+Hydro Thunder Posted September 11, 2022 Share Posted September 11, 2022 (edited) From your May post, -1... "The law firm representing Billy in the case asked the court for $226,014.96 for handling TG's anti-Slapp motion which was denied. The court approved only $598.96 of that $226,014.96 amount, which was for actual costs (e.g. court filing fees)." I mean, what is a better encapsulation of how this is going than that?? I can't believe this is still dragging on. Edited September 11, 2022 by Hydro Thunder Typo 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.