each time. This is a great version of an under-appreciated arcade classic and I absolutely recommend it, Wizard of Wor is great! Arcade port. This version is also on the Atari 8-bit computers. Other ports were released on the Atari 2600, Commodore 64, and, under the name The Incredible Wizard, on Midway's own short-lived console, the Bally Astrocade, though Midway didn't make the port themself, they abandoned the system after just a few years. The 2600 version has very bad flicker, making it much harder to play than the other versions. Emulated releases of the arcade game are also in several modern collections, including the Midway Arcade Treasures 2 collection for PS2, Xbox, and Gamecube, the Midway Extended Play collection for PSP, and the Midway Arcade Origins collection for Xbox 360 and PS3. The 360 version is Xbox One/Series backwards compatible. Vanguard - 1 or 2 player alternating. Developed by Atari under license from SNK, in 1982. Vanguard is a port of the SNK arcade game of the same name. Atari bought the rights to this somewhat successful game, and ported it to their systems of the time. This 5200 version is very similar to the Atari 2600 version, just with better graphics and more content, as you would expect. Vanguard is a very early shmup, and is one of the first scrolling shooters of note. It's a decently good game with simple gameplay and some oddities. Yes, in some ways this games' early release date shows. Each level in Vanguard is made up of sections, each a short stage of their own. There are six different types of sections you will see, some which scroll left to right, one diagonally, and some vertically. Different levels will arrange the sections in different ways, so the game isn't the same every time. The game only has one kind of powerup, and it makes you invincible. In some stages these powerups show up regularly, and are one of the games' defining features. While invulnerable the music changes, which is neat. You can't shoot while invincible, either. You can fly right through the walls and stuff though, which is fun. The graphics are somewhat simple but are good enough, and it's nice that the game has at least some music, too many games on this system don't have any even though the hardware is perfectly capable of it. On the note of shooting, when you can shoot, you shoot in all four directions at the same time in this game. And you'll need it, with how enemies come at you from all sides as you tackle the different stage types the game throws at you. The game lacks depth; this is a very simple game, you just fly and shoot or, while invincible, just fly. You'll die often but there isn't much to the game. This game, unfortunately, isn't so much about memorizing interesting enemy patterns as it is reacting to what the game throws at you and trying to not die. The variety of stage types is nice, but there are only a few enemy types in each stage. Also, the controls have not been at all adjusted for the 5200's analog controller, so control is entirely digital and you have just the one fire button. The game is slow-paced and does not run fast, either. This game gets old quickly as you wait around for things to happen. For instance, the invincibility powerup is cool the first time you grab one and at times can save you, but given how totally invulnerable you are, getting one is basically 'you don't need to play for the next while' material, which is not great. And on top of that, the analog stick delays your inputs somewhat in a way they could have adjusted for, but didn't. River Raid for example did adjust the controls to make them analog, and as a result that game feels a lot better to play on the 5200 than Vanguard does. River Raid is honestly more fun than Vanguard, too. Overall, Vanguard is okay to good. The game is above average, but barely. It may be worth trying considering its importance and low price, though. Still, with slow and flawed gameplay with little enemy variety, Vanguard hasn't aged as well as the best of the static-screen shooters of its era. I do find this game somewhat fun, but once you're used to the various stage types Vanguard gets old fast and it doesn't really keep me coming back. The game is a decent challenge, looks okay, and I like the variety of stage types, but with very slow and simple gameplay and sometimes frustrating controls, it is around average overall. Arcade port. This version was also released on Atari 8-bit computers. A similar but downgraded version is on the Atari 2600. The arcade version has modern platform digital re-releases, including a standalone release on PSP in the PS Minis line and in the SNK 40th Anniversary Collection for PS4, Switch, and Xbox One. Xari Arena [Cancelled Game Homebrew Release] - 1 or 2 player simultaneous. Has analog controls. Supports the Atari 5200 Trak-Ball controller. Developed by Atari in 1983-1984, but not released until AtariAge published it in recent years. Xari Arena is a cancelled game that was in development in 1984 when Atari pulled the plug on the console far before its time. It's sort of two player cooperative, and kind of competitive, Breakout, but with some weird, unique twists. It's got fantastic graphics and audio, too. Unfortunately, while the game was complete, Warner Bros., Atari's owners at the time, chose to never release it... not until fans got ahold of it much later and released it themselves, that is. The game seems to get a mixed reception among the fans who have played it, either in emulation, on a flashcart, or as I have it in AtariAge's semi-official boxed release. Some people love this game, while others find it not very good at all. Once I explain how it plays, I think it makes sense why it's divisive. But what do I think? I absolutely love this game! With some of the best graphics, audio, and controls on the system and outstanding gameplay, Xari Arena is an all-time classic. While not quite as amazing as Defender or Space Dungeon are on the 5200, this is still an A-grade classic deserving of some of the highest praise you can give. Xari Arena is a truly exceptional game that gives Warlords and Arkanoid a serious run for their money as the best Breakout-style games ever made. It's a tragedy that Atari cancelled this game, because with releases like this one and Tempest the 5200 might have gotten more of a following than it had. One of the 5200's biggest problems, after all, is that it didn't have a large enough exclusive library, as most of what Warner's Atari published for the system during the maybe 15 months they released games for the 5200 were games that were either enhanced Atari 2600 games, or didn't push the hardware all that much. This game is not like that, at all. This game was designed for the 5200, has exceptional analog controls that are great with a 5200 controller and are even better with the Trak-Ball, and, again, looks and sounds fantastic. Take the time to learn Xari Arena and hopefully you will love it. The game does take some time to learn, though. So, this is a one or two player game, for any mixture of two human and computer players. The standard game is for two players, you against a human or AI opponent, though you can play with nobody on the other side of the screen if you wish. Yes, you can set either player to AI. Player one is on the left side of the screen, and player two the right. On each side, there is a wall of bricks. You lose if your entire wall is destroyed. You control a paddle that the game calls an energy cell. Again, you can freely move around your half of the screen, but cannot move into the opponent's side. In addition to the two paddles, two kinds of objects move around the screen, spiral-shaped fireballs which will destroy the bricks in the two walls if they hit them but you can bounce with your paddle, and round target enemies called Xaris. Xaris stay around the middle part of the screen, but fireballs will go anywhere. When all Xaris in a level are destroyed, both players move on to the next level. A warp and counter in the center of the screen keeps track of how many of them are left. The game has 32 levels until it ends, so unlike most games of its era this game is not endless, you can win. Beating the game will be quite a challenge though, the difficulty level steadily increases as it goes along. The thing is, though, when you touch one of the Xaris you take damage unless you have touched a fireball. If you touch a Xari without any fireball power in your paddle, your paddle will have an 'exploding' animation for three seconds and won't bounce back anything, ball coming at your wall or target Xari. You do not want this to happen! So, you first need to absorb fireballs, which Xaris periodically shoot out. You can choose to absorb or bounce back fireballs with your controller, but will need to absorb some in order to survive contact with a Xari. Each time you touch a fireball you absorb it and a hit is added to your paddle, up to a maximum of four. Once you are filled up, balls you hit with the paddle will always bounce back towards the other side of the field. Also, if you touch a Xari, it will drop the paddle level by one, so you can use up your paddle's power to start clearing enemies once you have absorbed some balls. Alternately, you can try to hit the target enemies with fireballs you bounce back at them, as this will also destroy them if you make direct contact. Xaris are small so hitting them this way can be tricky, but it will happen. As a level goes on things will get more and more frenetic. With two dozen Xaris moving around and a whole bunch of fireballs all over, frantically trying to keep them from destroying your wall while also destroying the Xaris and bouncing back as many fireballs as possible is a significant challenge. It is also an incredibly fun one, though. For controls, you move around with the stick or trackball, reflect fireballs with the lower button if you are not carrying a full load of four but still want to bounce a ball back instead of absorbing it, and use a fire extinguisher shield with the upper button. Fire extinguishers shield your wall of bricks from damage for a moment and destroy all fireballs in or near your wall. You can only use your fire extinguisher a limited number of times, and the number is shown on screen. You get one more per level completed, and choosing when to strategically protect your wall with them is key to the games' strategy. This game starts out easy enough, but as you get farther in things get faster and faster and crazier and crazier. The screen can have like 25 targets and a dozen balls or more bouncing around, and trying to keep track of everything is quite a task! The player who destroys each Xari gets points for it. For the scoring, after each level, each player gets bonus points depending on how many blocks are left on their wall. There are also point bonuses. So, while both players may always be on the same level, the scores will show how well each one is doing. The two players may both be working towards the same goal of defeating all of the Xaris, but you still compete for score. Every few levels there is a little on-screen animation showing Xaris flying around, like the interrupt screens in Pac-Man. It's pretty cool stuff. Of course, there is one final one after you beat the game at level 32, if you can get that far. Interestingly, if one player dies, the other will keep going. The computer will continue by themselves if you die first. The graphics in Xari Arena remind me, more than anything, of a Williams arcade game like Robotron. In terms of visual design the Atari game designer working on this game clearly was heavily influenced by Robotron, for the better, and it shows here. From the paddles to the fireballs and Xaris to the font choices for the games' text, despite solid black backgrounds, Xari Arena has extremely bright and colorful graphics with a very strong graphical style that is both very of its time and also is timelessly beautiful looking. There's barely any slowdown at all, either; this game runs fast and smooth. The fire extinguisher sets off a wall of light along your side that looks really cool, too. The visual look of this game stands out from most other games on this console, it looks amazing and barely looks like an Atari game at all! If this console can do this, with this many things moving around on screen all the time and with this much flash, it's a real shame that games which pushed it were, for the most part, not released. As for audio, Xari Arena has both music and sound effects, so this is another point in its favor. The music is only decently good and not the best ever, but still, it's a solid track which fits the gameplay well and is very catchy and memorable. The sound effects are very well chosen and each one fits its use perfectly. This game has some of the best graphical and audio presentation on the Atari 5200, with games like this released the system could have been a hit. Overall, Xari Arena is a masterpiece. This game may be a bit complicated to explain, but spend a few minutes getting used to it and its genius quickly becomes apparent. The fantastic graphics and sound help, the system needed more of this and less barely enhanced 2600 ports, but the gameplay is the real star here. Xari Arena is a fast and frantic game with depth and absolutely brilliant design top to bottom. I still can't believe this was cancelled in this fully complete state! Warner Bros. really mismanaged the 5200 exceptionally badly, and their choice to not release this gem should be on the list of their mistakes. If you have a Trak-Ball controller for the 5200 this game is an absolute definite must have, buy a copy today. This is a perfect game for that controller. If you don't have a Trak-Ball, the game also plays quite well with the regular controller, though if you love games like this a Trak-Ball is a great investment. The Trak-Ball works extremely well and makes this amazing game even better. Buy Xari Arena today, there aren't many better games out there. This game was originally developed for the Atari 5200. A homebrew port for Atari 8-bit computers exists, but I can't imagine the game playing anywhere near as well on digital controllers. It also was included in Atari Flashback Classics: Volume 3 for PS4, Xbox One, Switch, and the modern Atari VCS computer. Rankings -------- The games this time are all quite good. Space Dungeon > Xari Arena > Tempest > Wizard of Wor > Star Wars: The Arcade Game > Vanguard Compared to the games from the previous two parts of this update, Space Dungeon and Xari Arena are the overall top two games in the batch. Tempest is fourth, only behind The Dreadnaught Factor. And the other three are good games in the mix with the system's higher-quality titles, with Wizard of Wor a good bit ahead of the last two. Overall Atari 5200 Top Ten -- 1. Defender 2. Space Dungeon 3. Xari Arena 4. Centipede 5. Galaxian 6. The Dreadnaught Factor 7. Tempest 8. Castle Crisis 9. RealSports Baseball 10. Moon Patrol Top Honorable Mentions: Super Cobra, Magical Fairy Force, Pitfall II: The Lost Caverns, Pole Position, Missile Command, Wizard of Wor Defender and Space Dungeon are A+ classics that are among the best games of the 1980s. Xari Arena, Centipede, and Galaxian are A grade hits deserving of high praise. And the other five are A- tier titles I like a lot. The Atari 5200 is a fantastic console that deserves a much better reputation than it gets. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johannesmutlu Posted August 8, 2022 Share Posted August 8, 2022 (edited) Well i also own the atari 5200 2 port version wich i do like,also since it has regular rf out and power input, i do like those games i bought for it such as mario bros,popeye,pole position,pac man,buck rogers,moon patrol etc,,, and yes 14 games were cancled for the 5200 BUT most of them were just games wich you could find on other systems such as jr pac man,milipede,astroids,battlezone,ET etc,,, so it likely wouldn’t have make much sense the controller was advanced for it’s time with forward features BUT atari should,ve never put the reset on the controller as it can get confusing overtimes in case you want to hit the pause or select button, and about that poke stick that it doesn’t centre probably thus causing drifts really hurts playing games such as pac man,even if i can get used to it,it’s just unfair, so i will beg those ones who can restore 5200 controllers,to also add in a spring to make it self centre this time, sure a can buy a homebrew 3D controller or adaptors to use regular atari 2600 and atari 7800 controllers to it,BUT those adaptors and 3D Printed controllers are freaking damn expensive., now about that storage compartment,it’s cool on paper to store your controllers in there BUT it’s hard to fully close the door with it because of those wires,even if they are sticking out,so i tout why not just store 5200 games in it instead,but due it’s oversized cartrides,i can only fit 1 game in it with the door closed,but i can store a whopping 5 atari 2600 or 7800 games it it with the door closed as well,mmm that’s pretty sad, but hey atleast you have to insert those cartrides with the label facing the playter, And those are just minor complains about it,and apart from that, it’s a must have for both atari,sega and nintendo fans(yes lady’s and gentlemen from now, both sega & nintendo had their own games on other systems back in the early 80’s before they had their own systems) so that’s why alone the 5200 is i must have, i sometimes hardly can believe it only sold 1 million units. Edited August 8, 2022 by johannesmutlu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyindrew Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 In 2021 I bought a new XBox Series S, Atari VCS and Collectorvision Phoenix. In January 2022 I walk into an old TV repair store here in Brooklyn and stumble upon a 4 port 5200 for sale, tested and refurbished. During the past 7 months I bought a refurbished controller and about 25 games. I have played my 5200 at least 10 times more than the XBox Series S. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phuzaxeman Posted August 21, 2022 Share Posted August 21, 2022 On 2/4/2022 at 10:54 AM, wongojack said: You pretty much nailed Pitfall II 100%. Even right down to the fact that after you play it and are frustrated by it, you still want to rank it up. Ugh the 5200 controller is definitely at its worst here. I have never managed to really play the 5200 version even though I've got a controller adapter that gives me digital controls. Someday I will work up the courage to scoot under those birds for a few hours. Actually, the most fun I've ever had with Pitfall II is using an emulator with save states to limit the frustration. I like the 5200 controllers with Pitfall 2. It works well for me. For the first Pitfall, I admit I have a hard time. And I don't usually have an issue because the 5200 controllers work well for me in all other games. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGHMW Posted August 22, 2022 Share Posted August 22, 2022 (edited) 9 hours ago, phuzaxeman said: I like the 5200 controllers with Pitfall 2. It works well for me. For the first Pitfall, I admit I have a hard time. And I don't usually have an issue because the 5200 controllers work well for me in all other games. I'll even admit that our CX52 dual-pot-based analog controllers, even those modded by Best, do have their iffy moments every once in a while but once you get used to the way they operate they can be pretty damn good. They maybe not the best ever but they do have their advantages in which SMOKE digital sticks (yes even the CX24 ProLine 7800 sticks despite them being of the same ergonomic design as the 5200 ones are), but you do have to develop a little bit of a delicate touch when it comes to playing analog-based games like Super Breakout, Kaboom!, Missile Command, Missile Command +, and the OG analog version of Gorf, but once you do, it's cruise control baby! Edited August 22, 2022 by BIGHMW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johannesmutlu Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 (edited) On 2/4/2022 at 8:02 AM, A Black Falcon said: Mario Bros. - 1 or 2 player simultaneous. Developed and published by Atari in 1983. Licensed from Nintendo. Mario Bros. is a port of Nintendo’s arcade game of the same name. Coleco stole home console rights for Donkey Kong and Donkey Kong Jr. away from Atari in the early ’80s, but Atari did manage to get the console rights to the next game in the series of sorts, Mario Bros. Atari released ports of the game on their consoles, the 2600 and 5200. Meanwhile, less popular Nintendo games Popeye and Sky Skipper were published on Atari consoles by Parker Bros. I covered Popeye for the 5200 previously, but Sky Skipper was unfortunately only on the 2600. But anyway, Atari’s 2600 and 5200 releases were the first American home console releases of Mario Bros. Nintendo would release a Famicom (NES) version of the game in in Japan in the same year as this one released here, but that would not see an American release until 1986. In the interim, this was one of the better ways to play the game here. Unfortunately for Atari, Mario Bros., while popular, was nowhere near the hit that Donkey Kong before it and Super Mario Bros. after it would be. This is a single-screen arcade game and while it is good, it has always been overshadowed by the games before and after it. Despite that, Atari did a good job with this port. While it is not arcade perfect and, much like Popeye, it doesn’t quite match up to the NES version, Mario Bros. is a great version of an early Nintendo classic. This game and its characters look a little funny, but I think the look works. The game plays well too. As in the arcade game, Mario Bros. takes place in a sewer. This is a single-screen platformer and you walk and jump around the four-level sewer. The game has digital controls and only one button, for jumping. Jumping is limited, in that you cannot control yourself in the air at all. What jump you do is determined before you leave the ground. That’s not like later Mario controls at all, but that is how this game plays. It certainly makes things tougher. Additionally, the digital controls make no use of the 5200 controller’s additional features. This game would surely be easier with a digital controller as you would get quicker response times, useful for avoiding the many enemies. I only have regular 5200 controllers and the Trak-Ball, though. The game plays okay, it just can take you a little longer to stop moving than you’d like. In that sewer, your goal in each screen is to defeat all of the enemies. You need to beat all of them to proceed. Your enemies are Koopas, crabs, fireballs, and various other foes. They start at pipes on the top level of the screen and move towards the bottom. Once they reach pipes on the bottom, they warp back up to the top. Very much unlike almost every game in the series since, you CANNOT jump on your foes here! Instead, you need to hit the platform an enemy is walking on from underneath to stun them. Then you can defeat them with a touch. As in Joust though, wait too long after stunning a foe and it will get back up. Some enemies need to be hit from underneath more than once to knock them out so you can defeat them. There is also a POW block on the screen you can hit from below three times. It will stun enemies. Use this power wisely though, for once you use it up it’s gone until the next level. The game gets hard quickly as your foes pile up and faster and tougher to beat enemies get added into the mix. Things may be a bit easier in the two player co-op mode, though. That’s a great feature to have. Mario Bros. is an addicting classic game. I’ve never loved this game, but it’s fun if you give it some time. This game is challenging, perhaps too much at times, but it’s easy to see why the game was successful. It’s challenging and well designed, and may keep you coming back. Its sequel would be one of the greatest and most important games ever made. This game is not that, but it is a good game certainly worth playing. Is this version in specific a must-play, though? Probably not. It’s neat to have as a Nintendo game on a non-Nintendo console, but there are many versions of Mario Bros. are out there, and quite a few are more arcade-perfect than this. Newer ports will control better than this, too. Even so, Mario Bros. for the 5200 is a good game well worth getting if you already have a 5200. Arcade port. This version is also on Atari 8-bit computers. This game is on many formats, including the NES, Commodore 64 (two different versions), Atari 2600, Atari 7800, NEC PC88, Sinclair XZ Spectrum, Apple II, Amstrad CPC, Game Boy Advance, and in arcade-perfect form on the Nintendo Switch. The game has only one sequel of sorts, Mario Clash for Virtual Boy. That is a pretty good game. Moon Patrol - 1 or 2 player simultaneous. Developed and published by Atari in 1983. Licensed from Williams, the original American publisher. The original arcade game was developed by Irem. Moon Patrol is another port of an arcade classic. Moon Patrol, one of the early Japanese scrolling shooting games, is a side-scrolling platform shooter where you drive to the right while jumping over obstacles and shooting enemies coming your way. The arcade game is simple, but plays well and was apparently one of the first with parallax scrolling backgrounds. The game has background music too, unlike many early arcade titles. This 5200 version is a lower resolution but very accurate port. Just like the arcade game, this version has parallax scrolling backgrounds and music in addition to the sound effects! The backgrounds are really nicely done. Your tank here is a somewhat funny-looking blob thing, but that's alright. Having music is particularly great, this system can do music but often games don't have it. The music is a simple loop but is catchy. In the game you control a moon tank. This is kind of an early auto-runner or shmup-on-wheels game, as you can't stop moving, only go a little faster or slower. This version both looks and plays great. It has nice graphics for the system with parallax scrolling, the controls are responsive, and it contains all the content from the arcade game. The controls are digital and not analog, but work well -- forward and backward on the stick make you go a little faster or slower to move your tank forwards or back, while one button shoots and the other jumps. Yes, jump is on a button. Take note, James Bond 007... but anyway. When you shoot, one bullet goes upwards to the top of the screen, while the other goes only a short distance forwards. Jumping, meanwhile, gives you good control of your jump. Your tank's hitbox is large though, so some later jumps are tricky. This is close to the arcade game and is worlds better than the extremely tricky, tight jumping of the Atari 2600 version. Nearly impossible jumps there are easy in this version. To make things even easier, this game has something very rare for an early '80s console port of an arcade game: continues! And infinite ones, at that. That's right, when you get game over you can start right off from close to where you died. Your score does reset when you continue, though. When you get a game over your time does NOT reset, however, and if you finish a level with a fast time you get a point bonus. The game rewards not dying. This game has two difficulty options, Beginning and Championship. Beginning is a single, easier run through the game. After you beat it you move on to the Championship course. Championship is harder and endlessly loops, so each time you finish a Championship course you start again. Every loop is very similar, though. Each loop of the game is broken up into five areas. You start at letter A. After you get to letters E, J, O, T, and Z, you get a screen showing how you did for that part of the game. In the game, you go to the right through 26 sections, each noted with one letter from the alphabet. In some waves flying enemy ships attack you from the skies, and you've got to shoot them down or avoid them until you get through to the next letter point. Some drop bombs that can blow holes in the ground you will need to jump over. In other waves, your main obstacles are rocks and pits. You need to jump over the pits and shoot or jump over the rocks. Because of your short forward shot distance, you need to really watch out for those rocks on the ground. Enemies in the air can be deadly, but it's the rocks and pits that often are the greater threat here. Eventually you will face more threats and some variation on the formula. The game starts out easy, and finishing Beginning mode won't take long. Championship is more challenging, but with the continue system it's beatable fairly quickly if you don't care about your score. Of course the game loops infinitely so you can always play for more points, though each letter's stage is always fairly similar. This is a simple but fun game. It's a game of quick reactions, as you try to avoid the obstacles coming at you while shooting down your enemies. It does not have the depth of a newer shooting game of course, but this is a very fun classic that is well worth playing. The game has very good graphics for the time, good music, and well designed and balanced enemies and obstacles to work your way past. Really my only issue with Moon Patrol is that it won't last all that long unless you get into playing for score. The game has quite a bit of variety, but with the static stage structure, between the good controls and continue system, unless you want to play this game for score it probably won't last all that long. Still, however long you play it for some version of Moon Patrol is a must-play for classic game fans and this is a great version of it. You can see how Irem would become one of the '80s better arcade game developers. Arcade port. This same version is also on the Atari 8-bit computers. Other ports are available on Atari 2600 (with very tough jumping controls), Apple II, Commodore 64, PC (DOS), Sord M5, Commodore VIC-20, TI99/4A, MSX, Atari ST, Game Boy / Game Boy Color (packed with a port of the NES version of Spy Hunter), and in perfect arcade port form on the PlayStation 4 and Nintendo Switch. There are likely more versions of this game out there than that as well. There is also an improved homebrew hack / remake of this 5200 version of the game called Moon Patrol Redux. I haven't played that one. Pitfall II: The Lost Caverns - 1 player. Developed and published by Activision in 1984. Pitfall II is a very ambitious game. A groundbreaking platformer when it released in 1984, Pitfall II has a large world to explore and a very modern-feeling continue system with infinite lives that send you back to the last checkpoint. It also is fairly open-ended and, I would say, extremely frustrating. This game was first released on the Atari 2600 and this is a port of that version with moderately upgraded graphics. The 2600 version used an added chip in the cart to get more out of the system, but nothing like that is needed here. The graphics have more detail, but it is clearly the same game. Controls are identical, so this is a digital-control game with one jump button and that's it. It would control much better with a digital controller than the standard analog pad I have, control in this game can be frustrating with the regular controller. As with the Atari 8-bit computer version of this game and only that version, though, Pitfall II for the 5200 has one major advantage over all other versions: it has a significant amount of exclusive added content! If you manage to get to what is the end of this game on any other platform, there is a whole second half of the game, full of more treasures to find and obstacles to avoid, that is just as big as the first half of the game, waiting for you. If you can get to the end of all that, this version has a much more satisfying ending than the 2600 game. Yes, this is one of the few 5200 games with a real ending. These are very cool additions which makes this almost certainly the best console version of this game, if you have a good controller for this kind of game. I do not, the standard 5200 controller has issues with this game. As for the game itself though, Pitfall II is a nonviolent exploration platformer. The world is a rectangular maze of screens, and you move around as Pitfall Harry, running, jumping, climbing, and swimming as you try to avoid all of the many enemies, save several people you need to rescue, and collect as much of the gold as you can find. Oddly, the game scrolls when you go up or down, but flips from screen to screen when you go between screens horizontally. Huh. Your goal is to rescue your niece and cat, get the rat, find a diamond ring, and then escape. Along the way, you want to try to collect as much of the gold as you can. This task will be more challenging than it is on the 2600, though, since you have twice as much game to get through to finish it. As with the first Pitfall, this game is set in a jungle. The map is dramatically more complex than before, though; where before the game was made of 265 nearly identical screens, this time there are fewer screens but each is totally unique, and they are, again, in a rectangle instead of a line. There are also water areas you can swim in which add some variety as well. There are also many ladders to climb up and down. These are very frustrating to use though, as you need to walk up to them while holding UP [or down] and forward to grab on to the ladder; if you just press forward you will fall into the hole the ladder is in, falling straight down until you hit a floor, water, or, frequently, an enemy who of course kills you instantly. The ladder controls are finicky stuff and really should be better. The ambition is obvious here, and a lot is accomplished. However, I find this game maybe more frustrating than it is fun. First, I mentioned the controls already. Those digital and one button-only controls are limiting and are not a great fit for the 5200 controller. I badly wish you could duck; that would make this game much better, I think. Also, this game is sometimes considered to be a proto-Metroidvania game. It does not have items which unlock areas, but it does have exploration. Compared to later titles in this genre this games' exploration is relatively straightforward once you get used to the game, as the game has a mostly linear path to follow with dead ends and smaller side areas along the way that may have gold in them for you to find if you want, but exploration still is a significant part of the game; it's up to you to figure out which are the side paths and which the main one. Again this game is fairly mild in this respect, but still, I do like some exploration in games but strongly prefer to know where I am going; I hate wandering around lost in a game! You can't get too lost in this game, but you can wander around aimlessly in some areas and that gets frustrating. You move slowly in this game so going to a dead end and back can take a while. Also, I know the treasure is optional, but I wish that it told you how many treasures you have. Figure it out yourself. It does have a score on screen, which increases each time you get a treasure, but this score will also go down so it's not a great measure of progress unless you aren't dying. At first I disliked how open the game feels, I want to know where to go. It made me want to not play the game, a common reaction I have to open-world games. However, once I realized that the game is actually fairly linear, I started to like it a bit more. The music is catchy, graphics decent, and some of the exploration is fun. However, while exploring and finding your way can be fun, as you remember which paths to take and where the gold is, the controls are slow and avoiding the enemies is very frustrating. Avoiding enemies requires very precise movement, you must be at the exact right spots to not get hit. And you will often be hit, and you die with one hit. So, even when I am starting to have fun exploring, the constant deaths get in the way. This game introduced the innovative concept of checkpoints in an open world, and they work. The issue is that they are quite far apart. Getting from one to the next without dying over and over and over will take a lot of practice. And when you die yet again and are sent all the way back to the last checkpoint it gets very frustrating. Trying to avoid the enemies and not die on the ladders or such can be really tough. All you can do is walk or jump, no ducking, no fighting back, and enemies are placed to run into you unless you do the exact right movements at just the right spots. For instance, bats fly just at head level, edging just barely higher at certain points so if you stand at the right spots you won't die. Frogs hop back and forth over ladder entrances, killing you if you slightly mess up your timing. And more. Many enemies were placed in order to make getting past them frustratingly hard. And every time you get hit it's all the way back to the last checkpoint for you. When you get hit, you watch Pitfall Harry float back to the checkpoint while a sad song plays while your points reduce down until you get back. The sad version of the song continues playing until you collect some gold. I often wish I could just fight the enemies to get them out of my way to get to some of the gold, but you can't. All you can do is just memorize where to jump that gets you over them. When you do finally work your way to a hard-to-get-to gold bar or person it is quite satisfying and may be worth the hassle, but this game has some definite drawbacks. Overall, Pitfall II is a classic, but you will need a great deal of patience and memorization to get very far in this game. A lot of people love this game, and I recognize the games' ambition and innovation, but between the design, controls, and controller, a lot of the time I find this game much more frustrating than fun. This is a game of exploration and avoidance, and is both simple and yet complex as you try to find out where to jump from and where to go in order to find all of the gold. So far I have not been dedicated enough to it to finish the game, but it is certainly well worth trying. Objectively, Pitfall II probably is a very good to borderline great classic. Subjectively, it's a very frustrating game I don't know that I want to play much more of. Expanded Atari 2600 port. Also on Atari 8-bit computers. Remember, only the 5200 and A8 versions of the game continue on with a second half after finishing the original game. Unexpanded ports of the 2600 version are also available on other platforms, including the Colecovision. Ratcatcher [Homebrew] - 1-3 player simultaneous. Homebrew game developed by Average Software (now Phaser Cat Games) and published by AtariAge in 2016. Ratcatcher is the first original 5200 game from Average Software's Ryan Whitmer, and I think it could be said that his inexperience shows here. His newer title Magical Fairy Force, which I covered last time, is a mostly pretty good game. This game, however, I find much more, well, average. Ratcatcher is a single-screen arcade style game, though this game is far too complex to have made a good arcade game; until reading the manual I didn't have a good sense of what was going on. Once you figure it out the game is alright, but has some design issues. First, though, I should mention that control here is entirely digital. Other than using two buttons this game does nothing with the 5200 controller. You could play the game with one button, but it would make an already hard game even harder. I should also say, perhaps the most interesting thing about this game is its three player simultaneous play. You will, of course, need a model 1 5200 to play with three players, but if you have one this is one of the few games to take advantage of those additional controller ports. As a solo game it definitely loses something, versus having other people on screen; this game feels better balanced for multiple people working together than for a solo player. You can play a single player game, though it will be harder. Anyway, in this game you play as one of three ratcatchers in a sewer. The graphics are sevicably decent and audio is basic. This game is about gameplay, not flash, though it looks alright. You need to avoid deadly obstacles, most notably a massive plague of sewer alligators, while doing as the games' name suggests and grabbing as many rats as you can. Each level has ten rats in it, and you get only one chance at each one. You must grab five rats before the level ends or you lose a life. Getting all ten sends you to a bonus stage full of points to collect before the next regular level returns to normal. You also lose a life if you touch a deadly obstacle such as a live alligator, a cloud of sewer gas, or electrified water. You get rats simply by touching them, unlike in reality they cannot hurt or attack you. They will run away from you when you walk towards them, though, so some strategy will be required. Indeed, strategy is the name of the game here. Ratcatcher takes place on a five-floor screen. Enemies will fill the lower three levels, while the top level is generally safe, at least at first. You can move left and right, but cannot jump; your only interaction is to turn some switches. There are several sets of these, water-wave switches in the center and gate-selection ones along the sides. For those side switches, if you stand in front of the switch by the sewer gates on either side of the screen, the two buttons will move selection lights up and down. One button moves the indicator up, and the other down, for quick selection of any of the four floors. If you walk through that gate, you will come through onto the selected floor. Walking in again will only send you back out that same gate, though, so you'll need to move the indicator again to go back to the floor you came from. You can have different floors selected on each side of the screen though, of course, and doing so is important. You can only change the selected floor at the correct side's gate switches, though, so thinking ahead is important. This can be frustrating though, as enemies will ambush you right after you go through a gate and there's nothing you can do, there's no way you'll be able to change floors and get through before that enemy gets to you. You do have some defenses against the hordes of alligators and other threats, however. First, there also is a water meter which rises over time. Two switches on the center of the top level will, once the water meter is full enough, send a wall of water across the screen, one switch for each direction. This wall of water will go out of the floor you have selected with the gate switches on the side and push anything on that floor as far over as it can. If you let the water meter overflow, it will set off a wall of water in one of the directions even if you don't hit a switch, also. The water will wash away all foes, though washed-away rats are lost and not captured so watch out for that. And last, there are six gates on the lower three levels that you can move up and down with switches on levels two and four. The gates are always there, you can only choose which floors they are on. For both the waves of water and the gates, your ratcatchers are affected; the water will wash you to the side of the screen, and you can't walk through those gates any more than the enemies can. So you need to plan ahead, though with the random nature of the way enemies appear from the sides of the levels this is difficult. You start with "only" having to deal with rats and alligators, but once sewer gas, electrified rats, and more, are added in this game gets tough. And really, that complexity is this games' downfall, I think. This kind of game is best when it is easy to understand and play, but while somewhat interesting, this game is definitely not easy to understand or play. You need to consider which floors to block with gates, when to use the walls of water, and most importantly which floors to set each sides' portals to, while trying to grab those rats and avoid everything else. And if you miss too many rats, you lose a life, and three lives lost and that's Game Over. Ratcatcher is a decent game once you learn how to play it and it certainly presents a good challenge, but it is probably a bit overly complicated and frustrating. It is far too easy to die without feeling like you did anything wrong simply because of unfair enemy spawns in a game where you can't always easily get away from foes. Due to its complexity and challenge Ratcatcher makes a poor first impression. You will lose, quickly, for some time. If you keep going and learn how to play it gets better, though, so if it sounds interesting it may be worth putting some time into, particularly if you have interested other players you can work with, so, say, one person can flip a gate switch while someone else gets the rat without being killed by an alligator right behind it as you would be in single player. This game feels better balanced for multiplayer than single player; as a single player game it is too hard and frustrating. Ratcatcher is, overall, an average game that may be worth a look if it sounds interesting. Atari 5200 homebrew game. This was first made for the 5200. An Atari 8-bit computer version also exists, I believe. The developer also made a PC version. RealSports Baseball - 1 or 2 player simultaneous. Has analog controls. Developed and published by Atari in 1983. In the early '80s, Atari started up a new line of sports games and called it the RealSports series. These games try to be more realistic than the early Atari 2600 sports games. There are RealSports games on the Atari 2600, 5200, and 7800, but of the games in the franchise this one, RealSports Baseball for the 5200, might have the overall best reputation. And after playing it, I get why! RealSports Baseball for 5200 is a great game, and is easily the best pre-crash sports game I own that isn't a tennis/pong game. This game has some flaws, most notably in how hard it is to score runs, but it is very good and holds up great. Baseball is my favorite sport, and this is a good baseball game. For reasons why, first, most early sports games were two player only. This game, however, has AI opposition to play against. The game has four difficulty levels too, to cover many skill levels. Even on the easiest setting beating the computer is difficult because of how hard scoring runs is, but there is still a nice skill gradient here. The game even allows an AI to play against an AI, if you want. Fun stuff. The game has a voiced umpire calling the balls, strikes, and outs, too, for a very nice touch. Voiced speech was rare in games at this point and it's a fantastic inclusion here. Now, this title does only have single games and not a season mode or such, but for this era that is to be expected. There also aren't named players or teams, just a red team and a blue team, and there is just one stadium. That's fine, the game has what it needs. For the time, AI and voice make for a pretty good feature set. As with most baseball games of the pre-crash era, RealSports Baseball for the 5200 is a single-screen game. Later on, baseball games would zoom in and have you basically field on a mini-map, while the zoomed in main screen showed just a part of the field. In this game, though, as with earlier titles, everything is on one screen. This means that the outfield is dramatically condensed down in size; outfielders look like they are standing right behind infielders. The game accounts for this by having the ball take a lot longer to be thrown from an outfielder to an infielder than from one infielder to another, so the real distance is taken into account even if visually it doesn't look that way. There are plusses and minuses to this approach. On the positive side, I have never liked the zoomed-in-field style of baseball games; I want to be able to see on the main screen where the ball is going. My favorite baseball game is Hardball III, which uses a single screen to show the whole vertical distance of the field. That game is newer and higher resolution and has a much more accurately-scaled field than this one, though, so the distances appear correct on screen in a way they don't here. So I kind of like this, but on the negative side, the small outfield makes getting balls to drop for hits much harder than it probably should be! Batting is one of the hardest things in sports, and this game makes successfully hitting the ball pretty hard since fielders almost always seem to be standing right where you hit the ball to. The small outfield here gets frustrating. Still, there's plenty of fun to be had. For batting, there is not a separate batting screen. Instead, the pitcher simply throws the ball towards the batter, who tries to hit it. You pitch by hitting the upper button to throw the ball. You then can control its motion with the stick while the ball flies towards the plate, though only along the horizontal axis; there isn't a vertical axis here for the ball. This makes things a little easier, but batting is still hard. The lower button throws the ball to a base, to try to pick off a runner. If the ball is hit the game automatically selects the closest player. You can change players with the lower button and throw with the upper one once you pick up the ball. The game automatically targets throws to the farthest base that a runner is running towards, which can be annoying at times when you want to go to a much closer base for the out, but you can change your target base with the lower button. Defense works well here and after a few games I wasn't giving up many runs against the easiest AI. When batting, you swing the bat by moving the stick on your controller horizontally from left to right. You need to have the stick start fully on the left side in order to properly swing, then move the stick at the right time to hit the ball. Your stick movement is fully analog, as you would expect on the 5200, for good control. This control scheme is kind of strange, but it works well once you get used to it. Atari would use this same control scheme in other RealSports baseball games, but it works much less well on a console with digital-only controls like the 7800 than it does here. Once you get the timing down for batting this game is fun, even if it is frustratingly hard to actually get enough hits to score many runs against the AI. Overall, RealSports Baseball is a great game. Games against the AI do tend to be low-scoring and victory is difficult, but the effort is rewarding and the controls and gameplay very good and well thought through. With two button and analog both supported here, this game makes good use of the 5200's controller. The voiced speech lines calling balls and strikes are also great and add a lot. This very much is an early title features-wise, but if you don't mind that RealSports Baseball is definitely recommended. This is great for its time and still is a lot of fun today. It's even better in multiplayer, of course. Atari 5200 exclusive. There are games on the Atari 2600 and 7800 with the same name as this game, but they are different games, neither one as good as this one. I covered the 7800 game years ago and did not have good things to say about it. Reading that summary again, I notice that that game shares a lot with this one, they just did everything worse there. RealSports Soccer - 1 or 2 player simultaneous. Has analog controls. Developed and published by Atari in 1983. RealSports Soccer works much less well than the baseball game above, unfortunately. I do not have nearly as much experience playing soccer games as I do baseball games, though I like the sport well enough, but this one... this is not very good. I haven't played many other pre-crash soccer games to compare this one to so perhaps it is fine for the time, but still, after a match or two of this I didn't want to go back. RealSports Soccer is just below average, not awful, but there is little reason to play it today. As you might expect, features-wise this game has one or two player play with four AI difficulty levels. As in RealSports Baseball, player one is the blue team and player two the red one. It has only single matches and no seasons, as with all sports games of its day. The game scrolls on a three screens long field. It's not large, but with how slow the characters move, that size is more than enough. The game does have isometric perspective for a more realistic field angle than most older games had and some nice player animation as they run around. The audio, however, is very simple and basic. You won't find any of Baseball's speech here! Each of the players, either human or AI, starts by controlling one of the two players at the kickoff. The two controlled players have different shirt colors from their teammates, to distinguish them. The ball and the two human or AI-controlled players are always on screen, along with three other AI-controlled players per team that you can switch to. Movement controls are analog, as you would hope for on the 5200, but I don't think that's enough to save this game. For the controls, when you have the ball, one button attempts a pass, and the other other a shot on goal. You can also aim shots high, medium, or low with the 1, 2, or 3 keys on the keypad. When your team has the ball, you always control the player with the ball. When you don't have the ball, you can switch between players with the 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9 keys on the keypad. Goalies are automatic and are always AI-controlled, you can only play as the other players. The thing is though, while visually this game is three on three, with, again, the ball and the two controlled players always on screen, as for the four AI-controlled players, when they go off screen they immediately come back on at some random location on the edge of the screen. This gives the sense that there are more team members here, but the game isn't actually keeping track of their locations; it's just randomly having people appear when one leaves. When one leaves on the right, the next one to enter will often be on the left. And of course the ball and the two controlled players never leave the screen. This results in a very stripped-down-feeling soccer game. Worse, this game is slow. The pace of play here is very sluggish and cannot be sped up. This makes the game somewhat boring to play. The game is easy, too. If RealSports Baseball is hard, RealSports Soccer is easy. Scoring goals is easy, and stopping the AI's team from scoring is maybe even easier. Beating the AI takes little effort on any difficulty. Maybe this is a bit better against a human opponent, but it's not very fun against the AI. The game does play okay -- you can run around, pass to your other players, and shoot on goal -- and apart from the slow speed the game looks nice, but with gameplay this slow and easy I don't really want to. Atari tried for some new things here, with the AI opponent, multiple shot angles ayou can shoot at, and such, throw-ins when the ball goes out of bounds, and more, so it may be a decent effort for the time, but the sluggish pace, lacking simulation, and very easy AI hold it back a lot. RealSports Soccer is a tedious, below average game not really worth playing. Atari 5200 exclusive. There is also an Atari 2600 game of the same name, but it's different. RealSports Tennis - 1 or 2 player simultaneous. Has analog controls. Trak-Ball controller supported. Developed and published by Atari in 1983. Tennis was the first sport made into an electronic game. At first you had games like Odyssey Tennis and Pong, simple ball-and-paddle games inspired by tennis, but by the early ’80s things had progressed into a somewhat more realistic simulation of the sport. And that is where this game gets a definitely mixed reception. RealSports Tennis has somewhat bland graphics, with a decent but unexciting isometric court and nicely animated players. As usual in the series, one player is blue and the other red. Yes, this game is singles tennis only, not doubles. You can actually give human players three-letter initials if you want, like in an Odyssey 2 game. Nice. There are no courtside graphics, just the green court on a dark red background. It has challenging AI to play against and allows you to play a full, five-game match of tennis. That’s all okay, though visually and aurally average at best. The controversy here is about the controls. Well, and also the AI. First, controls. In this game, you don’t just automatically hit the ball like you would in Pong Sports / Video Olympics on the 2600. Instead, you move around with full analog controls. You move with the stick or, if you have one, with the Trak-Ball’s ball. The trackball is a bit better of course, but either one works. Either way, the rest of the controls are on the keypad and buttons. To hit the ball, you need a well-timed button press. The button you press may be the regular side buttons or a keypad button, depending; this game makes heavy use of the side buttons. However, in order to serve you need to press the upper side button to serve. Having to go back and forth constantly between side buttons and keypad can get a little confusing at times. Still, serving is easy and you’ll pretty much always hit it in bounds on the serve. The upper side button will also hit the ball back the way it came on a similar angle. You can also hit a lob with the lower side button. However, if you press one of the buttons on the keypad instead during a volley, you will hit the ball towards that part of the opponent’s side of the court. Think of the nine numbers as aiming at the nine sections. With this you can control where the ball is going to a much greater extent than you can in older tennis games. That makes this game feel much more modern than its 1983 vintage. However, the way you do it is somewhat clumsy, with those keypad keys, and the controls take some definite getting used to thanks to how many buttons the game uses. I like having the ability to aim my shot, though. I think it adds to the game. The game was certainly designed around it, you will need to aim carefully to get the ball past the AI. It can be a fun challenge. However, the AI in this game is crushingly difficult! While winning games is possible, the AI gets to the ball almost all of the time. You really need to learn the game to be able to actually win sets. Just hitting the side buttons to hit the ball back the way it came won’t be good enough, aimed shots with the keypad are pretty much required. Some luck would help, as well. This is a somewhat slow-paced game, as the ball often feels like it’s moving slowly, but it does pick up at times. The game can get intense as volleys continue. I wish the AI was fairer but I’m sure that is very hard to do well on a machine from the early ’80s. On the whole I think this game is alright, but flawed. I like the greater control you get from being able to aim your shots, but beating the AI is frustrating and this isn’t the most exciting game. It’s a decent game maybe worth a look, particularly for two interested players. The controls will take getting used to though. Released on Atari 5200 and Atari 8-bit computer. That version looks similar, minus the analog character movement of course. There is also an Atari 2600 game of the same name, but it's different. River Raid – 1 player. Has analog controls. Developed and published by Activision in 1983. River Raid is a port of the very popular and successful Atari 2600 game of the same name. One of Activision’s biggest hits this side of Pitfall, River Raid was naturally ported to many formats and the 5200 is no exception. This port is, for the most part, a by-the-numbers port, largely identical to the original 2600 game except for improved graphical detail. The graphics are much sharper and clearer, this is a nice next-gen enhancement of the game. However, that’s not all. Activision did an interesting thing here — not only did they improve the graphics, they also made the controls fully analog. It’s a really nice change which has a very noticeable impact on the game. Or at least, movement left and right is now fully proportional and analog. Speed control feels more digital, as instead of gradient speed control you switch between set speeds depending on how much you push the stick up or down. Other than that, though, this is River Raid. River Raid is an early vertically-scrolling shmup. You fly a plane in narrow canyons over a river, shooting down enemy ships and tanks and destroying bridges at regular intervals. It was inspired by a famous bridge-attack raid from World War II. This is a simple game, with enemies that only sometimes attack you and relatively simple graphics and gameplay, but it is quite challenging and can be addictive. It is very easy to mess up and hit the walls, and that loses you a life just as fast as enemy bullets do. The game also has a fuel system. Your fuel meter steadily decreases as you go, and flying over fuel tanks refills it. Unlike Konami’s Scramble, you cannot refill fuel by shooting fuel tanks; you need to fly over them without shooting them, instead. Running out of fuel is initially rare, but the farther you get the easier it is to run low. You also will face some more aggressive foes as you get deeper into the game. As mentioned previously, with many 5200 games, this game is a last-gen port, from the 2600. Everything looks better and higher resolution here, with jagged coastlines with cliff faces along the edges of them and more detailed enemies to shoot, but it does not push the hardware as much as an exclusive would. River Raid is no match for the best shmups of the later ’80s, since the game is simple and lacks the depth of a Gradius or R-Type. In this game you just fly up and shoot the somewhat randomly laid out enemies the game throws at you while avoiding the walls. Still, River Raid is an addictive classic that still holds up fairly well. This game is not as complex as a next-gen exclusive like The Dreadnaught Factor, and I don’t like it quite as much as that game, but it’s still good. Enhanced last-gen ports have a place as well. The shooting and dodging gameplay of River Raid is timeless fun. Overall, River Raid is a good enhanced last-gen port. The game is simple, has held up well, and still is a lot of fun to play. I do find it a bit too simple to keep me going for longer play sessions, but it’s a good game to play here and there. I’m not sure if the analog controls make this game better than the 2600 version or not, but they do at least make it distinctly different and certainly are a lot better than the game would feel with digital controls on this system’s analog control stick. I think the results are good and make this version of the game well worth a try, thanks to the controls it’s a bit different from other versions of River Raid. Other than that though this version plays the same as the original. I’m sure more could have been done than they do here. Some of Activision’s games on the 5200 are more impressive than others, and this one is in the middle on that. Oh well, it’s still a good version of a great game. Atari 2600 port. Other ports were released on the Intellivision, Colecovision, Commodore 64, MSX, Sinclair ZX Spectrum, PC, and, as far as I know always in its Atari 2600 form, on numerous Activision collections for newer consoles from the last 25 years. Rankings These rankings are not absolute, but here's what I am thinking at the moment. RealSports Baseball > Moon Patrol > Pitfall II: The Lost Caverns > Mario Bros. > River Raid > RealSports Tennis > Ratcatcher > RealSports Soccer Including the games from part one, The Dreadnaught Factor > Castle Crisis > RealSports Baseball > Moon Patrol > Magical Fairy Force > Pitfall II: The Lost Caverns > Mario Bros. > Blaster > River Raid > RealSports Tennis > Ratcatcher > Decathlon > Frogger > Buck Rogers > James Bond 007 Of these, the game I ranked highest that I like playing the least is Pitfall II. I'm giving it a lot of benefit of the doubt for its ambition, clearly. Based purely on how fun I find it, it would go several spots lower. I do like mario bros on the 5200,it’s a great port,however there was supposedly a version of mariobros for the atari 400 BUT atari decided just to cancle it in favor for the 5200 in order to sell more 5200 systems,otherwise the 5200 system would,ve become obsolete since many games on that system did also came out on the atari 400,so it was a sad.but wise decission from atari to not release a atari 400 version of it,eventrough there was a prototyper version of mario bros for the atari 400,now another thing the atari 400 didn’t had was a trackball controller for it,but the atari 5200 did had a trackball controller,so that’s that,BUT i only wish atari just made that controller 1/3th big in size because that trackball controller is ridiculously huge in size,so i did made a mockup of it at how the way i want it,now if only it was supported by games such as mario bros and popeye etc,,, to add an extra more challange to those games, my life would,ve been complete🤣 Edited February 9 by johannesmutlu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundGammon Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Atari handed Coleco the rights to Donkey Kong and others by Ataris CEO Ray Kassar! He was grilled by his boss at Warner Communications and he asked Ray: "Why didn't you get the home rights to Donkey Kong?". Rays reply was: "Nintendo wanted $2.00 for every cartridge we sold!" His boss said: "At a profit of $17.00 a copy, we still would have made money!" I wonder today how Atari would have made Donkey Kong for the 2600 had they got the rights! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzip Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 On 2/10/2024 at 2:23 AM, SoundGammon said: Atari handed Coleco the rights to Donkey Kong and others by Ataris CEO Ray Kassar! He was grilled by his boss at Warner Communications and he asked Ray: "Why didn't you get the home rights to Donkey Kong?". Rays reply was: "Nintendo wanted $2.00 for every cartridge we sold!" His boss said: "At a profit of $17.00 a copy, we still would have made money!" I wonder today how Atari would have made Donkey Kong for the 2600 had they got the rights! And they could have easily charged a few bucks extra and people would have paid it because it was Donkey Kong. Not sure if Atari would have produced a better 2600 version though, Sounds like Garry Kitchen actually put a significant effort into the existing DK, even though everyone back in the day thought Coleco made it bad on purpose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundGammon Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 2 hours ago, zzip said: And they could have easily charged a few bucks extra and people would have paid it because it was Donkey Kong. Not sure if Atari would have produced a better 2600 version though, Sounds like Garry Kitchen actually put a significant effort into the existing DK, even though everyone back in the day thought Coleco made it bad on purpose. I also wonder if they would have included all 4 levels too! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Allan Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 On 2/10/2024 at 2:23 AM, SoundGammon said: Atari handed Coleco the rights to Donkey Kong and others by Ataris CEO Ray Kassar! He was grilled by his boss at Warner Communications and he asked Ray: "Why didn't you get the home rights to Donkey Kong?". Rays reply was: "Nintendo wanted $2.00 for every cartridge we sold!" His boss said: "At a profit of $17.00 a copy, we still would have made money!" I wonder today how Atari would have made Donkey Kong for the 2600 had they got the rights! See Pac-man for your answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.