Jump to content
IGNORED

HOKEY demo


batari

Recommended Posts

On 7/29/2021 at 8:31 PM, batari said:

Yes, 48k/POKEY support is 100% in firmware, and in my spare time (ha!) I am working on a major firmware update to address this and other issues. The major firmware update will be out before HOKEY as it has other improvements to Concerto's POKEY support code.

 

But, I can probably do an interim release that just fixes the 48k+POKEY issue, and I probably should so I can test Danger Zone.

 

HOKEY will be available for developers as soon as I get the in-circuit, user-programmability working so that people can update firmware and install new sound drivers as they are developed. Right now the only way to reprogram a HOKEY is via proprietary tools. It will probably take me a few weeks to get this sorted out.

 

HOKEY does not yet support EXO as I have not yet figured out how the weird two-tone modes work, but the documentation is there and schematics exist so I expect it's just a matter of time. I do intend to make HOKEY work with all of the weird POKEY modes. Depending on when you release EXO, I may or may not have things figured out by then.

 

 

 

Fred, Thanks for the update on HOKEY, really excellent news ! :) 

 

Danger Zone is complete and ready to go to store (imminently) and I don't expect issues with HOKEY as I think the music that we used doesn't use any exotic modes or anything.

 

The plan is to bring EXO to the store Q1 2022. I think the RC binary we have right now is basically "done", so we do have a little time to tinker with the music if needs be. 

 

I think I mentioned before that I am happy to test HOKEY with EXO, or even better @Synthpopalooza, as his ear for the tunes that he created is many orders of magnitude better than mine :) (I'd happily pay for a HOKEY or two for development purposes and have one sent to Bobby). I do think that this test for EXO needs to happen at some point if HOKEY's are going to be in the EXO carts, which I think is the plan, and if there are issues, then we have some time to work around them.

 

Let me know if you want to pick up on PMs. ?

 

 

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is excellent news!  I love the flexibility and expandability that is being offered. The future of 7800 homebrew will continue to shine bright. 

 

I don't remember if I mentioned it in my PM to you, but Donkey Kong Remix is currently using two tone mode for some of the sounds.  I hope that feature is something that you will be able to implement when you have time.  ?

 

Thanks for this amazing work!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, freetz said:

This is awesome news, but what I don't understand so far is why a version for the 8-Bit Atari would be different from the Basic version? I thought the POKEYs used in e.g. Ballblazer were the same as the ones built into the 800 XL for example?

The Basic version is intended for 7800 homebrews which generally only require sound capabilities and maybe the random number generator, so these versions can use less costly hardware.

 

The 8-bits use all features of the POKEY chip such as the pot ports, serial I/O, keyboard scan and other features and implementing all of this requires more costly hardware.

 

I always felt it was important to be very mindful of cost when designing HOKEY as the main target is the 7800 homebrew market.

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, batari said:

The Basic version is intended for 7800 homebrews which generally only require sound capabilities and maybe the random number generator, so these versions can use less costly hardware.

 

The 8-bits use all features of the POKEY chip such as the pot ports, serial I/O, keyboard scan and other features and implementing all of this requires more costly hardware.

 

I always felt it was important to be very mindful of cost when designing HOKEY as the main target is the 7800 homebrew market.

Thank you for the explanation, that of course makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kitrinx said:

It's hard to see, but that just looks like a microcontroller plugged into a carrier board. Is this going to go the same route as that 2600 stuff that is just a grossly overpowered arm cpu running software emulators of hardware parts?

Absolutely not.  This is a reproduction of the PoKey chip in various forms.  Unless you can start up your own NMOS IC production plant which probably hasn't made the chips since 1980, it needs recreated.

 

Please go back and do some research.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...