42bs Posted November 6, 2022 Share Posted November 6, 2022 https://github.com/42Bastian/new_bll/tree/master/demos/depacker upkr: https://github.com/exoticorn/upkr 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+karri Posted November 6, 2022 Share Posted November 6, 2022 Really good compression rate. But slow to depack. For my eyes the exomizer looks best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted November 6, 2022 Author Share Posted November 6, 2022 Yes, the main problem is the multiplication to get the next bit. But even on Jaguar with single cycle multiplication it is very slow. This and the large depack routine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted November 6, 2022 Author Share Posted November 6, 2022 17 minutes ago, karri said: Really good compression rate. But slow to depack. For my eyes the exomizer looks best. I need to test also depacking from ROM. But I guess LZ4 will outperform every other packer unless the pack ratio is the goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted November 7, 2022 Share Posted November 7, 2022 (edited) 16 hours ago, karri said: Really good compression rate. But slow to depack. For my eyes the exomizer looks best. That is why I used it in Bad Apple for video packing . That and because I could used stream depacking. Edited November 7, 2022 by sage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted November 7, 2022 Author Share Posted November 7, 2022 (edited) My problem with exomizer, the "Level" compression seems to be size limited. I wanted to pack the Jaguar image (128,000 bytes) and it just does nothing. And the "raw" compressed format seems to be different from the "level" format. (Besides: I could not find any documentation explaining the differences between raw and level). Edited November 7, 2022 by 42bs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted November 8, 2022 Author Share Posted November 8, 2022 On 11/7/2022 at 12:45 PM, sage said: That is why I used it in Bad Apple for video packing . That and because I could used stream depacking. On 11/6/2022 at 8:43 PM, karri said: Really good compression rate. But slow to depack. For my eyes the exomizer looks best. Added a `Exomizer RAW` mode unpacker. No special handling of input data (adding additional bytes) needed. Slightly quicker than "krilldecr" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.