riffraff Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 I am working on a homebrew Bally Astrocade game which is a port of a classic coin-op/2600 game and am wondering if I can release it with the same name without worrying about any kind of legal troubles from Atari. I remember a guy called VGR, he maintained a "rarity list" for the 2600 before the Digital Press's was so popular. Anyways he had written a port of Adventure for MS-DOS and asked Atari if he could release it into the public domain for free. Atari told them that if he did, they'd sue his ass (hardly an empty threat, Atari sued people for fun back then). Anyways he never did release this even anonymously for fear of being sued. This was over 10 years ago, so maybe Atari is no longer sue-happy. Are you guys worried about any kind of problems from Atari now with Adventure II? I noticed you have © 2004 on the box and use likenesses from Adventure. What about 2600 games like Medievil Mayhem? It's obviously a Warlords game. Was the name made the way it was to avoid confusion from the original 2600 Warlords game or were there legal considerations? My game is about 70% complete. I'm looking forward to releasing this game and others after it. I'd like to know what you guys think about these issues reguarding homebrew games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atarimania75 Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 (edited) I am working on a homebrew Bally Astrocade game which is a port of a classic coin-op/2600 game and am wondering if I can release it with the same name without worrying about any kind of legal troubles from Atari. I remember a guy called VGR, he maintained a "rarity list" for the 2600 before the Digital Press's was so popular. Anyways he had written a port of Adventure for MS-DOS and asked Atari if he could release it into the public domain for free. Atari told them that if he did, they'd sue his ass (hardly an empty threat, Atari sued people for fun back then). Anyways he never did release this even anonymously for fear of being sued. This was over 10 years ago, so maybe Atari is no longer sue-happy. Are you guys worried about any kind of problems from Atari now with Adventure II? I noticed you have © 2004 on the box and use likenesses from Adventure. What about 2600 games like Medievil Mayhem? It's obviously a Warlords game. Was the name made the way it was to avoid confusion from the original 2600 Warlords game or were there legal considerations? My game is about 70% complete. I'm looking forward to releasing this game and others after it. I'd like to know what you guys think about these issues reguarding homebrew games. Not sure of any of the legal stuff but i wish you luck with it all, and i will be looking forward to some cool games from you! Edited May 14, 2007 by Atarimania75 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+-^CrossBow^- Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Ron and the rest of the Squre Trio group actually got permission from Atari to use the Adventure name and likeness for Adventure II. There was a time during Adventure II's developement when it was known as "Quest for the Golden Chalice" and other names of the ilk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted May 14, 2007 Author Share Posted May 14, 2007 Right on, thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legeek Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Craig Pell (VGR) DID release his Adventure game as "Indenture"... http://www.erasurewars.net/indenture.html However he had to release it as Freeware... http://home.hiwaay.net/~lkseitz/cvg/Indenture.html Cheers, Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bomberpunk Posted May 15, 2007 Share Posted May 15, 2007 from my personal experience... about five years ago i started coding a sequel, also called Adventure II, in Qbasic. i had contacted the original programmer Warren Robinett for permission, guidelines, and to inquire about what HE would want from a sequel. although those emails are long gone, i do remember him saying something like Adventure is just a word and that slapping a 'II' behind it does not infringe on copyrights, at least that was what he believed was correct at the time. i'm not sure if that was right, or if it was exactly what he said, but that was the gist of it. oh, and my sequel died in an early development stage if anyone was wondering, but there was a finished (and glitchy) 2-player VS mode where players ran around an empty playing field and wielded their swords ala Legend of Zelda's Link (when he was charged up with a blinking sword, a move that debuted in A Link To The Past). i wonder if i still have that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+SpiceWare Posted May 15, 2007 Share Posted May 15, 2007 What about 2600 games like Medievil Mayhem? It's obviously a Warlords game. Was the name made the way it was to avoid confusion from the original 2600 Warlords game or were there legal considerations? I named it Medieval Mayhem to follow the alliteration used by Bryan Edewaard for Castle Crisis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jboypacman Posted May 15, 2007 Share Posted May 15, 2007 Am going to have to get a Bally Astrocade now! Good luck Riff on the game and i cant wait to see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.