Jump to content
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Star Wars: The Force Awakens - Spoiler-free movie review

Nathan Strum


Let's start at the beginning. When I first saw Star Wars in 1977, it was at the UA 150 theater in downtown Seattle. I was too young to drive, so my parents had to take me down there, a 20 mile round trip, to see the movie. Somehow, over the course of the next year or so, I managed to convince them to do that another 10 or 11 times as I saw the movie again and again. It's pretty astonishing now to think of any movie sticking around in first-run theaters for over a year, but Star Wars did it.

The one-year anniversary poster (from my original The Art of Star Wars).
I remember seeing this as an ad in the Seattle Times back in-the-day.

I will never forget the first time I saw Star Wars. I was in the front row of the balcony when that huge Star Destroyer came flying in over my head - shaking the entire theater. It was an incredible experience, especially for someone whose movie-going experience up until that point consisted of the likes of such Disney fare as The Strongest Man in the World and Herbie the Love Bug Rides Again. I was so overwhelmed by Star Wars, that I can even recall seeing it the second time, and not remembering what was going to happen next. No movie before or since has come close to having that sort of impact on me.

At the time, being a kid, the wait for the sequel seemed like an eternity. Remember, this was before home video, cable TV, or anything even remotely resembling the internet, so the only way to see Star Wars was in the theater, and once it left, it was gone. To fill the gap, there was the infamous Holiday Special (which mercifully only aired once), comic books and toys. There was also the novel Splinter of the Mind's Eye (which I read a dozen times), and The Story of Star Wars record, which had an awesome photo booklet in it. I still have mine.

My original, well-worn, first edition of Splinter of the Mind's Eye.

My original LP of The Story of Star Wars. I should listen to it again someday - it's been well over 35 years.

At the time, the only way to get any news about Star Wars was from magazines like Starlog (and yes - I still have my original issues of that, too). It was from articles like this one in particular that I tried to glean every scrap of information that I could about the sequel. Some of the rumors were outlandish, like a holographic Millennium Falcon flying off the screen, or time traveling to Earth's distant past, one had our heroes meeting a Queen of Outer Space*, and another had Mick Jagger composing the soundtrack. But still, anything related to Star Wars was eagerly gobbled up in those interminable three long years before the release of The Empire Strikes Back.

*As an aside, I suspect this might have come from the fact that in the Empire Strikes Back, the Emperor was originally played by an actress. Yep. Look it up.

Then finally, the week that the movie was going to open arrived. I had plans to go see it that Saturday with some friends. The anticipation was unbearable. And on Monday evening, before the film opened, my best friend Paul called me up, and uttered the life-changing words: "The book is out!"

"The book is out." My original copy.

I had to have it. I rushed over to the local Fred Meyer, bought it, took it home and read it cover to cover.

I'm not sure when the regret set in. Probably as soon as I finished reading it. I have no recollection of actually reading it, or what I thought of any of it. All I remember is spending the rest of the week desperately trying to forget what I'd read.

It didn't work. I knew everything that was going to happen, before it happened. When the Mynock attacked the cockpit of the Millennium Falcon, the girl sitting next to me in the theater nearly jumped out of her seat. I didn't even blink. And of course, one of the biggest movie moments of all time was totally spoiled for me. By me.


(And for those of you who got to learn about Darth Vader being Luke's father while actually watching the movie - I envy you.)

No shock. No awe. I never got to experience that singular moment that made Empire such a phenomenal movie, and the favorite of so many Star Wars fans.

Now I still loved seeing Empire. It was terrific fun and powerfully engaging to watch, from the AT-ATs on Hoth to the Falcon's flight through the asteroid field, from the Dark Side cave on Dagobah to the climactic lightsaber fight. The story, acting, effects, and characters were all elevated far above the first film. And while I can qualitatively agree it's the best of the Star Wars films, it's not my favorite. Having been spoiled, Empire lacked the emotional impact that Star Wars had on me. If I'd never read the book, I might have a very different opinion. It certainly would have been a very different movie-going experience. But Star Wars will always be my favorite, because that's the theatrical experience that had the strongest impact on me. Empire will always be second, unless something better comes along.

And so, the hard way, perhaps on the worst film possible to have spoiled, I learned about spoilers.

That's why these are Spolier-free reviews.

Too bad I couldn't have learned that lesson on pretty-much any other film. For example, Star Trek: The Motion Picture would have been just fine. I had been looking forward to that just as much as Empire, but that was phenomenally disappointing, and came out six months earlier. But then perhaps the lesson wouldn't have stuck with me so much.

As an aside, Return of the Jedi was also semi-spoiled for me while I was waiting in line to go see it, when some twit walking out of the theater said,


"They cheered Darth Vader!"

Thanks for that, jerk-face. But apart from the speeder-bike chase and a certain Princess in a metal bikini, I felt Jedi was essentially a big, Muppety, Ewok turd.** A harbinger, it would turn out, of the next three Star Wars films to come.

**I could go on for a long time about what I disliked in Jedi. But the short list is: every creature except Jabba, the Ewoks, all of the acting, all of the dialog, having the Emperor turn out to be Witchiepoo from H.R. Pufnstuf, the Lapti Nek and Ewok songs, having Darth Vader turn out to be Humpty Dumpty, and rehashing the final Death Star battle from Star Wars because George couldn't come up with a better idea.

Which brings us to Star Wars: The Force Awakens. When I'd heard J.J. Abrams was going to direct it, frankly, I couldn't have been less interested. Despite my initial somewhat positive reactions to his first and second Star Trek films, I found them unwatchable on repeated viewings. The characters were too annoying, and the stories too stupid. I got tired of the laughably bad lens flares, nausea-inducing shaky-cam, and the completely ridiculous technology used to fix gaping plot holes ("red matter" and interstellar transporter backpack, I'm looking at you).

But after a time, and as more Star Wars footage eked out in the trailers, I became more interested. Still skeptical, given the last four Star Wars movies, but willing to give it a chance. So that meant avoiding spoilers. Now, I will give Abrams credit for this: he kept a very tight lid on the film's secrets. While I'm sure plot details could be found if you dug enough, for the most part, they were absent from the mainstream internet and news media. But when showings began selling out as soon as tickets went on pre-sale, I knew there might be trouble remaining spoiler-free. I was going to be traveling around the opening date so I wasn't sure where I'd be able to see it. Even when that was settled, and although we bought our tickets in early December, the earliest date we could get good seats for was December 28th. Sure, we probably could've gotten into a multiplex screening somewhere earlier, but I detest multiplexes, and was determined to see it at a proper movie theater - in this case, The Cinerama in Seattle. Besides it recently having been fully restored into a completely state-of-the-art theater, it also features reserved seating. Well worth waiting a few extra days for, so you know where you're going to sit, without having to jockey in line with a bunch of other theater-goers. Plus, the Cinerama also doesn't run any ads before movies, keeps the trailers to a minimum (in this case, just three), and best of all - before Star Wars: The Force Awakens - they ran the classic Warner Bros. short Duck Dodgers in the 24 1/2th Century. Awesome.

The trick then, was to largely avoid the Internet and media for the ten days from the time movie opened, until I was finally able to go see it. And of course, avoid any jerks coming out of the previous screening who might be blabbing about it. :roll:

But in the end, as the lights dimmed, I had successfully avoided all spoilers. So the whole film was going to be a completely new, unknown experience to me. As the movie started, I found myself actually anticipating it. As "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away..." came onscreen, I felt a twinge of excitement that I hadn't felt since the original trilogy. But would the movie live up to it?

Well then, I guess I should get on to the review.

First, and most important, I did have fun watching it. The Force Awakens felt very much like the original trilogy, and was much better than any of the prequel trilogy. And although that may not be much of a feat, I also felt it was better than Return of the Jedi. (But note my opinions regarding ROTJ, above.) But it certainly wasn't a perfect movie.

So here are a few of the things I liked:

  • The opening title crawl. This set the tone for the movie, and is the first thing that The Phantom Menace got so horribly wrong. "The taxation of trade routes is in dispute?!" Gimme a break. No such nonsense here. We're dropped right into a compelling and instantly accessible story that we want to watch.
  • The new characters. Particularly Daisy Ridley as Rey and John Boyega as Finn. They're genuinely likable and compelling characters, and it looks like the actors are really enjoying themselves. They have great onscreen presence and chemistry, and engaging stories and character arcs. Adam Driver also does a great turn as Kylo Ren - a very different Star Wars villain, more complex than most, and unpredictable.
  • The classic characters. Here's the thing - this is clearly about handing Star Wars off to a new generation, so they don't dominate the movie. And they shouldn't. But it was still good to see them again. It wouldn't have been the same without them.
  • The action. There are some great space battles, lightsaber fights, chases, and of course, the Millennium Falcon doing what it does best. And mercifully, very little shaky cam or lens flares.
  • The design. From the effects to the sets to the costumers, this looks like Star Wars. It feels like Star Wars. This is unquestionably the same universe as the original trilogy. This is nothing like what J. J. did to Star Trek.
  • John Williams' score. Sure, he's no Mick Jagger, but hearing those familiar themes peppered throughout the film is still powerful after all these years. And I've already bought the soundtrack.
  • The surprises. There were some nice ones in the film that I didn't see coming. Not going to say anything else here. ;)

That said, there are certainly things that I didn't like:

  • The movie borrows somewhat quite very extremely heavily from the original trilogy. It gets to the point where it becomes a detriment to the movie, overshadowing everything. By far, I found this to be the most disappointing aspect of the film, as it happened throughout the movie, and I found myself continually being distracted from the new material, by old, familiar tropes. Even the characters acknowledge this onscreen at one point, and the movie almost becomes a parody of itself. I hope the sequel finds a way to be more original.
  • Some of the new characters are under-utilized, particularly the villains. Hopefully the sequel will address this, and we'll get some more depth there.
  • A lot of history has apparently happened, but little explanation is given to it. In some ways, this is a good thing (avoiding the mess of the prequels), but in others, it's confusing. I have no idea what roles the First Order or the New Republic or The Resistance have in the galaxy now, or how they got there. I don't even know who's really in charge. I suppose I need to pick up a comic book or something. Or, again, maybe more will be explained in the sequel.
  • Predictability. While a lot of the movie still had some great surprises, there were quite a few moments that were just ham-handedly telegraphed. I could see they were going to happen, and just waited for them to play out.
  • J. J.'s penchant for ridiculous technology McGuffins (like the aforementioned "red matter" and interstellar transporter from the Star Trek films), reared its ugly head again. There are a few things that were thrown in there as fanboy moments which I think can be overlooked (things that J. J. probably thought were super-cool when he was 12 years old, playing with his Star Wars toys), but there was one thing that dominated the film in the sheer scale of its ridiculousness that can only be the result of lazy writing and (again) the lack of a better idea. This was crux of the moment of self-parody that I mentioned before. The movie would have been far better-off without it.

In the end though, I enjoyed seeing Star Wars: The Force Awakens. I walked out of the theater looking forward to the next film. And although I think that's a good thing, it could be considered a knock against the film, too. I think (or hope) that the sequel will actually be the new Star Wars we're looking for. This was a welcomed reintroduction back into the franchise, but it isn't the heart of the story. Not yet. There were certainly some great moments in The Force Awakens, but also plenty of weak ones. I was in a packed theater, and while there were a few cheers or smatterings of applause here or there, there was never any one moment where the whole audience went absolutely nuts. Star Wars needs "that moment" again. It's not here. But it was still a fun movie to watch. If that's all you expect going into it, you'll do just fine. I went in expecting nothing, so I came out ahead.

Star Wars: The Force Awakens gets a 7.9/10.

  • Like 4


Recommended Comments

I loved it, and after Empire is my favorite Star Wars movie. The visuals were outstanding, very beautiful landscapes. I came out with the overall impression JJ was trying to get the fans of the original movies and the kids who grew up with the prequels all in the same boat along with a new generation of viewers. To me the master plan was to use this movie as a way to introduce all of the elements (again) and maybe start diverging the story from the next movie on.


+ Loved the new characters (Rey, Finn, BB2, Poe), aside from Kylo Ren.

+ I felt the magic at a lot of moments, and got teary eyed when the music would play a familiar theme.

- Hated all the CG characters in the film. To me JJ threw that in there to bring in the crowd that grew up with the prequels. It was a deterrent to me. Bring in an actor in a rubber suit and I would have been happy. I'm sure some shots were CG and I didn't realize, but some characters just look.... CG

- Wished JJ had been a little more daring with a new storyline. Still the script lines were better then most of the other films. I laughed when I was supposed to laugh.

- The obvious plot holes.


Still... this a great start to the new series.

Link to comment

I thought it was too stuck in the 70's overall. While Star Wars was the world for me some 30 years ago, it's universe doesn't even make it into my Top 5 nowadays, with stuff like BSG 2004, Guardians of the Galaxy, Firefly or Mass Effect around.

Episode 7 in the worst sense of the meaning felt too Disney for me. The only 'moment' we had in the cinema was when Snape Vader Jun. lifted the mask and everyone was like "Eeeek put it on again, quick!" :lolblue:

And no Boba Fett? Seriously?

Link to comment

Here are my thoughts on the movie (warning: there are spoilers in that post and in the thread in which it appeared). I agree with many of the criticisms, but as I say in my other post, I think these can be explained at least in part by the need to do "damage control" and to create buy-in among the majority of Star Wars fans who love the original trilogy but were disappointed by the prequels. Demonstrating that the "new crew" understood what the fans loved about Star Wars seems to have been more important than taking chances and being daring with the franchise and providing exposition ... at least for this first installment. It seems to have worked with the audiences I've watched it with: the movie got laughs in all the right places and applause at the end.

"The Force Awakens" ends in such a way that we're left with a strong suggestion of the outline that the story will follow in the next two movies, but I suspect that they're playing with us and that this is a deliberate setup. I have a feeling that the next movie will take more risks and chances, and will take the story in unexpected and controversial directions. (Of course, one could argue that this itself would be a "ripoff" of the original trilogy, since that's what "Empire Strikes Back" did after the first movie. There's no pleasing everybody.)

As far as Boba Fett is concerned: he's badly overexposed already, and I can't see what they would have done with him in the new movie except give him an empty "fan service" cameo, so I wasn't bothered by his absence at all.

Link to comment

(I still have my original "Story of Star Wars" LP, too, along with my original "Story of Return of the Jedi." I listened to both of them so much that neither are playable anymore; fortunately I have clean MP3 copies now. I had the original "Star Wars" novelization at one point, but I missed out on the "Extended Universe" stuff, which is probably for the best. "Splinter of the Mind's Eye" sounds very interesting, though.)

Link to comment

I thought it was too stuck in the 70's overall. While Star Wars was the world for me some 30 years ago, it's universe doesn't even make it into my Top 5 nowadays, with stuff like BSG 2004, Guardians of the Galaxy, Firefly or Mass Effect around.

I like BSG '04 (now ten years old itself), GoG, and some other new Sci-Fi franchises. But to me Star Wars' universe should have the same feel as the original trilogy, since it's the same universe, not a complete do-over like Star Trek (ick) or BSG. It should be able to retain the familiarity of the setting, but still tell new stories. That's where Awakens fell down - it shouldn't have had so much of that sameness.


And no Boba Fett? Seriously?


I too would've liked to have seen the return of the Worst Bounty Hunter in the Galaxy™. He would've been great for comic relief. He could've been bumped into by a septuagenarian Han Solo and fallen into a pit again, or had his head chopped off by a clumsy Finn. "How do you turn on this lightsaber? Oh here's the switch..." *slice* "Whoops, sorry there, Boba. Guess you should've ducked." Great fun! ;)

Link to comment

I had the original "Star Wars" novelization at one point, but I missed out on the "Extended Universe" stuff, which is probably for the best. "Splinter of the Mind's Eye" sounds very interesting, though.


I bought one of the EU novels, but never read it. There were already several others out at the time, and I just wasn't interested in spending the time to get into it.


Splinter was a great book for a young kid desperately waiting for Empire. I'm not sure how it would hold up now.

Link to comment

As far as Boba Fett is concerned: he's badly overexposed already, and I can't see what they would have done with him in the new movie except give him an empty "fan service" cameo, so I wasn't bothered by his absence at all.


Well, I heard he's getting a movie of his own in the Spin-Off Trilogy, so I will get my fix anyway ;)

Link to comment

I like BSG '04 (now ten years old itself), GoG, and some other new Sci-Fi franchises. But to me Star Wars' universe should have the same feel as the original trilogy, since it's the same universe, not a complete do-over like Star Trek (ick) or BSG. It should be able to retain the familiarity of the setting, but still tell new stories. That's where Awakens fell down - it shouldn't have had so much of that sameness.


I really thought it was a good popcorn flic, but yeah, it had 'been there done that' stamped all over it. Since Han Solo had all the good lines/jokes in it, I must say I'm much more hyped for Star Trek 13 now than for Episode 8 - Unlike you I totally dig the reboot and the new cast :D

Link to comment

I have to say the second best thing about seeing the movie is now I can watch / read / listen to other people's reviews (and see how their likes & dislikes compare to mine).


Regarding the classic characters, I'm glad they decided to make the story fit their aging rather than de-aging them to fit an earlier setting.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I agree that the 'problem' that the New Order dreamt up to terrorize the galaxy was due to just plain old lazy writing. They could have done *anything* else and it would have been more interesting (like some of the things in the Thrawn Trilogy by Timothy Zahn).


BTW, if you haven't yet read the Thrawn Trilogy, it's really, really good. I hope that the next movies nick some ideas/characters from it, as it has lots of good ones. :)

Link to comment

It's been a while since I read the thrawn trilogy, but isn't it basically about yet another death star hidden in a hyperspace bubble? :lolblue:

Link to comment

Nope, not a single Death Star to be found. I ain't sayin' what Thrawn *does* use, but it's more clever than 'Giant Space Lasers'. :)

Link to comment

I really liked Star Wars: The Force Awakens; like you, it is the only movie that was able to bring me back to that fascinating childhood moment when I saw Star Wars for the very first time. I also agree with your review, the good points and the flaws.


I do have to point out something. I don't get this new-fangled hatred towards "spoilers" in our culture. It must be an OCD nerd thing. To call someone who talks about his experience of a film a "jerk," seems overblown to me.


It's not even disappointment at the lack of wonder, as what you suggest you felt when you saw The Empires Strikes Back (which I think is some sort of hang-up in itself); it's quite real deep, active, impassioned rage against the mere act of reading, seeing, or hearing something -- anything -- related to a film.


It's absolutely mystifying and alien to me. I could be an outlier, but I also remember the times when, amongst my friends, the first person to see a great movie would tell the rest all about it -- igniting our excitement with anticipation to experience it ourselves.


That wasn't an exception -- even movie reviews and entire articles were written concurrent to the release of a movie and people still went and enjoyed the spectacle. About the only times that I recall an article would hold back a detail would be if it were crucial to a plot twist; but even then its revelation would never be met with hatred, rage, spurn, disdain, or active violence.


It seems to me that this phenomena comes from the "nerdification" of our culture, oversimplifying concepts and interactions and treating everything as an extreme "black-and-white," "us-versus-them," "enjoyment-or-spoiled," "good-and-fun-is-childish and mature-means-despair-and-gloom."


Lighten up, Internet. It's getting weird. :roll:



Link to comment
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...