Jump to content
IGNORED

D1xx on both XL and XE computers


Dropcheck

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, kheller2 said:

Bumping an old thread.   Was there a final consensus on this ?  I'm asking for two reasons:

 

1) The new 1090 boards that are being made (would it be a benefit to it to have these lines)

2) The 800XL prototypes and working samples DID have +5 on pin 47/48 as do all 600XLs.

 

 

 

Edited by Dropcheck
previous post answered better
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would have to be patched in from the incoming line from the normal cart port I'd think.  The cartridge decides whether this signal is active or not (usually hardwired) - the computer only uses that signal as part of memory select logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, foft said:

So where does it get RD4 and RD5 from on the XL?

RD4 and RD5 are not needed for the XL.  They are needed with the XE.  With the XE, RD4, RD5, PORTB bit 0, PORTB bit 1, and PORTB bit 7, and some address lines (A15 through A11) are all needed so a PLD can determine if the EXTENB line is low or high and re-create it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...