Atari the Jedi Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 (edited) That it to be illegal for anyone to describe 5200 pac-man, super break out or centipede as rare. Had someone earlier today claimed that They had some really rare games for the Atari and it turned out to be these three. Edited November 1, 2012 by Atari the Jedi 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtariBrian Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 :rolling: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennybingo Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 That it to be illegal for anyone to describe 5200 pac-man, super break out or centipede as rare. Had someone earlier today claimed that They had some really rare games for the Atari and it turned out to be these three. I would only vote for you if you also promised to give everyone a pony...otherwise, Vermin Supreme gets my vote!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andromeda Stardust Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 (edited) Rare is a relative term. Atari 5200 Pacman is probably pretty rare compared to Budweiser cans, for instance. In the universe, life of any kind is pretty scarce too. It just so happens the Earth is crawling with it. No more guns in the hands of criminals / drug dealers would be a nice promise for society. Edited November 1, 2012 by stardust4ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtariLeaf Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 Rare is a relative term. If only my relatives were rare 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevEng Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 Rare is a relative term. Atari 5200 Pacman is probably pretty rare compared to Budweiser cans, for instance. In the universe, life of any kind is pretty scarce too. It just so happens the Earth is crawling with it. No more guns in the hands of criminals / drug dealers would be a nice promise for society. A comparison to other things is only acceptable if the comparison is explicit... "This cartridge is rare, compared to Budweiser cans." "This comic book is in mint condition, compared to ground zero of a nuclear detonation." "This car runs great, compared to a man without legs." Any implicit comparison is understood to be to the same category of item. Anything else is fraudulent, and I have little doubt that the courts would see it the same way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andromeda Stardust Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 "This comic book is in mint condition, compared to ground zero of a nuclear detonation." Epic post, LOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck D. Head Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 If only my relatives were rare I would be happy if my relatives would make themselves scarce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.