stinkoman Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 I just won 25 5200 games for $33.I already paid because Im a good bidder but Im wondering now If I paid too much.For me the only game Ill have and extra now is pacman.So Did I pay to much or did I get a ok deal? here is the ebay link: eBay Auction -- Item Number: 160467946230 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phuzzed Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 not counting shipping, that comes out to be $1.32 a game. So, I don't think you got a bad deal. One of the quickest and easiest ways to build your collection is to buy big lots like this on Ebay. In the end, you'll end up with some extras, but you can use those for trades/sales with other collectors. That's the beauty of the hobby Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Allan Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 I just won 25 5200 games for $33.I already paid because Im a good bidder but Im wondering now If I paid too much.For me the only game Ill have and extra now is pacman.So Did I pay to much or did I get a ok deal? here is the ebay link http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160467946230&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT No, that's not a bad deal. It means you paid less than $2 a game. Allan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+save2600 Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 Nope - good deal all the way around. Great deal considering it was ePay and there aren't any dupes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eightbit Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 That was a good deal for sure! I somewhat recently sold a lot of 50 games I think for nearly $200, so yeah, that was good. I would have snatched it up if I didn;t already have every one of them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Friedel Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 Agreed. $2-$3/game is about the norm for a 5200 common, so you came in well under that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Divya16 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Agreed. $2-$3/game is about the norm for a 5200 common, so you came in well under that. You go lucky. I paid $29.87 for just Atari 5200 Defender at Toys "R" Us in 02/03/1984. I still have the receipt if you want proof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck D. Head Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 You go lucky. I paid $29.87 for just Atari 5200 Defender at Toys "R" Us in 02/03/1984. I still have the receipt if you want proof. No, YOU got lucky. I paid about the same amount for Atari 2600 Defender in 1982 or so. Soooo disappointing. Morgan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Divya16 Posted August 22, 2010 Share Posted August 22, 2010 You go lucky. I paid $29.87 for just Atari 5200 Defender at Toys "R" Us in 02/03/1984. I still have the receipt if you want proof. No, YOU got lucky. I paid about the same amount for Atari 2600 Defender in 1982 or so. Soooo disappointing. Morgan That's worth more than my 29.87 given inflation. But you don't have a receipt to prove it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck D. Head Posted August 22, 2010 Share Posted August 22, 2010 You go lucky. I paid $29.87 for just Atari 5200 Defender at Toys "R" Us in 02/03/1984. I still have the receipt if you want proof. No, YOU got lucky. I paid about the same amount for Atari 2600 Defender in 1982 or so. Soooo disappointing. Morgan That's worth more than my 29.87 given inflation. But you don't have a receipt to prove it. Well, my point was that for the same $30-ish, you got a much better version of Defender. Morgan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.