Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Supermario kart seems to be not the first battle racing game were you have to grab item to use them to your advantage,atari’s roadblasters does that as well BUT too bad it’s only single player and you don’t race multiple laps to reach the finish,

sega’s power drift kart game does require driving multiple labs to reach the finish but you can choose between different racers but again it’s sadly for 1 player only

Supermario kart combines both elements and redefines it and you can also play with 2 players,HOWEVER my only criticism about supermario kart is that the playfield is NOT in full screen,WHY nintendo???

sure for 2 players i can understand that such split screen is necessary but for 1 player???

2F7A78E3-F7D6-4CCD-A511-E255C796B13A.jpeg

87401AE5-8045-4523-9A24-8C2DD2560A9C.jpeg

Edited by johannesmutlu

Why do you exist, is it to torment us, because you seem to have some anti-nintendo slant to push on of all places an atari site, it just doesn't make any sense now does it??? Who cares if Supermario kart was first or not other than you, and i think that is about it, just you that seems to care, and why??? The game isn't full screen because they went with the map or rear video shot to show closely following racers, and thats not a problem, it was a design choice really given it can do 2 players.

  • Sad 1
1 hour ago, Tanooki said:

Why do you exist, is it to torment us, because you seem to have some anti-nintendo slant to push on of all places an atari site, it just doesn't make any sense now does it??? Who cares if Supermario kart was first or not other than you, and i think that is about it, just you that seems to care, and why??? The game isn't full screen because they went with the map or rear video shot to show closely following racers, and thats not a problem, it was a design choice really given it can do 2 players.

 

Here, I'll just go ahead and crank out the reply in advance

 

 

Hohoho hahaha,,,,, very droll 👎🙁

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2

Could it be that Nintendo of Netherland just went a little overboard with their products, and J-Mu is just now discovering the truths behind the false propaganda?? I had a hunch and went through my collection and sure enough, I have had this copy all along but never paid attention to it:

droll-super-mario-kart-snes-front-cover.thumb.jpg.b357513c97d1e5ccf8ffd7eabf7bd1e2.jpg

droll-super-mario-kart-snes-back-cover.thumb.jpg.2dc759f0c0be5a525dd859ca42a0ea58.jpg

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 3
7 hours ago, Tanooki said:

Why do you exist, is it to torment us, because you seem to have some anti-nintendo slant to push on of all places an atari site, it just doesn't make any sense now does it??? Who cares if Supermario kart was first or not other than you, and i think that is about it, just you that seems to care, and why??? The game isn't full screen because they went with the map or rear video shot to show closely following racers, and thats not a problem, it was a design choice really given it can do 2 players.

Why do you exist,whether i do sounding anto nintendo or not on this atari site,i am certainly not anti atari on this site,becides i first tout that this site was only about atari,so theres nothing wrong with that? I only want to point out that nintendo was not so original as i first did always tout,am mean why i didn’t heard about road blasters or power drift back then? Why is it that because of the invention of the digital road called the internet that we/i do get sooo much more information to our disposal,

don’t you think that i hope that everytime i make a point about certain things about nintendo,that it is the last one? Yes i do so,

it’s everybody’s right,

damn i swear to those gods that if somebody did made all those posts about those pseudo anti nintendo stuff,i simply would,ve blowed my mind because off all the unique information it contains,

it’s just so sad that these days everything before nintendo is slowly fading into obscurity and that’s sooo bad because they form an important part of the history,

now whatever everybody cares or just don’t care at who came first or not,i don’t care anymore ever since,i got my statements and that’s it,

becides i still do love nintendo and you got to know that if nintendo (but also sega) games didn’t appear on atari systems,then i probably never would,ve became a atari fan,something i didn’t knew for over 2 decades and that’s it,

so fifa to both atari,nintendo and sega for those great stuff from the past.

601B00A5-5AD0-495D-95B9-D7CC36B6F4F2.jpeg

6 hours ago, Cebus Capucinis said:

 

Here, I'll just go ahead and crank out the reply in advance

 

 

Hohoho hahaha,,,,, very droll 👎🙁

Yep you got it right paw, all i can say about all those critics abbout my statements is,

hohoho hahaha how droll,,, very droll👎🥲🥲🤣

54 minutes ago, Lost Monkey said:

Nintendo never touted Mario Kart as the first battle racing game. 

Well it’s some sort of battle kart race game (i wanted to rectifie the title of it but sadly i ran out of time),i don’t know how nintendo would state it exactly.

2 hours ago, Lost Monkey said:

Nintendo never touted Mario Kart as the first battle racing game. 

Next thing you'll be telling me The Crash™️ never happened.

  • Haha 2
14 hours ago, johannesmutlu said:

don’t you think that i hope that everytime i make a point about certain things about nintendo,that it is the last one? Yes i do so,

 

What points are you making, though?  That's what's so confusing to many of us here.   You don't really seem to have a point other than a lot of "other games existed before Nintendo" ramblings.   Well, yeah... we knew that already.

 

Don't get me wrong, it that's what you enjoy, go for it.  No harm done, in my opinion.  But if you truly believe that everytime "it is the last one," that seems to be something that's very much within your control.  Just stop and move on to something else.  Make some posts picking on Sega, Sony, MS, etc.   Or make a post about how your posts seems to not be the first posts crapping on Nintendo.  

 

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, Razzie.P said:

What points are you making, though?  That's what's so confusing to many of us here.   You don't really seem to have a point other than a lot of "other games existed before Nintendo" ramblings.   Well, yeah... we knew that already.

 

Don't get me wrong, it that's what you enjoy, go for it.  No harm done, in my opinion.  But if you truly believe that everytime "it is the last one," that seems to be something that's very much within your control.  Just stop and move on to something else.  Make some posts picking on Sega, Sony, MS, etc.   Or make a post about how your posts seems to not be the first posts crapping on Nintendo.  

 

Well i did make atleast 1 crappy statement about sony a whileago,

HOWEVER for a looooong time i always tout that nintendo was the first and most innovative company and that all other company’s were always copy cat pasting nintendo’s ideas into their own games or consoles,whether sega,sony or those chinese or south korean companies etc,,,

But now we got older and do get all the information from the internet these days,and with a bit of research we can rewind the tape a little bit more back and discover things wich was otherwise hidden by the modern media these days,


for instance why do most people do know about the gameboy and also tout it to be be the first cartride based handheld? i always did trough the same thing,

not knowing that the microvision and the game pocket computer predated the gameboy years before,

why do most people know about supermariobros and trough that to be the first side scrolling platform game ever,like i always did too?,not knowing that pac land predates it by 1 year,

why do most people do know about the game & watch and believe it to be the first single lcd screen handheld game? ,not knowing that the mattel computer gim handheld predates it by a few month’s or 1 year etc,,,

that’s why i make those posts to remind people otherwise,

yes i know those factors behind it ,supermariobros was a succes,pac land not so,game & watch a success and the computer gim not so,

the gameboy was a success and both the microvision and the game pocket computer not so,but still,those systems and games shouldn’t fade into obscurity and they do form an important part of the video game history as well,

but sadly those magazines from whether game company wants you believe otherwise,they always outbests their selfes while crapping on other game company’s,

 

for instance i readed in a nintendo game magazine that the nes was the first game console to be connected to a tv,wich is an absolute lie because we all know that the magnovox offysey was the first (non programmible) cartride based console to be connected to a tv,followed by atari,mattel,coleco among many others before the nes,so what on earth were they talking about in that nintendo magazine back then,heck even nintendo had already game consoles before the nes albeit pong clone consoles in most cases,also i was aware about atari at the time so i just hardly could believe such bullchaim,

the correct statement in that magazine should,ve be

’the nes is Nintendo’s first cartride based home console to be connected to a tv’ because that would,ve be indead correct in such case,

in short i feel so bad that we do get fooled by the media including the general media,and so since then i will take everything with a grain of salt.

 

 

9 hours ago, johannesmutlu said:

Well i did make atleast 1 crappy statement about sony a whileago,

HOWEVER for a looooong time i always tout that nintendo was the first and most innovative company and that all other company’s were always copy cat pasting nintendo’s ideas into their own games or consoles,whether sega,sony or those chinese or south korean companies etc,,,

But now we got older and do get all the information from the internet these days,and with a bit of research we can rewind the tape a little bit more back and discover things wich was otherwise hidden by the modern media these days,


for instance why do most people do know about the gameboy and also tout it to be be the first cartride based handheld? i always did trough the same thing,

not knowing that the microvision and the game pocket computer predated the gameboy years before,

why do most people know about supermariobros and trough that to be the first side scrolling platform game ever,like i always did too?,not knowing that pac land predates it by 1 year,

why do most people do know about the game & watch and believe it to be the first single lcd screen handheld game? ,not knowing that the mattel computer gim handheld predates it by a few month’s or 1 year etc,,,

that’s why i make those posts to remind people otherwise,

yes i know those factors behind it ,supermariobros was a succes,pac land not so,game & watch a success and the computer gim not so,

the gameboy was a success and both the microvision and the game pocket computer not so,but still,those systems and games shouldn’t fade into obscurity and they do form an important part of the video game history as well,

but sadly those magazines from whether game company wants you believe otherwise,they always outbests their selfes while crapping on other game company’s,

 

for instance i readed in a nintendo game magazine that the nes was the first game console to be connected to a tv,wich is an absolute lie because we all know that the magnovox offysey was the first (non programmible) cartride based console to be connected to a tv,followed by atari,mattel,coleco among many others before the nes,so what on earth were they talking about in that nintendo magazine back then,heck even nintendo had already game consoles before the nes albeit pong clone consoles in most cases,also i was aware about atari at the time so i just hardly could believe such bullchaim,

the correct statement in that magazine should,ve be

’the nes is Nintendo’s first cartride based home console to be connected to a tv’ because that would,ve be indead correct in such case,

in short i feel so bad that we do get fooled by the media including the general media,and so since then i will take everything with a grain of salt.

 

 

Oh, so you just want to set the record straight on everything you tout you knew but were mistaken?  One - thing - at - a - time?

 

Not to add fuel to the fire - but have you looked into the analog controller on the N64?   I bet there is a thread there! 

 

Also - Pizza Hut?

 

 

1 hour ago, Lost Monkey said:

Oh, so you just want to set the record straight on everything you tout you knew but were mistaken?  One - thing - at - a - time?

 

Not to add fuel to the fire - but have you looked into the analog controller on the N64?   I bet there is a thread there! 

 

Also - Pizza Hut?

 

 

Yep,i remember about the review of the atari 5200 by the AVGN back in 2007??? And once i heard him talking about the analogue stick of that controller and the fact that those early 5200 models also did had 4 controller ports on the front,i was like ‘wooow i didn’t knew that,i tout that the N64 was the first console with 4 controller ports on the front along with an analogue stick’

so as you can imagine i was really impressed about that,

altrough i think the N64 was the first console with an expandible controller in wich you could plug in different modules such as the ramble or save module etc,,,,and i believe nintendo also invented the rumble feature in general,right? Trough the later on appearing second gen ps1 controllers did had rumble feature builtin,

and lastly nintendo invented the 3 handgrip controller for the N64,unless somebody could prove my that the N64 controller was not so innovative as i did first tout,but i think it was,

now about that 5200 controller,it was the first controller with a start,pause and reset button on it in wich i didn’t knew about it,it almost did set the standard for future console with the only difference that on those future consoles the reset button is on the console itself wich is more nevessary off course,

eventrough i found it admittedly stupid that atari had decided to switch back to it’s old concept with their 7800 with both pause and start aside from the reset button on the console itself,

oh well it is what it is,but if i should picture it i should picture it like this,

 

3F0E217F-4FF7-48CE-B9ED-F1CCDDBB343B.jpeg

2 hours ago, Wayler said:

Hey @Lord Mushroom! That is how you get a like from the J-Man. Eat it! 

Yep just eat it,and i would also suggest to him to eat this delicious looking emojo🤣

hahaaaa🤣🤣

  • Sad 2
3 hours ago, TheGameCollector said:

Here's an idea. Why not make a Super Mario Kart fullscreen rom hack?

 

Oh wait, that already exists!

 

smkfullsceen.png

WoooW seriously?

if a full screen version does exist that would be definitely awesome and it will make the game also look waaay more appealing and presentible,if only they will also put in a backwards feature sothat in case i will run into a dead end zone,that i don’t have to turn all the way my car around ,

by the way i had this idea 15 years ago by demonstrating the idea of a full screen version of mario kart by zoom in on the playfield once i recorded the gameplay of it on a dvd(yeah my dvd recorder could only zoon in on recorded sessions,it cannot zoom in on live recordings sadly)

these day’s you can use a frame meister to live zoom in on playing sessions of whether game you want,i demonstrated that as well on youtube,BUT it does have it’s disadvantage, it introduces a huge input lag,

seriously if i full screen version of matio kart does exist,i will go all loud about this😁

Whoa steady there, aren't you forgetting something?

 

Did you check if that rom hack was the first rom hack ever made? I doubt it. Similarly, I think there have been other fullscreen racing games with lap times before. These important things need to be investigated before you are allowed to be excited.

  • Thanks 1
14 hours ago, Wayler said:

Whoa steady there, aren't you forgetting something?

 

Did you check if that rom hack was the first rom hack ever made? I doubt it. Similarly, I think there have been other fullscreen racing games with lap times before. These important things need to be investigated before you are allowed to be excited.

Wow,,,what a great idea paw,,,,hohoho hahaha very droll 👎🙁

  • Sad 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...