JasonACT Posted Tuesday at 11:12 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 11:12 AM On 10/23/2024 at 12:33 AM, visrealm said: Pretty interesting results - especially with #2. It looks like the RP2350 is quicker even running identical machine code. These tests don't really compare what the compiler can do with an RP2350 vs the RP2040, since this is mostly GPU-bound which is written in assembly. The render speed tests will measure that (coming soon). I have a strange feeling.. the speed difference is due to interrupt processing (taking less time in the generated C code, therefore giving more cycles to the GPU). A test for later maybe, I'm fighting the GCC RP2040 generated code (which basically ignores most code changes I make to improve speed, even though I can see where it's wasted time). Moving code around does nothing, GCC decides where everything should sit, locals included. hMmf. 1 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/370671-pi-pico-2-pre-development-projects-discussion/page/4/#findComment-5572720 Share on other sites More sharing options...
visrealm Posted Tuesday at 01:19 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:19 PM I agree. That makes sense. GCC has taken advantage of the better Arm core where it can, leaving more time for the GPU. 1 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/370671-pi-pico-2-pre-development-projects-discussion/page/4/#findComment-5572766 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.