Frozone212 Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 Has anyone heard of the CBM-5x0? What computer is it. It reads Commodore 128 basic v4.0 yet none of the commands work for the 128. curious about this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 Looks like the B128. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozone212 Posted January 7, 2022 Author Share Posted January 7, 2022 thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlsson Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 P128 or P500 to be more exact. It was part of the CBM-II line, released in parallel with the C64. It has both VIC-II and SID, but 6509 and 128K RAM. In the beginning of 1983, Commodore internally called this computer C128, but it soon disappeared from the market. The P128/P500 today is very rare and valuable, in particular in US NTSC version - slightly more often seen in European PAL version. There is also the D128 which is kind of a precursor of the "real" C128, but that one never made it beyond prototype stage. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozone212 Posted January 7, 2022 Author Share Posted January 7, 2022 is there an assembler for this computer or a monitor or anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlsson Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 SYS 4 will throw you into the built-in TIM monitor, just like it does on most PET and CBM-II systems. But don't expect much, it can list memory with the M command and a few more commands. Generally the P500 has very little software archived. I know some people have worked on converting C64 games, for instance there is a version of Atarisoft Pac-Man that was made to run on the P500. However just like the 80 column CBM-II series, it has a convoluted memory map so despite it has 128K RAM, it is scattered in a layout that makes it a PITA to program in machine code. BASIC might actually be preferred as the interpreter handles the memory juggling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.