+thegoldenband Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 Maybe it was the VGA-HDMI adaptor and not the Vizio? I'm quite sure the VGA-HDMI adapter added lag to the Dreamcast -- the Dreamcast emulator > VGA > HDMI combination was insanely laggy -- but I didn't use it for the Mac. (Instead I used a simple Mini DisplayPort > HDMI adapter.) I have no doubt the Vizio is adding at least 100ms of lag, at least through the HDMI input. HDMI is definitely alot slower then DVDI as i have tried both and is clearly noticeable but i use DVDI to eliminate that issue. Without a doubt you can't beat CRT and never will as it uses completely different technology; there will always be some input lag on modern screens. However having said that my LED TV is rated to have a 32ms input lag and when using DVDI the lag is hardly/if noticeable. Also i highly doubt using a decent emulator is any worse then real hardware on the same TV although personally i think emulators are more suited on modern screens to correct aspect ratios and filters. I have no figures but fairly sure the lag i experience is no worse then a modern day console on the TV if not less as DVDI is faster the HDMI anyway. Therefore it's definitely playable just not as responsive as real hardware on a CRT. I also believe good emulators try to reduce input lag and use sync corrections as much as possible because most people run then on modern screens, although im not 100% sure if thats true. Maybe Stephana or one the Stella devs could give us a little more information on the subject Not familiar with DVDI -- do you mean DVI, or is there a connector I don't know about? It wouldn't surprise me at all if DVI has much less lag, and it's what I use to connect my Mac to my LCD monitor (not TV). Before I did these experiments I figured the emulators I used probably added a frame or two of lag, no big deal, but I can't overemphasize how much better and crisper the controls felt when playing SMB on the CRT. I think a lot of people who think their reflexes have gone way downhill since childhood, i.e. when playing (for example) Punch-Out or the like, would be surprised how much better they feel when they go back to CRT. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DNA128k Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 I'm quite sure the VGA-HDMI adapter added lag to the Dreamcast, but I didn't use it for the Mac. Not familiar with DVDI -- do you mean DVI, or is there a connector I don't know about? It wouldn't surprise me at all if DVI has much less lag, and it's what I use to connect my Mac to my LCD monitor (not TV). Before I did these experiments I figured the emulators I used probably added a frame or two of lag, no big deal, but I can't overemphasize how much better and crisper the controls felt when playing SMB on the CRT. I think a lot of people who think their reflexes have gone way downhill since childhood, i.e. when playing (for example) Punch-Out or the like, would be surprised how much better they feel when they go back to CRT. I think DVDI may be DVI-D. Which would make sense, though electrically it should basically be the same as HDMI. Any analog to digital conversion is guaranteed to cause lag, VGA to HDMI being a good example. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+TwentySixHundred Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 (edited) Yes you're both correct i thought it looked strange when typing the comment but didn't bother to check Yeah DVI-D to VGA but it's a single cable without any converter like thegoldenband mentioned as a PC monitor cable. DVI-D plugs into the GFX. I have no idea why it's actually faster then HDMI because as far as i know the only difference is HDMI also carries audio and like DNA128k mentioned it should be the same. However there is definitely a difference in lag, well with my setup anyway; i tried HDMI to eliminate the 3.5 audio jack input cable but the lag was unbearable so i went back to DVI-D. Might have something to do with my GFX or the TV input via HDMI is just slower, no idea. Edited February 27, 2017 by Tony The 2600 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+TwentySixHundred Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 Maybe because it's the duel link that makes a performance difference? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepdreamin Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 Those measured lag ratings are probably only for the HDMI port (in game mode). True, but should give him a idea of how bad his set is. Analog hook up will be a bit slower. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.