The Lost Super Mario Bros Game...

[MrAtari2600]

I have attempted to beat the game, leading to numerous unsuccessful outcomes.

I have gotten to 4-2. This game is amazingly hard, Im going to beat it I am determined, once i practise my Halo3 skills a bit more.

[Artlover]

I have attempted to beat the game, leading to numerous unsuccessful outcomes.

I have gotten to 4-2. This game is amazingly hard, Im going to beat it I am determined, once i practise my Halo3 skills a bit more.

I don't think it's hard actually, but the lack of side scrolling makes it impossible to play.

[+FujiSkunk]

It plays like something that you'd see on the C64

Please. Don't insult the C64 like that. It can do much better then this turd.

 

You honestly think so? I'd like to see proof.

 

Tempest

 

For one thing, the Commodore 64 has hardware support for scrolling. If a game only needs vertical or horizontal scrolling, all 16 colors can be used to create the background. Alternatively, the game can limit the background to four colors and scroll every which way possible, including diagonally.

 

In my opinion, some of the better C-64 scrollers are Sky Shark, Road Runner, The Simspons: The Arcade Game, and Ghosts 'n' Goblins (I'm an arcade game buff, what can I say?).

 

Sprites are another challenge. The C-64 only offers 8, but if you're handy with your hardware trickery, those 8 can be manipulated into many more on-screen objects, just like with the 2600.

[A Sprite]

The C64 is way ahead of anything the PC88 can do.

 

Check it out.

 

I got schooled about it in the 7800 forums, when I asked if it and the 7800 were roughly equal. They assured me the 7800 wasn't even close.