Jump to content
IGNORED

How identical are the new joysticks for the 2600+ to the original? (i mean down to the millimeter accurate)


Recommended Posts

I make a coupler that works for the CX40 joysticks specifically and I just wonder if the coupler would work with 2600+ joysticks.  Not sure if anyone who owns one happens to also own any of the couplers I make for the 2600

 

These are made VERY close to the exact size of a CX40 so even 1-2mm difference in any direction hight, width or depth could result in a poor fit.  I did ask this question awhile ago, but never got a direct answer so I thought I'd give it a fresh try rather than try to bump the original question. 

image.thumb.jpeg.6cf3d5d1bf5e37772ad197a367b15c4d.jpeg

 

Thanks,
Caleb

  • Like 3

I was hoping yours will be one of those posts that answer the question with digital calipers and lots of numbers! 
 

You might have to send a sample of your device to so,some at Atari or another volunteer, or have them send you one of the new sticks for testing. 
 

Why the need for such precision? Are they 3D printed?

  • Like 1
25 minutes ago, Ben from Plaion said:

I'll measure them with calipers on Monday. 

thank you!  yea i can compare even measurements to know if they are close enough.  There is some room for variance, but not a lot.  it's fine line between too tight and too loose. 

  • Like 1
32 minutes ago, Flojomojo said:

You might have to send a sample of your device to so, some at Atari or another volunteer

yea or i'll pick up a 2600+ myself and test against it.. then return it..  but i'm not a big fan of doing that so that's a last resort.  

 

33 minutes ago, Flojomojo said:

Why the need for such precision? Are they 3D printed?

Yes I design and make these for folks.   https://www.ebay.com/itm/115705572856 

 

 

  • Like 2
2 minutes ago, Dr Karnov said:

If they fit the new joysticks,

I'll definitely let you know as soon as I know myself.  I think best buy might carry them.  if they do i'll pick one up later this week unless i can get those measurements from @Ben from Plaion which i'm sure I will.  As I was saying I'm not a big fan of buying something and returning it.  

If it doesn't fit, what I have done in the past for others like the 5200, 7800 and Gamestation Pro (systems I didn't own to test against myself) is someone mails me their controllers and I make the new coupler for them for free (they cover shipping) and i ship back the new coupler with their controllers.  

  • Like 1
7 minutes ago, 8bitwidgets.com said:

yea or i'll pick up a 2600+ myself and test against it.. then return it..  but i'm not a big fan of doing that so that's a last resort.  

 

Please do not do this. All that happens to your unit, is that the manufacturer makes a complete loss on the production of the machine and the product will probably end up in landfill

  • Like 4
Just now, Ben from Plaion said:

All that happens to your unit, is that the manufacturer makes a complete loss on the production of the machine and the product will probably end up in landfill

that's exactly why i'm reluctant to do it.  i seriously doubt it would come to that especially since you're being awesome to get those measurements.  I'm not going to rush into it.  Even if it takes longer to get a verification..  and just to save time, here are the measurements of my CX40s..   

 

89mm wide

97mm deep 

36mm high

 

These were the widest points of each dimension.  If the 2600+ are within 1-2mm of this they should be ok.  I have a list of early 2600 coupler owners who are on atari age.. i'll also go through that list of guys and see if any of them bought a 2600+

 

 

Maybe I could pay someone to ship a set to me to test and I could return them on my dime.  I'd just like to not spend $130 to test the real thing.  I game on a CRT so the HDMI perk (which is great for many people) and I own a 7800 so just a lot of money for something i don't need.   Anyone in the greater Boston area?!  =D 
 

 

 

48 minutes ago, D Train said:

@sramirez2008 can you help here?

Just compared my CX10s/CX40s to the CX40+ and there is a slight difference. The original controllers do not move at all when used with the coupler, but the CX40+ has a bit of movement (up/down) within the coupler. Appears to be a slight difference in the height of the CX40+. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
15 hours ago, 8bitwidgets.com said:

yea or i'll pick up a 2600+ myself and test against it.. then return it..  but i'm not a big fan of doing that so that's a last resort.  

 

Yes I design and make these for folks.   https://www.ebay.com/itm/115705572856 

 

 

Well, you can also buy just the standalone CX40+ joystick.

  • Like 1
12 hours ago, sramirez2008 said:

Appears to be a slight difference in the height of the CX40+. 

interesting.  so to be clear it's a snug fit left right forward backwards, but vertically there is some play.  

 

question then..  is it still effective? or because of this is it prone to slide out?    do you have the model 2 or model 3?   the latest version I make has a lip on the back which locks in the controller, where my earlier model 1 and 2 were held in strictly by friction.  


I would imagine that it's possible with the model 3 that the vertical give might not matter so much

 

I think I'm going to go ahead and buy a 2600+ and a hyperkin so I can test them all.  I may need to make a few variations.  To confidently account for each shape.  This new version while better for CX40, has me wondering if the hyperkin (which would work if you put it in backwards, will work with this because of the lip and not sure how deep the hyperkin is.  

image.thumb.png.3d8d6dd668dd7eae7d86ec0445c98ab9.png

 

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, 8bitwidgets.com said:

interesting.  so to be clear it's a snug fit left right forward backwards, but vertically there is some play.

The overall fit is a tad looser. It’s easier to slide them in, so overall there is a difference, but the biggest difference is vertically. I have the ones without the tab. The tab should help. I like mine to really lock in, but for others, especially with the tab, it may not be an issue.

 

Note: I hadn’t tested the coupler with the CX40+ controllers because I have mine put away with two CX10s. I primarily use it when my sons come over to play the 2600 homebrew Robotwar 2684. I connect them and my Edladdin Twin-Stick (via the QuadTari) so we can play the two player version of the game. 

IMG_3380.jpeg

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, 8bitwidgets.com said:

ah ok good to know!  i'll keep looking and be sure it's authentic.  

Another way to tell the difference is if they show the plug, like that listing did. The real CX-40+ has the Atari Fuji logo on the plug. If you don't see that, then it's not an authentic Atari controller.

  • Like 3
2 hours ago, 8bitwidgets.com said:

ah ok good to know!  i'll keep looking and be sure it's authentic.  

There’s a comparison between the CX10/CX40s and CX40+ in this video ~14:25 mark.

 

  • Like 2

OK so at this time I'm going to officially say the CX40 coupler is just that..  couplers made for the CX40..  up till now I've not had access to CX10 controllers or the others, but I will go ahead and invest in one of each of them so I can with certainty know what does/doesn't fit well (or well enough) to be useable.  I may need to make some variations for folks like Trooper owners and such.


Up till now it's not been enough demand for anything other than CX40 to make it worth it, but the troopers are still popular and there's a user base of those so they deserve to be represented and of course the 2600+ is the latest addition to the 2600 family, so a lot of energy and excitement is going on about it.  

I made one for the GameStation Pro that I really like as it also allows rotation insertion to do things like play NES games like Smash TV and rotate the physical controllers.. 

image.thumb.png.7ca7592eaea38e853bed9a9084968b1a.png

  • Like 2

I'm curious to see how they hold up when compared to the old ones. Someone younger than me with less arthritis needs to put one through a few plays of Activision's Decathlon. If you have small children or grandchildren toss them a few bucks to run the 1500M and see what's left afterwards!

  • Haha 4
3 hours ago, Ben from Plaion said:

88mm wide

96mm deep 

34mm high

ok compared to 

 

89mm wide

97mm deep 

36mm high

 

So yea just a hair smaller and probably would work fine with the Model 3 Couplers, but I think once I get a CX40+ and a Trooper, I'll produce specific ones for each to insure maximum snugness and reliability.  Making something universal is nice, but usually (like the Intellivision Coupler with the Flashback) trying to make one for all just makes it less optimal for any of them.  However, for someone who wants to be frugal the reality is that putting a few pieces of foam in some key spots would likely give a suitable snugness when needed and when someone wants to use it with the originals they could just remove the foam or heck if you do it optimally, might be able to keep the foam in there for either.  Just never try to force it in.  Should insert and remove comfortably.  

 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...