xabin Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 So, after watching an Ashens video, again, which shows one of them, I had to wonder, what's with the flip-up lid on the Speech Synthesizer Unit? What was it used for, and what could be inserted into it, if anything? It just seems odd that a flap would be built into one of these things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 TI had originally intended for ROM cartridges with additional speech data. This did not pan out. -Thom 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digdugnate Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 The original intent was upgradeable speech with mini-cartridges. Most synths don't have the ports for them. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 We (and by "we" I mean "someone other than me") should add this to the FAQ. It gets asked enough. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixelpedant Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 And even had they ever been mass produced, they would have been rather pointless. Given that external speech patterns (i.e., ones not stored in the speech ROM) could be used, and even in BASIC were supported by CALL SAY via Speech Editor from the get-go. The only benefit would be an ease-of-use benefit to end users without the means to compose their own new patterns. Which was a problem Terminal Emulator II solved by adding text-to-speech. But TI was evidently very sold on "solid state cartridges" being the solution to everything, from their 99/4 promo materials. So it's no surprise they tried to make speech a "solid state cartridge" technology too. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 33 minutes ago, OLD CS1 said: We (and by "we" I mean "someone other than me") should add this to the FAQ. It gets asked enough. It's already in there. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 55 minutes ago, Casey said: It's already in there. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+arcadeshopper Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JB Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 The real purpose of the flap is so you can put a hand on it and make it open and close while it talks. 's what I did as a kid. 2 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 5 hours ago, JB said: The real purpose of the flap is so you can put a hand on it and make it open and close while it talks. 's what I did as a kid. Did it say "butter" or "parkay"? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOME AUTOMATION Posted October 23, 2022 Share Posted October 23, 2022 The future of speech synthesis... 4 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digdugnate Posted October 24, 2022 Share Posted October 24, 2022 The flap is clearly to put your weed in! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atarian7 Posted October 24, 2022 Share Posted October 24, 2022 Police officers enter. "There's no weed in there!" 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matthew180 Posted October 24, 2022 Share Posted October 24, 2022 On 10/21/2022 at 8:11 PM, digdugnate said: Most synths don't have the ports for them. I have never seen (photo, or otherwise) any speech synth that *does* have the ROM port (not the lib, but the actual internal ROM plug). Do we know for a fact that any version of the speech synth was actually made with a ROM port, or was the idea dropped before any speech synth PCBs were produced? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted October 24, 2022 Share Posted October 24, 2022 3 minutes ago, matthew180 said: I have never seen (photo, or otherwise) any speech synth that *does* have the ROM port (not the lib, but the actual internal ROM plug). Someone posted a photo of one in this very forum! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+arcadeshopper Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 53 minutes ago, matthew180 said: I have never seen (photo, or otherwise) any speech synth that *does* have the ROM port (not the lib, but the actual internal ROM plug). Do we know for a fact that any version of the speech synth was actually made with a ROM port, or was the idea dropped before any speech synth PCBs were produced? I posted one.. (digging) 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Ksarul Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 12 hours ago, matthew180 said: I have never seen (photo, or otherwise) any speech synth that *does* have the ROM port (not the lib, but the actual internal ROM plug). Do we know for a fact that any version of the speech synth was actually made with a ROM port, or was the idea dropped before any speech synth PCBs were produced? I received one as a surprise bonus in an auction I won a few years ago, and several folks here on the forum also have one. There are actually two different revisions of Speech Synthesizers with the connector, using different styles of connector cables but otherwise identical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matthew180 Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 Well look at that, it does exist! Now a bunch of questions come to mind: * Do we know a date or serial number range where they removed the connector? * Has anyone taken theirs apart to get some detailed photos? * Are there schematics for this version? * Were any of the plug-in ROM module produced? * Does anyone have a speech ROM module? Wondering about the design to have the socket on the module instead of in the synth (looking at the photo above, it appears to be a PCB edge to receive a module). Extra component and cost for each module. The finance team probably did not like that at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+FarmerPotato Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 Look at the Speak and Spell design. (Just a card edge on the main PCB?) A kid slides in the little orange module, which has only a narrow slot exposed. Think kid-proof. Ditto for all other speech toys (I mean educational product. The Touch and Tell modules are the same idea. Need to open some modules when I get home. The schematic for the speech synthesizer port is simple. Somewhere here in this forum… it’s marked “proposed” though. The VSM (ROM) needs 8 pins. 4 address/data Nybble , CE, I0, I1 and CLK. Oh yeah VSS and VCC. CE is tied active. There are 7 traces to the built-VSMs (piggybacked) which branch off to the external connector. An external VSM would have to have a higher address in its mask. Another mask option was for CE positive or negative (reuse the base addresses in a second set.) (Electronics Goldmine has unknown VSMs, the 6100s or 61002 maybe for the 5220. Speech roulette!) Need to open some modules up when I get home. Should be more photos on Datamath though. You can see some BOM cost reviews in places like the 99/4B and QI scans. If I’m back at SMU , I’ll check for that sort of thing in the speech synthesizer folders. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wierd_w Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 Last I looked at my speech, there is clearly a neat row of tinned over thru-holes where the feature is supposed to go. It's just not populated. an interesting solution could possibly be put there, and on the sideport data connector, that basically houses an addressable SRAM into which speech samples can be loaded, and then handled by the speech unit. Say with CRU writes. This would put it outside the normal RAM area, and allow a lot of use out of the speech without sacrificing system memory to use CALL SAY. There is ample realestate inside the speech enclosure for such a thing. As demonstrated with the TIPI for the speech enclosure, a microSD card could even sit there (in the door), for disk based samples. It's a missed opportunity in the modern upgrade realm, imo. The speech really could be abused in some clever ways as an additional sound source. LPC can do much more than voice. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apersson850 Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 I envision the game MASH 4077: "I can hear incoming chopters!" flaff-flaff-flaff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 3 hours ago, apersson850 said: I envision the game MASH 4077: "I can hear incoming chopters!" flaff-flaff-flaff 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+FarmerPotato Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 On 10/25/2022 at 9:46 AM, matthew180 said: Well look at that, it does exist! Now a bunch of questions come to mind: * Do we know a date or serial number range where they removed the connector? * Has anyone taken theirs apart to get some detailed photos? * Are there schematics for this version? * Were any of the plug-in ROM module produced? * Does anyone have a speech ROM module? Wondering about the design to have the socket on the module instead of in the synth (looking at the photo above, it appears to be a PCB edge to receive a module). Extra component and cost for each module. The finance team probably did not like that at all. Here's the Speech Synth schematic from the C.B. Wilson papers. (The one I saw in the TI archives, SMU, is not this complete. But the expansion connector is the same.) speech_synth_1980.pdf 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dphirschler Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 (edited) I am thinking, instead of speech, additional sound capability would maybe be possible. Different wavforms (triangle, sawtooth, etc) or maybe more channels? Edited November 12, 2022 by dphirschler 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.