LinkoVitch Posted July 22, 2018 Share Posted July 22, 2018 It does seem weird (but not unbelievable) that the GPU core would be buggy around interrupts but not the DSP, they're not identical, but I'd have expected them to be mostly similar. What do you have running in the main loop whilst the interrupts are being fired? Perhaps try it with as minimal a main loop as possible? just a bunch of nops and a back to the start? Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4076340 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted July 23, 2018 Author Share Posted July 23, 2018 I checked it. And yepp, in an idle loop (only reading joypad ports) no issue. Added then some blitter code, still no issue. It happens only during gameplay. There is a lot more stuff happening with the blitter. Currently all happens redrawing happens in the VBL (not the interrupt, it just sets a flag). I still suspect my code but it is getting very unlikely. This really bugs me I do not like workarounds, they bite back someday. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4077164 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinkoVitch Posted July 23, 2018 Share Posted July 23, 2018 Perhaps try moving the game logic/pad reading etc, to the DSP and save the GPU for single fire stuff triggered from the DSP? Wonder if maybe there is a particular instruction that an interrupt happening when it's processing causes the issue (like MOVEI), and as you say your code is just being unlucky. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4077198 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zerosquare Posted July 23, 2018 Share Posted July 23, 2018 It happens only during gameplay.You could remove the gameplay. After all, you're writing a Jaguar game. 6 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4077304 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted July 25, 2018 Author Share Posted July 25, 2018 You could remove the gameplay. After all, you're writing a Jaguar game. I will push this comment and pop it when I found the bug. Then I laugh :-| 3 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4078724 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted July 25, 2018 Author Share Posted July 25, 2018 Perhaps try moving the game logic/pad reading etc, to the DSP and save the GPU for single fire stuff triggered from the DSP? Wonder if maybe there is a particular instruction that an interrupt happening when it's processing causes the issue (like MOVEI), and as you say your code is just being unlucky. I come closer. If I run my loop with VBL sync, no crash. If I remove the VBL sync and call my debug printhex (no blitter, plain GPU), it crashes. If I add some nop to my OBL interrupt code. It doesn't. I guess the reason is that I delay the timer interrupt. VBL every 20ms, timer every 1ms. I have to say: I am so happy I could buy a SKUNK board. Doing this with BJL only would be a hard thing. 4 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4078727 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinkoVitch Posted July 25, 2018 Share Posted July 25, 2018 Ah, so it could be that the 2nd interrupt is trying to fire whilst the first is still being serviced? When you say you add some nops, how many? I have had issues with alignment in my code before and had to add in extra nop or force alignment. I am trying to remember exactly what the cause was as obviously all opcodes are 16bit.. Ah I *think* it was I was trying to load from a non long aligned address (jump table), which it turns out the JRISC isn't a huge fan of doing IIRC. I had the jump tables within the text section, so if I added a nop or single instruction then it would knock the table out of alignment and BOOM.Skunks are nice, but I still think BJL has its place I am sure with a bit of work, some similar bi-directional comms for debug signalling could be achieved with BJL too (I too love having the ability to output hexdumps of registers/stacks etc from my debug libraries ) 2 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4078751 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted July 25, 2018 Author Share Posted July 25, 2018 (edited) Ah, so it could be that the 2nd interrupt is trying to fire whilst the first is still being serviced? When you say you add some nops, how many? I have had issues with alignment in my code before and had to add in extra nop or force alignment. I am trying to remember exactly what the cause was as obviously all opcodes are 16bit.. Ah I *think* it was I was trying to load from a non long aligned address (jump table), which it turns out the JRISC isn't a huge fan of doing IIRC. I had the jump tables within the text section, so if I added a nop or single instruction then it would knock the table out of alignment and BOOM. Skunks are nice, but I still think BJL has its place I am sure with a bit of work, some similar bi-directional comms for debug signalling could be achieved with BJL too (I too love having the ability to output hexdumps of registers/stacks etc from my debug libraries ) I added 5 nops. But it is no alignment issue (I think). Because if I put the nopS outside the execution path, the same crash happens. Yes, the GPU can only read 32bit aligned from internal RAM. I need to add a warning in lyxass as I fell into this trap as well. Regarding BJL, it is actually bi-directional. On the ST I wrote debjag (a bugaboo clone). You could dump registers, memory, single-step, disassemble and even had a line-assembler. But it is 68k so I never ported it to PC. BJL was planned as complete development tool-set. Well, the end of Atari came to early Edited July 25, 2018 by 42bs Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4078757 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinkoVitch Posted July 25, 2018 Share Posted July 25, 2018 The nops wouldn't have to be in the execution path, anywhere in text would shift the rest of the code on by 2-bytes. (which is how I first twigged the issue as changing non-called code broke or fixed the issue).Yup exactly what I was meaning Update lo.exe to have a debug/console mode like skunk and some lib to run on the jag and bingo. Atari will never die whilst we hack around with it! (well real Atari, not the sham that currently wields the name!) 3 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4078798 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zerosquare Posted July 26, 2018 Share Posted July 26, 2018 SCPCD wrote a debugger that works over BJL. But I don't think he released it publicly. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4079778 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted July 27, 2018 Author Share Posted July 27, 2018 Matthias gave me the hint to look into the DOOM sources. That's what they do: bclr #3,r29 ; clear IMASK bset #12,r29 ; and interrupt latch load (r31),r28 ; get last instruction address move R0_INTSTACK,r31 ; reset stack So, they do not increment the stack pointer. Rather reset it. Which is what I do in my workaround. I guess a clearer sign for a silicon bug is not possible. :-) We should spread this as warning in the f0rum. 2 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4080184 Share on other sites More sharing options...
+CyranoJ Posted July 27, 2018 Share Posted July 27, 2018 I guess it's only a problem with multiple interrupts. Weird how the DSP isn't affected, though. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4080189 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted July 27, 2018 Author Share Posted July 27, 2018 I guess it's only a problem with multiple interrupts. Weird how the DSP isn't affected, though. At least the DOOM source does the same for the DSP. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4080191 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinkoVitch Posted July 27, 2018 Share Posted July 27, 2018 I guess they hit the problem on the GPU and just assumed it would be the same on the DSP. I am so glad it doesn't seem to be! I wonder if the bug is the same on the different GPU versions. Perhaps (in my instance anyway), as all the interrupts are timer based there is no issue, perhaps the external interrupts are the cause? Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4080222 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted July 27, 2018 Author Share Posted July 27, 2018 I guess they hit the problem on the GPU and just assumed it would be the same on the DSP. I am so glad it doesn't seem to be! I wonder if the bug is the same on the different GPU versions. Perhaps (in my instance anyway), as all the interrupts are timer based there is no issue, perhaps the external interrupts are the cause? Since the bug happens on high-frequency interrupts it should happen on the DSP early as the playback uses a 22kHz or 44kHz interrupt, right? But I think even though the ISA is quiet equal, the DSP is different in so many parts, that it is likely the bug is only in the GPU. If you just think of the bus width, memory size etc. . So I doubt they used the same RTL for both chips. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4080230 Share on other sites More sharing options...
swapd0 Posted July 27, 2018 Share Posted July 27, 2018 off topic I also wrote a BJL debugger (for 68000, GPU & DPS), with a BeOS client. Maybe some day I'll procrastinate less and port it to OS-X. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4080279 Share on other sites More sharing options...
+CyranoJ Posted July 27, 2018 Share Posted July 27, 2018 off topic I also wrote a BJL debugger (for 68000, GPU & DPS), with a BeOS client. It was you! You were the single user! 3 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4080283 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted July 27, 2018 Author Share Posted July 27, 2018 off topic I also wrote a BJL debugger (for 68000, GPU & DPS), with a BeOS client. Maybe some day I'll procrastinate less and port it to OS-X. BeOS? Well, isn't programming the Jaguar pain enough *rotfl* Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4080289 Share on other sites More sharing options...
JagMod Posted July 28, 2018 Share Posted July 28, 2018 Since the bug happens on high-frequency interrupts it should happen on the DSP early as the playback uses a 22kHz or 44kHz interrupt, right? But I think even though the ISA is quiet equal, the DSP is different in so many parts, that it is likely the bug is only in the GPU. If you just think of the bus width, memory size etc. . So I doubt they used the same RTL for both chips. I've been following this thread. I checked my code and I am doing what you were, not what DOOM is. I have two interrupts turned on in the GPU, one from the OP, the other from the Blitter. The OP interrupts once per vblank, the blitter interrupts ~10,000 times in a vblank. So maybe it isn't a frequency problem as much as it is which interrupts are being used. I've never used the timer interrupt with the GPU. You said you were doing 1ms timer interrupts. (1000 times a second) The Blitter is interrupting in the 60k to 80k times a second, and I've never seen this bug. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4080856 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted July 28, 2018 Author Share Posted July 28, 2018 I've been following this thread. I checked my code and I am doing what you were, not what DOOM is. I have two interrupts turned on in the GPU, one from the OP, the other from the Blitter. The OP interrupts once per vblank, the blitter interrupts ~10,000 times in a vblank. So maybe it isn't a frequency problem as much as it is which interrupts are being used. I've never used the timer interrupt with the GPU. You said you were doing 1ms timer interrupts. (1000 times a second) The Blitter is interrupting in the 60k to 80k times a second, and I've never seen this bug. Wow, I never found a use case for the blitter interrupt. I guess you are setting up a kind of task list and on every interrupt you setup another blitter job from this list? And, yes, it is only a 1000 times But good to know, that it should work. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4080859 Share on other sites More sharing options...
swapd0 Posted January 25, 2019 Share Posted January 25, 2019 I got some weird bug with my rasters. This works. start:: movei #_hdma_colors,r0 movei #CLUT,r2 movei #G_FLAGS,r3 movei #OBF,r4 movei #G_ENDRAM-32,r31 ; enable OP interrupt load (r3),r29 bset #7,r29 store r29,(r3) moveta r0,r0 moveta r2,r2 moveta r3,r3 moveta r4,r4 moveta r31,r31 movei #G_ENDRAM,r31 nop nop .loop: nop nop nop nop jr T,.loop nop But if I remove the nop loop and have some normal code that touches the registers (I never move to the alternative bank), the rasters get random colours (r0 it's smashed and get some random memory) Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4205820 Share on other sites More sharing options...
swapd0 Posted January 25, 2019 Share Posted January 25, 2019 By the way, I've to use different stack pointers (r31) for interrupts and normal code or it got hang. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4205821 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted January 25, 2019 Author Share Posted January 25, 2019 (edited) As for interrupts: r31/r30 get destroyed. I learned the hard way that the "normal" way of stack handling is buggy. Best is to reload the stack pointer instead of assuming it was decremented. I use r31 as backup for r31.a (the actual interrupt stack pointer). I use two stacks, so the interrupts will not mess up with foreground subroutine calling. My OP interrupt looks like this then: IRQ_SP REG 31 IRQ_SP.a REG 31 IRQ_RTS.a REG 30 IRQ_FLAGADDR.a REG 29 IRQ_FLAG.a REG 28 IRQScratch4.a REG 4 IRQScratch3.a REG 3 IRQScratch2.a REG 2 IRQScratch1.a REG 1 IRQScratch0.a REG 0 ;;; ---------------------------------------- ;;; OBJECT interrupt ;;; ---------------------------------------- org $f03030 load (IRQ_FLAGADDR.a),IRQ_FLAG.a movei #obj_irq,IRQScratch0.a bset #12,IRQ_FLAG.a load (IRQ_SP.a),IRQ_RTS.a jump (IRQScratch0.a) bclr #3,IRQ_FLAG.a ;; .... ;;; ---------------------------------------- ;;; OBJECT interrupt ;;; ---------------------------------------- obj_irq:: movefa IRQ_SP,IRQ_SP.a ; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< reload SP, no SP++ !!! addqt #2,IRQ_RTS.a ;--------------- movei #OBF,IRQScratch0.a storew IRQScratch1.a,(IRQScratch0.a) ; resume OP ;--------------- movei #OBL,IRQScratch0.a movei #OBL0,IRQScratch1.a movei #AnzObjekte*4,IRQScratch2.a loadp (IRQScratch1.a),IRQScratch3.a .loop addq #8,IRQScratch1.a subq #1,IRQScratch2.a storep IRQScratch3.a,(IRQScratch0.a) addqt #8,IRQScratch0.a jr nz,.loop loadp (IRQScratch1.a),IRQScratch3.a ;--------------- .exit jump (IRQ_RTS.a) store IRQ_FLAG.a,(IRQ_FLAGADDR.a) .a => register in alternative bank [Edit:] I place the IRQ stack on top (as it is usually only 4 bytes deep), and the normal stack below, not vice versa. Edited January 25, 2019 by 42bs 1 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4205845 Share on other sites More sharing options...
swapd0 Posted January 25, 2019 Share Posted January 25, 2019 I don't know but it looks like the interrupt it's running using the same register bank as the normal code, because I can see the sprites if I don't have an OP interrupt, but with an GPU Object I can't see anything, and now it hangs... WTF!?!? Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4205938 Share on other sites More sharing options...
swapd0 Posted January 25, 2019 Share Posted January 25, 2019 sprite list with the 68000 & rasters on (GPU) ---> works sprite list with the GPU & rasters off ---> works sprite list with the GPU & rasters on (GPU) ---> black screen but the game it's running. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/280454-gpu-with-mutiple-interrupts/page/2/#findComment-4205942 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.