Jump to content
IGNORED

Desert Falcon?


MrFish

Recommended Posts

Agreed. Nothing compares to the 7800 version.

960741[/snapback]

 

Well, it's not like the XL/XE's can't do smooth diagonal scrolling (take Blue Max for instance). Were they in such a hurry to get it done, or what? I can't imagine that they would look at this game before sending it out for production, and think that everything was fine. Were they on drugs? It seems like you would have to be on drugs to actually play it. This can be safely filed under the "headache-ware" section of the Atari library.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Nothing compares to the 7800 version.

960741[/snapback]

 

Well, it's not like the XL/XE's can't do smooth diagonal scrolling (take Blue Max for instance). Were they in such a hurry to get it done, or what? I can't imagine that they would look at this game before sending it out for production, and think that everything was fine. Were they on drugs? It seems like you would have to be on drugs to actually play it. This can be safely filed under the "headache-ware" section of the Atari library.

960965[/snapback]

 

Afaik,

the programmer(s) did send a lot of (alpha, beta, ...) versions and a lot of updates to Atari. Alas, Atari was so stupid to burn the wrong version. When the programmer told them, the ROMs were already burned, so Atari did not care anymore... -Andreas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Afaik,

the programmer(s) did send a lot of (alpha, beta, ...) versions and a lot of updates to Atari. Alas, Atari was so stupid to burn the wrong version. When the programmer told them, the ROMs were already burned, so Atari did not care anymore...  -Andreas.

Interesting, BTW is the "right" version floating somewhere around?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 7800 version was started by Warner no?

 

And the XL/XE version was quickly and cheaply converted by Jack no?

 

If this is the case, XL/XE Desert Falcon suffers from the same problem as 7800 Karateka: Jack too cheap to pay people to get it right.

962507[/snapback]

 

So we were "Jack-ed"...Son-sa-bit-chez...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...