Jump to content
IGNORED

Why did Atari not follow Percom Standard?


mytek

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have this code? I couldn't find it.

 

You can try here. That's an archive with all ROMs for the Mega Speedy project that includes the 1050 Turbo ROM (which you'll have to disassemble yourself).

 

Reportedly ABBUC got the code from the original author Bernhard Engl but I didn't find it on the webpage (but did not search very thoroughly).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Actually, the firmware is different. But then again, that depends on what you mean by the "same" or "different"... a few bytes here or there can be ignored or scrutinized.

 

If you have different dumps of the 1050 ROM, I would like to see. I am aware there are 2 or 3 releases, K, L, and M?

The release code is at location $FF9 in the ROM as an ASCII letter. You can also read it with the undocumented $24 diag command.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If you have different dumps of the 1050 ROM, I would like to see. I am aware there are 2 or 3 releases, K, L, and M?

The release code is at location $FF9 in the ROM as an ASCII letter. You can also read it with the undocumented $24 diag command.

 

I'll see if I can dump my WST version this weekend. I believe its listed as "REV 5" on the sticker. The Tandon K,L,M and possibly another are floating around in another thread discussing the 1050 or Indus ROM versions.

post-4566-0-88735200-1472264058_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that 1978 date may be misleading or not quite tell the whole story. I think Percom's did not come out for Atari until 1983

 

http://www.atarimagazines.com/creative/v9n6/114_An_alternative_to_the_Ata.php

 

Lot's of double density systems including IBM @160k and 180k SSDD and CP/M systems by then. Atari had its 815 on the drawing board and the 1050 wasn't designed in house. If I have it correctly, it was designed at Tandon and didn't become an Atari product until after the failure of the 815. So the 1050 was designed to compete with the 810 by Tandon so even the modest increase in capacity with 26 sectors/track was good'nuff. Still a less then optimum design given the technology available for several reasons. The voltage doubler circuit so it can use a 9 VAC supply, picking a 128 byte RAM. Certainly by 1982-3 the 1k & 2k static RAMs i.e. 6116s, were available and probably about the same price.

 

It's too bad about the 815, the board was clearly designed to support DSDD floppies, but they opted to leave the second RW head and supporting electronics unpopulated on the PCB. See for yourself - http://atariage.com/forums/topic/186285-atari-815-whats-inside/

Edited by fibrewire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...