Jump to content
  • entries
    41
  • comments
    373
  • views
    64,045

Superduperbug


batari

1,303 views

I have made the bug faster. It still accelerates at the same rate but will reach a top speed about 50% faster than before. Personally, I find it to be too fast, at least for this track, but maybe some like it that way.

 

Other changes include a digital speedometer and a 4-speed transmission (albeit automatic.)

 

I may also add the ability to manually shift the transmission if one desires. But a manual transmission should give additional abilities to make up for the fallibility of human shifting; maybe slightly faster acceleration or a higher top speed? Also, shifting could be done easily with the joystick (up/down) but I am not sure how to implement it with the driving controller. Any ideas?

 

Regardless, let me know if you like the latest changes.

11 Comments


Recommended Comments

Yep - seems a little too fast now, especially without an analog gas pedal.

 

One thing I'd like to see (or hear) is a different sound when you're on the grass. Maybe a higher engine pitch like the wheels are spinning.

 

As for the transmission, I like the gear shifting, but I think when starting in 2nd, 3rd and 4th, the sounds should begin at successively higher RPMs than they do in 1st, since you aren't starting from an idle in those gears.

Link to comment

You can mix two extra joystick signals with a driving controller, but there is no point with a 1P game. Just use a joystick in the other controller jack.

Link to comment

Something I just noticed: when you are moving diagonally, the playfield often moves like this when the rate of movement is, for example, down once every other frame and right once every four frames:

 

frame 1: D

frame 2: no move

frame 3: D

frame 4: R

frame 5: D

frame 6: no move

frame 7: D

frame 8: R

frame 9: D

etc.

 

I.e., the horizontal and vertical scrolling isn't synchronized.

 

That looks kind of jittery and is hard on the eyes - it would be better if, in the above example, it was like this:

frame 1: D

frame 2: no move

frame 3: D

frame 4: no move

frame 5: D and R

frame 6: no move

frame 7: D

frame 8: no move

frame 9: D and R

etc.

 

When I was working on an Arkanoid clone Manuel made the same comment with regards to the movement of the ball - and he was right, it did look much better when the horizontal and vertical movement was synchronized. :ponder:

 

Regarding the higher speed, I like it.

 

Regarding shifting - I wouldn't give any unnatural advantage to the manual shifter (like higher top speed or faster accel), but rather think through the advantages of manually shifting in a real car:

-more control, especially by downshifting

-faster accel by optimal shifting

-others...?

 

And then think about how to incorporate those. For example, you could make the automatic transmission shift slightly suboptimally so that it is possible (though difficult!) to best it when shifting manually for better acceleration. Also, you could set the automatic transmission to shift the same way always but set different optimal shifting points for different road surfaces (ice, grass, etc.), thereby giving an advantage to the skilled manual shifter.

 

That make sense?

Link to comment

it did look much better when the horizontal and vertical movement was synchronized. :ponder:

Yup, I learned the same when doing Thrust. I could have done the vertical scrolling smoothly, but it just didn't look good.

Link to comment

Thanks for all the comments. So regarding the bug's speed, maybe I can do both. The standard bug can come with the 1600cc engine, but you will be able to upgrade to a 1776cc engine if you earn enough money? I suppose other upgrades would be possible too; the main limitation as to how many I can add will be the RAM requirements, which is getting scarce.

 

I know the engine sounds like it's bogging down between gears. This was a compromise because of the limited pitch in the TIA. IMO, AUDCx=2 is perfect for a VW Bug, but there isn't much usable range in pitches. Basically there are two options: Either make the engine sound like it's bogging down a little or make the sound jerky like Indy 500. I prefer the former.

 

Real manual transmissions generally do allow for quicker acceleration and a higher top speed. The differences can be small but skilled drivers can exploit them. So allowing a manual transmission to behave slightly differently would not be unnatural. Also, I'm not sure that I've seen any games that don't give the manual transmission a slight advantage in acceleration and/or top speed. Regardless, I would make the difference subtle enough so that you'd have to be skilled to beat the automatic.

 

Regarding the scrolling, I agree that the method shown might look better, but implementation is not cut and dried. The problem is that this game does not scroll in deliberate, discrete amounts like Thrust or probably any other 4-way scrolling 2600 game (are there any others?). The physics in this game require that the X and Y screen positions have a fractional byte and the bug has X and Y fractional velocity. This is what makes skidding, friction, and all that possible. Forcing a particular scroll pattern would require unnatural tweaking of the screen's fractional bytes. There might be a way to minimize the scrolling issue but I can't think of a solution right now.

Link to comment

Mountain King scrolls in four directions. Also...Marble Craze, Subterranea, and Vanguard. Though I don't think Subterranea or Vanguard scroll horizontally *and* vertically at the same time.

Link to comment

Mountain King scrolls in four directions. Also...Marble Craze, Subterranea, and Vanguard. Though I don't think Subterranea or Vanguard scroll horizontally *and* vertically at the same time.

Good to know. So does Marble Craze scroll as you go or does it work like Thrust? I'd try it out, but I don't think the game is playable via emulation and I don't have a set of paddles handy.

Link to comment
There might be a way to minimize the scrolling issue but I can't think of a solution right now.

 

if(abs(X_fractional_velocity) > abs(Y_fractional_velocity))
{
if(MoveXNow())
{
	MoveX();
	if(MoveYNow())
	{
		MoveY();
	}
}
}
else
{
if(MoveYNow())
{
	MoveY();
	if(MoveXNow())
	{
		MoveX();
	}
}
}

 

:ponder:

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...