Question for SeaGtGruff

[+Random Terrain]

Your inbox is full, so I'll ask you here. I wanted to double check and be absolutely sure I'm doing the correct thing.

 

The zip file in the post below has an std_kernel.asm file from 12/28/2007:

 

http://www.atariage.com/forums/index.php?s...p;#entry1490744

 

 

The zip file in the post below has an std_kernel.asm file from 12/20/2007:

 

http://www.atariage.com/forums/index.php?s...t&p=1430601

 

 

When you get a chance, can you take a look at them and see which one should really be used? It's been a while, but I think I remember that the version with the earlier date actually worked better. I'm probably wrong, though. Just want to remove all doubt.

 

 

Thanks.

[SeaGtGruff]

The zip file in the post below has an std_kernel.asm file from 12/28/2007:

 

http://www.atariage.com/forums/index.php?s...p;#entry1490744

 

 

The zip file in the post below has an std_kernel.asm file from 12/20/2007:

 

http://www.atariage.com/forums/index.php?s...t&p=1430601

 

 

When you get a chance, can you take a look at them and see which one should really be used? It's been a while, but I think I remember that the version with the earlier date actually worked better. I'm probably wrong, though. Just want to remove all doubt.

I'm not sure which one is better to use, but the 12/20/2007 file (from batari's post) has references to "kernelmacro" in it, whereas the 12/28/2007 file (from my post) does not-- and there are a few other differences, as well. I checked in my includes folder, and I've been using the 12/28/2007 file for nearly a year without any problems. I guess it depends on if you're going to use "kernelmacro" or not?

 

Michael

[+Random Terrain]

Thanks.

[+Random Terrain]

When you get a chance, please look at this post:

 

http://www.atariage.com/forums/index.php?s...t&p=1612952

 

 

Thanks.