Jump to content
IGNORED

#FujiNet Hardware Discussion


Recommended Posts

I've finally got a 'working' prototype built using 2 sn74ls07 buffers to separate the FujiNet from the Atari. The buffer chips are only powered when FujiNet is ON by using some transistors and this fixes the back power issue.

 

IMG_20201003_154007873_1.thumb.jpg.11ce45d48861b8b4e27df7a6d13784b6.jpg

 

I unfortunately have a new issue with this setup. The FujiNet alone on the SIO bus works great, but when I connect another drive there is some questionable boot sounds. Also, I've noticed this on the v1.1 boards I made with the 2 line buffer. Any ideas what is happening here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not an engineer, but if you are referring to the strange SIO loading stutter, it sounds like a buffer delayed sound.  Maybe the Fujinet isn't actually separated from the bus.  Could the 07 chip actually be buffering both the Fujinet and the second SIO device?

 

On another topic..... what board assembler did you use to have the Fujinet pcbs assembled?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I got a little lost in the tech speak. I understand some of the capabilities such as WiFi and printing to PDF you can download to your PC, and well as statements about the ability to play cas, xex, atr and atx. However, I have an older SDrive Max and was considering getting a newer one with the upgrades and I'm wondering if,

1. via WiFi and software on your PC, can the FujiNet do all that the SDrive Max can, except wirelessly from your PC.

2. Would it work like the SIO2PC, except via WiFi? Would it use APE?

3. Does it function okay with a bunch of daisy chained peripherals, like the newer SDriveMax?

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Swami said:

Sorry, I got a little lost in the tech speak. I understand some of the capabilities such as WiFi and printing to PDF you can download to your PC, and well as statements about the ability to play cas, xex, atr and atx. However, I have an older SDrive Max and was considering getting a newer one with the upgrades and I'm wondering if,

1. via WiFi and software on your PC, can the FujiNet do all that the SDrive Max can, except wirelessly from your PC.

It has a micro SD slot on it like the SDrive-Max does, you can literally pull the card out of your SDrive, put it in your Fujinet, add the "SD" device to the Fujinet host list and carry on just like you did on the SDrive (but better with long filename support etc.)

 

Quote

2. Would it work like the SIO2PC, except via WiFi? Would it use APE?

No it doesn't work like SIO2PC at all. You can set up a bit of software on your PC called TNFSD which you point to a directory on your computer, while TNFSD is running you can point your Fujinet at it and browse that directory on your Atari just like you would browse the SD card on your SDrive. If you want to add something new, just put it in the shared directory and it instantly becomes visible on your atari.


There is nothing to stop you making the TNFSD service publicly available if you want (you might want to make it read only if you do that) and there are a few people who have done this. You can connect your Fujinet to their TNFS service and you can browse those directories just like you can browse your SD card.

 

I usually create save disks on my SD card and load my software from my read only TNFS server at Fujinet.Atari8bit.net. You can see server stats for it at https://atari8bit.net/fujinet/ it might help you visualise what is going on.

 

*All this is optional, you can just use your SD card if you prefer. There is noting stopping you from just using it as an SDrive replacement with built in wifi-modem and printer emulation if you like. All the extra functionality is there for when you find you need it.

 

Quote

3. Does it function okay with a bunch of daisy chained peripherals, like the newer SDriveMax?

 

Thanks!

Yes it does, there is a known issue for people who own a 1088XEL which is fixed in the next hardware revision, if you don't have a 1088XEL you don't need to worry about that.

 

 

EDIT: I made this a while ago, sorry for the slow pacing.

 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I decided to build one using spare ESP-Wroom that I had. Last year I built with ESP8266 so this time Wroom. I know, current status is Wrover but some things should work still on that board.

I downloaded flasher (I'm using Linux) but it fails to flash using GUI. Here is output.

Using '/dev/ttyUSB0' as serial port.
Using latest firmware from fujinet.online..
Connecting........_
Detecting chip type... ESP32
Connecting........_

Chip Info:
 - Chip Family: ESP32
 - Chip Model: ESP32D0WDQ5 (revision 1)
 - Number of Cores: 2
 - Max CPU Frequency: 80MHz
 - Has Bluetooth: YES
 - Has Embedded Flash: NO
 - Has Factory-Calibrated ADC: NO
 - MAC Address: 30:AE:A4:97:F7:C0
Uploading stub...
Running stub...
Stub running...
Changing baud rate to 460800
Changed.
 - Flash Size: 4MB
 - Firware path: Latest from fujinet.online
 - Flash Mode: dio
 - Flash Frequency: 40MHz
Erasing flash (this may take a while)...
Chip erase completed successfully in 9.1s
Unexpected error: '_io.BytesIO' object has no attribute 'name'

I believe that error is because latest firmware does not support WROOM anymore.

 

I also tried command line version with files downloaded from https://fujinet.online/firmware-dl/

$ sudo ./FujiNet-Flasher -p /dev/ttyUSB0 --esp32 --bootloader bootloader.bin --partitions partitions.bin --spiffs spiffs.bin --show-logs firmware.bin 
Using '/dev/ttyUSB0' as serial port.
Showing logs:

But it sits like that, nothing more shows up. `ps` shows that it forked additional processes but that's all

$ ps aux| grep Fuji
root       89851  0.1  0.1  11452  4460 pts/1    S+   12:39   0:00 sudo ./FujiNet-Flasher -p /dev/ttyUSB0 --esp32 --bootloader bootloader.bin --partitions partitions.bin --spiffs spiffs.bin --show-logs firmware.bin
root       89852 13.9  0.4  19480 18288 pts/1    S+   12:39   0:02 ./FujiNet-Flasher -p /dev/ttyUSB0 --esp32 --bootloader bootloader.bin --partitions partitions.bin --spiffs spiffs.bin --show-logs firmware.bin
root       89854  4.2  0.4  47816 16236 pts/1    S+   12:39   0:00 ./FujiNet-Flasher -p /dev/ttyUSB0 --esp32 --bootloader bootloader.bin --partitions partitions.bin --spiffs spiffs.bin --show-logs firmware.bin

What is the process to flash latest WROOM version?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, myriadcs said:

I believe that error is because latest firmware does not support WROOM anymore.

Correct. The flash tool only supports WROVER boards with 8MB PSRAM and 16MB flash

33 minutes ago, myriadcs said:

What is the process to flash latest WROOM version?

WROOM is not supported. You are welcome to fork the code and make it work if you like, but we are not supporting it. You can follow the instructions to build the code yourself https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/fujinet-platformio/wiki/Board-bring-up-for-FujiNet-Platform.IO-code and you need to checkout the code from https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/fujinet-platformio/releases/tag/v0.1.ccbb292f.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mozzwald said:

Correct. The flash tool only supports WROVER boards with 8MB PSRAM and 16MB flash

WROOM is not supported. You are welcome to fork the code and make it work if you like, but we are not supporting it. You can follow the instructions to build the code yourself https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/fujinet-platformio/wiki/Board-bring-up-for-FujiNet-Platform.IO-code and you need to checkout the code from https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/fujinet-platformio/releases/tag/v0.1.ccbb292f.

Sure, I can build that, will be good experience :) Just wanted to confirm that my command line switches are ok, and it will work once I will recompile that.

One thing worries me that It just stuck in CLI, without any information what is happening and no errors indicated. Is there a verbose mode so it's easier to trouble shoot?

GUI seems be better as it marked error and stopped, CLI didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, myriadcs said:

Sure, I can build that, will be good experience :) Just wanted to confirm that my command line switches are ok, and it will work once I will recompile that.

One thing worries me that It just stuck in CLI, without any information what is happening and no errors indicated. Is there a verbose mode so it's easier to trouble shoot?

GUI seems be better as it marked error and stopped, CLI didn't.

I've not used the command line tool myself so I can't help you there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I managed to compile that firmware. I could not use GUI flasher as it's configured for bigger boards.

After compilation, in .pio/build/fujinet-wroom/ I had 4 files:

 

bootloader.bin
partitions.bin
spiffs.bin

firmware.bin

 

boot_app0.bin was taken from https://fujinet.online/firmware-dl/ Is that version ok for WROOM? 

 

I've used esptool with following offsets: 

esptool.py write_flash 0x1000 ./bootloader.bin 0x8000 ./partitions.bin 0xE000 ./boot_app0.bin 0x10000 ./firmware.bin 0x200000 ./spiffs.bin

I had to play w bit with these offsets to fit. Command output look ok:

esptool.py v2.6
Found 1 serial ports
Serial port /dev/ttyUSB0
Connecting........_____....._____..
Detecting chip type... ESP32
Chip is ESP32D0WDQ5 (revision 1)
Features: WiFi, BT, Dual Core, Coding Scheme None
MAC: 30:30:30:30:30:30
Uploading stub...
Running stub...
Stub running...
Configuring flash size...
Auto-detected Flash size: 4MB
Compressed 26960 bytes to 16219...
Wrote 26960 bytes (16219 compressed) at 0x00001000 in 1.4 seconds (effective 150.4 kbit/s)...
Hash of data verified.
Compressed 3072 bytes to 119...
Wrote 3072 bytes (119 compressed) at 0x00008000 in 0.0 seconds (effective 1544.3 kbit/s)...
Hash of data verified.
Compressed 8192 bytes to 47...
Wrote 8192 bytes (47 compressed) at 0x0000e000 in 0.0 seconds (effective 7258.3 kbit/s)...
Hash of data verified.
Compressed 1960832 bytes to 1137946...
Wrote 1960832 bytes (1137946 compressed) at 0x00010000 in 101.3 seconds (effective 154.9 kbit/s)...
Hash of data verified.
Compressed 1769472 bytes to 339295...
Wrote 1769472 bytes (339295 compressed) at 0x00200000 in 30.2 seconds (effective 469.1 kbit/s)...
Hash of data verified.

Leaving...
Hard resetting via RTS pin...

 

It flashed but something is not ok, here is debug output:

rst:0xc (SW_CPU_RESET),boot:0x13 (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT)
configsip: 0, SPIWP:0xee
clk_drv:0x00,q_drv:0x00,d_drv:0x00,cs0_drv:0x00,hd_drv:0x00,wp_drv:0x00
mode:DIO, clock div:2
load:0x3fff0030,len:4
load:0x3fff0034,len:5532
load:0x40078000,len:16488
load:0x40080400,len:4840
entry 0x400806a4
E (657) spiram: SPI RAM enabled but initialization failed. Bailing out.
E (666) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (666) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (666) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (670) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (675) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (680) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (685) uart: _����垠8�(����R��`D0` @`��̀��<@$��$$"�Dz�ets Jun  8 2016 00:22:57

rst:0xc (SW_CPU_RESET),boot:0x13 (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT)
configsip: 0, SPIWP:0xee
clk_drv:0x00,q_drv:0x00,d_drv:0x00,cs0_drv:0x00,hd_drv:0x00,wp_drv:0x00
mode:DIO, clock div:2
load:0x3fff0030,len:4
load:0x3fff0034,len:5532
load:0x40078000,len:16488
load:0x40080400,len:4840
entry 0x400806a4

I have tried with different offsets as well

esptool.py write_flash 0x0000 ./bootloader.bin 0x8000 ./partitions.bin 0xE000 ./boot_app0.bin 0x10000 ./firmware.bin 0x250000 ./spiffs.bin

But it also failed, different error this time.

rst:0x10 (RTCWDT_RTC_RESET),boot:0x13 (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT)
flash read err, 1000
ets_main.c 371 
ets Jun  8 2016 00:22:57

I guess some of the offsets are not ok. Any idea which one? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, myriadcs said:

I managed to compile that firmware. I could not use GUI flasher as it's configured for bigger boards.

After compilation, in .pio/build/fujinet-wroom/ I had 4 files:

 

bootloader.bin
partitions.bin
spiffs.bin

firmware.bin

 

boot_app0.bin was taken from https://fujinet.online/firmware-dl/ Is that version ok for WROOM? 

 

I've used esptool with following offsets: 


esptool.py write_flash 0x1000 ./bootloader.bin 0x8000 ./partitions.bin 0xE000 ./boot_app0.bin 0x10000 ./firmware.bin 0x200000 ./spiffs.bin

I had to play w bit with these offsets to fit. Command output look ok:


esptool.py v2.6
Found 1 serial ports
Serial port /dev/ttyUSB0
Connecting........_____....._____..
Detecting chip type... ESP32
Chip is ESP32D0WDQ5 (revision 1)
Features: WiFi, BT, Dual Core, Coding Scheme None
MAC: 30:30:30:30:30:30
Uploading stub...
Running stub...
Stub running...
Configuring flash size...
Auto-detected Flash size: 4MB
Compressed 26960 bytes to 16219...
Wrote 26960 bytes (16219 compressed) at 0x00001000 in 1.4 seconds (effective 150.4 kbit/s)...
Hash of data verified.
Compressed 3072 bytes to 119...
Wrote 3072 bytes (119 compressed) at 0x00008000 in 0.0 seconds (effective 1544.3 kbit/s)...
Hash of data verified.
Compressed 8192 bytes to 47...
Wrote 8192 bytes (47 compressed) at 0x0000e000 in 0.0 seconds (effective 7258.3 kbit/s)...
Hash of data verified.
Compressed 1960832 bytes to 1137946...
Wrote 1960832 bytes (1137946 compressed) at 0x00010000 in 101.3 seconds (effective 154.9 kbit/s)...
Hash of data verified.
Compressed 1769472 bytes to 339295...
Wrote 1769472 bytes (339295 compressed) at 0x00200000 in 30.2 seconds (effective 469.1 kbit/s)...
Hash of data verified.

Leaving...
Hard resetting via RTS pin...

 

It flashed but something is not ok, here is debug output:


rst:0xc (SW_CPU_RESET),boot:0x13 (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT)
configsip: 0, SPIWP:0xee
clk_drv:0x00,q_drv:0x00,d_drv:0x00,cs0_drv:0x00,hd_drv:0x00,wp_drv:0x00
mode:DIO, clock div:2
load:0x3fff0030,len:4
load:0x3fff0034,len:5532
load:0x40078000,len:16488
load:0x40080400,len:4840
entry 0x400806a4
E (657) spiram: SPI RAM enabled but initialization failed. Bailing out.
E (666) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (666) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (666) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (670) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (675) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (680) uart: uart_write_bytes(1111): uart driver error
E (685) uart: _����垠8�(����R��`D0` @`��̀��<@$��$$"�Dz�ets Jun  8 2016 00:22:57

rst:0xc (SW_CPU_RESET),boot:0x13 (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT)
configsip: 0, SPIWP:0xee
clk_drv:0x00,q_drv:0x00,d_drv:0x00,cs0_drv:0x00,hd_drv:0x00,wp_drv:0x00
mode:DIO, clock div:2
load:0x3fff0030,len:4
load:0x3fff0034,len:5532
load:0x40078000,len:16488
load:0x40080400,len:4840
entry 0x400806a4

I have tried with different offsets as well


esptool.py write_flash 0x0000 ./bootloader.bin 0x8000 ./partitions.bin 0xE000 ./boot_app0.bin 0x10000 ./firmware.bin 0x250000 ./spiffs.bin

But it also failed, different error this time.


rst:0x10 (RTCWDT_RTC_RESET),boot:0x13 (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT)
flash read err, 1000
ets_main.c 371 
ets Jun  8 2016 00:22:57

I guess some of the offsets are not ok. Any idea which one? :)

The code now assumes there is PSRAM. If you want to build for your WROOM, you'll need to fork from before the 1.0 tag:

https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/fujinet-platformio/tree/9aca28d29c863e7145e1c5429979a1705f373434

 

-Thom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, tschak909 said:

The code now assumes there is PSRAM. If you want to build for your WROOM, you'll need to fork from before the 1.0 tag:

https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/fujinet-platformio/tree/9aca28d29c863e7145e1c5429979a1705f373434

 

-Thom

I have used that code https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/fujinet-platformio/releases/tag/v0.1.ccbb292f 

I can switch to commit you mentioned and test it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tschak909 said:

The key is to look for BOARD_HAS_PSRAM #ifdefs

-Thom

My board definition looks like:

$ cat boards/fujinet-wroom.json 
{
  "build": {
    "arduino":{
      "ldscript": "esp32_out.ld"
    },
    "core": "esp32",
    "extra_flags": "-DARDUINO_ESP32_DEV",
    "f_cpu": "240000000L",
    "f_flash": "40000000L",
    "flash_mode": "dio",
    "mcu": "esp32",
    "variant": "esp32",
    "partitions": "fujinet_partitions_4MB.csv"
  },
  "connectivity": [
    "wifi",
    "bluetooth",
    "ethernet",
    "can"
  ],
  "debug": {
    "openocd_board": "esp-wroom-32.cfg"
  },
  "frameworks": [
    "arduino",
    "espidf"
  ],
  "name": "#FujiNet WROOM",
  "upload": {
    "flash_size": "4MB",
    "maximum_ram_size": 327680,
    "maximum_size": 4194304,
    "protocols": [
      "esptool",
      "espota",
      "ftdi"
    ],
    "require_upload_port": true,
    "speed": 460800
  },
  "url": "https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/atariwifi",
  "vendor": "FujiNet Project"
}

I can see that defined for other boards:

$ grep BOARD_HAS_PSRAM * -R
boards/fujinet-v1.json:    "extra_flags": "-DARDUINO_ESP32_DEV -DBOARD_HAS_PSRAM",
boards/fujinet-v1-4mb.json:    "extra_flags": "-DARDUINO_ESP32_DEV -DBOARD_HAS_PSRAM",

Is my board definition ok? I do not mention BOARD_HAS_PSRAM in flags, or it's defined somewhere else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr Robot said:

It has a micro SD slot on it like the SDrive-Max does, you can literally pull the card out of your SDrive, put it in your Fujinet, add the "SD" device to the Fujinet host list and carry on just like you did on the SDrive (but better with long filename support etc.)

 

No it doesn't work like SIO2PC at all. You can set up a bit of software on your PC called TNFSD which you point to a directory on your computer, while TNFSD is running you can point your Fujinet at it and browse that directory on your Atari just like you would browse the SD card on your SDrive. If you want to add something new, just put it in the shared directory and it instantly becomes visible on your atari.


There is nothing to stop you making the TNFSD service publicly available if you want (you might want to make it read only if you do that) and there are a few people who have done this. You can connect your Fujinet to their TNFS service and you can browse those directories just like you can browse your SD card.

 

I usually create save disks on my SD card and load my software from my read only TNFS server at Fujinet.Atari8bit.net. You can see server stats for it at https://atari8bit.net/fujinet/ it might help you visualise what is going on.

 

*All this is optional, you can just use your SD card if you prefer. There is noting stopping you from just using it as an SDrive replacement with built in wifi-modem and printer emulation if you like. All the extra functionality is there for when you find you need it.

 

Yes it does, there is a known issue for people who own a 1088XEL which is fixed in the next hardware revision, if you don't have a 1088XEL you don't need to worry about that.

 

 

EDIT: I made this a while ago, sorry for the slow pacing.

 

So, when using just sd card, do you read from the Atari monitor like a multicart or how do you browse without the lcd screen on the sdrive max?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Swami said:

So, when using just sd card, do you read from the Atari monitor like a multicart or how do you browse without the lcd screen on the sdrive max?

Just like when you boot to D0 on your SDrive and browse using the Atari SDrive menu, the Fujinet boots to a config program that runs on your Atari and allows you to browse the software from there. Watch the video ;) I know it's slow, sorry!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, myriadcs said:

My board definition looks like:


$ cat boards/fujinet-wroom.json 
{
  "build": {
    "arduino":{
      "ldscript": "esp32_out.ld"
    },
    "core": "esp32",
    "extra_flags": "-DARDUINO_ESP32_DEV",
    "f_cpu": "240000000L",
    "f_flash": "40000000L",
    "flash_mode": "dio",
    "mcu": "esp32",
    "variant": "esp32",
    "partitions": "fujinet_partitions_4MB.csv"
  },
  "connectivity": [
    "wifi",
    "bluetooth",
    "ethernet",
    "can"
  ],
  "debug": {
    "openocd_board": "esp-wroom-32.cfg"
  },
  "frameworks": [
    "arduino",
    "espidf"
  ],
  "name": "#FujiNet WROOM",
  "upload": {
    "flash_size": "4MB",
    "maximum_ram_size": 327680,
    "maximum_size": 4194304,
    "protocols": [
      "esptool",
      "espota",
      "ftdi"
    ],
    "require_upload_port": true,
    "speed": 460800
  },
  "url": "https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/atariwifi",
  "vendor": "FujiNet Project"
}

I can see that defined for other boards:


$ grep BOARD_HAS_PSRAM * -R
boards/fujinet-v1.json:    "extra_flags": "-DARDUINO_ESP32_DEV -DBOARD_HAS_PSRAM",
boards/fujinet-v1-4mb.json:    "extra_flags": "-DARDUINO_ESP32_DEV -DBOARD_HAS_PSRAM",

Is my board definition ok? I do not mention BOARD_HAS_PSRAM in flags, or it's defined somewhere else?

The BOARD_HAS_PSRAM precompiler flag is used in several places in the source code.  Since WROOM doesn't have PSRAM, it should not be defined, so it looks correct. The boards/fujinet-wroom.json file is correct in the v0.1.ccbb292f release, so you shouldn't have to do anything other than specify the correct ENV value in your PLATFORMIO.INI.  This is well commented in the PLATFORMIO.INI file.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jamm said:

The BOARD_HAS_PSRAM precompiler flag is used in several places in the source code.  Since WROOM doesn't have PSRAM, it should not be defined, so it looks correct. The boards/fujinet-wroom.json file is correct in the v0.1.ccbb292f release, so you shouldn't have to do anything other than specify the correct ENV value in your PLATFORMIO.INI.  This is well commented in the PLATFORMIO.INI file.

my platformio.ini looks ok I think

$ cat platformio.ini 
;FujiNet PlatformIO Project Configuration File
;
;   Build options: build flags, source filter
;   Upload options: custom upload port, speed and extra flags
;   Library options: dependencies, extra library storages
;   Advanced options: extra scripting
;
; Please visit documentation for the other options and examples
; https://docs.platformio.org/page/projectconf.html

[platformio]
description = FujiNet Atari to ESP32 WiFi Multifunction Firmware
; Change this to target the device you use from the list of [env:xxx] sections below
default_envs = fujinet-wroom

[env]
; Common settings for all enivornments
platform = espressif32
framework = espidf
extra_scripts = pre:build_version.py
lib_ldf_mode = deep+
;upload_port = COM1 ; Windows
upload_port = /dev/ttyUSB0 ; Linux
upload_speed = 921600
;monitor_port = COM1 ; Windows
monitor_port = /dev/ttyUSB0 ; Linux
monitor_speed = 921600
monitor_filters = time

; ESP32 WROOM 
[env:fujinet-wroom]
board = fujinet-wroom
build_type = debug
build_flags =
    ;-D JTAG
    -D DEBUG_SPEED=921600
    -D BLUETOOTH_SUPPORT
    ;-D FN_HISPEED_INDEX=0
    ;-D VERBOSE_SIO
    ;-D VERBOSE_TNFS
    ;-D VERBOSE_DISK
    ;-D VERBOSE_ATX

Only thing I can think of is boot_app0.bin which was not produced in build and I had to take it from current one. Maybe it has references to PSRAM? what that binary is responsible for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, myriadcs said:

my platformio.ini looks ok I think


$ cat platformio.ini 
;FujiNet PlatformIO Project Configuration File
;
;   Build options: build flags, source filter
;   Upload options: custom upload port, speed and extra flags
;   Library options: dependencies, extra library storages
;   Advanced options: extra scripting
;
; Please visit documentation for the other options and examples
; https://docs.platformio.org/page/projectconf.html

[platformio]
description = FujiNet Atari to ESP32 WiFi Multifunction Firmware
; Change this to target the device you use from the list of [env:xxx] sections below
default_envs = fujinet-wroom

[env]
; Common settings for all enivornments
platform = espressif32
framework = espidf
extra_scripts = pre:build_version.py
lib_ldf_mode = deep+
;upload_port = COM1 ; Windows
upload_port = /dev/ttyUSB0 ; Linux
upload_speed = 921600
;monitor_port = COM1 ; Windows
monitor_port = /dev/ttyUSB0 ; Linux
monitor_speed = 921600
monitor_filters = time

; ESP32 WROOM 
[env:fujinet-wroom]
board = fujinet-wroom
build_type = debug
build_flags =
    ;-D JTAG
    -D DEBUG_SPEED=921600
    -D BLUETOOTH_SUPPORT
    ;-D FN_HISPEED_INDEX=0
    ;-D VERBOSE_SIO
    ;-D VERBOSE_TNFS
    ;-D VERBOSE_DISK
    ;-D VERBOSE_ATX

Only thing I can think of is boot_app0.bin which was not produced in build and I had to take it from current one. Maybe it has references to PSRAM? what that binary is responsible for?

If any part of the firmware isn't building, then obviously there's something fundamentally wrong with the setup.  I recommend deleting the project directory entirely and starting with a fresh download of the v0.1.ccbb292f release.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, jamm said:

If any part of the firmware isn't building, then obviously there's something fundamentally wrong with the setup.  I recommend deleting the project directory entirely and starting with a fresh download of the v0.1.ccbb292f release.

 

I have removed directory completely, downloaded zip https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/fujinet-platformio/archive/v0.1.ccbb292f.zip unpacked, added platformio.ini as in earlier post and run build.

No errors

=========================================================================== [SUCCESS] Took 273.02 seconds ===========================================================================

Environment    Status    Duration
-------------  --------  ------------
fujinet-wroom  SUCCESS   00:04:33.019

but boot_app0.bin is not there

$ find . -name "*.bin"
./.pio/build/fujinet-wroom/partitions.bin
./.pio/build/fujinet-wroom/CMakeFiles/3.16.4/CMakeDetermineCompilerABI_CXX.bin
./.pio/build/fujinet-wroom/CMakeFiles/3.16.4/CMakeDetermineCompilerABI_C.bin
./.pio/build/fujinet-wroom/bootloader.bin
./.pio/build/fujinet-wroom/firmware.bin
./.pio/build/fujinet-wroom/bootloader/CMakeFiles/3.16.4/CMakeDetermineCompilerABI_CXX.bin
./.pio/build/fujinet-wroom/bootloader/CMakeFiles/3.16.4/CMakeDetermineCompilerABI_C.bin
./data/850handler.bin
./data/picoboot.bin
./data/850relocator.bin

but also no spiffs.bin this time so I guess something must be missing in my setup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...