Jump to content
  • entries
    495
  • comments
    354
  • views
    177,241

Get SMART


Flack

898 views

If you haven't seen one in person yet, the new Smart cars are small. Really small. Like, they're so small that when you pass one (they don't pass you) you think, "That's too small to be on the road." I've seen a couple of them zipping around town, but hadn't seen one up close and personal until yesterday when Johnny drove his (and by his I mean his wife Stephanie's!) to work.

 

Smart_Car_1.jpg

 

Johnny is six-foot-two and "a lot of pounds." Yours truly is six-foot-flat and also "a lot of pounds." The Smart Car is 8.8 feet long (three feet less than a Mini Cooper), 5.1 feet tall and 5.1 feet wide. There's not a joke you can think of that didn't already pop into my mind (most of them involved Crisco) when the two of us decided to take the Smart out for a spin yesterday afternoon.

 

Surprisingly, we both fit. I'm not going to lie; it was pretty tight with two big boys inside, but we were both comfortable. The problem wasn't with leg room or head room (there was plenty of both) but in the width; then again, part of that problem was our own width more than the car's. Two average-size people (or even one XL and one average-size person) would do just fine.

 

Smart_Car_3.jpg

 

The majority of the car's interior is devoted to passenger space. The rear "storage area" located behind the car's two seats has 8 cubic feet of storage. It's enough room for three or four bags of groceries or a couple of duffle bags or suitcases (if you don't mind blocking the rear window).

 

The Smart car is "the most fuel-efficient non-hybrid gasoline-powered vehicle in the USA today," according to their website. This is due mostly to the car's tiny engine; a three-cylinder engine that puts out 70hp. The car sips gas and the website claims 33mpg in town and 41mpg on the highway, although according to owners things like hills and lower octane gas can affect those numbers. Again, I was surprised with the car's performance. While I wouldn't take it out to the drag strip anytime soon (0-60 in twelve seconds), the car seemed peppy enough to get up to speed and hold its own on the Interstate. The Smart (made by Mercedes) received a five-star crash rating, due to its steel passenger cage and six airbags. I can't imagine much would be left of the little thing, but supposedly its pretty safe for its cargo. Unfortunately, not even Mercedes could help the Smart's suspension. Even with decent shocks and 15" wheels, the car rides like any other eight-foot-long car ... kind of like a go-kart.

 

Then again, those looking for performance probably aren't buying Smart cars. What the car is designed to do, it does well. You can pretty much forget about parking problems with this baby; people are starting to pull them in nose first in between other parallel parkers. For zipping around town or saving money on morning commutes, the car's a no brainer.

 

As you can tell by the ambiguity of my post, I'm on the fence about the Smart. On one hand, if you're looking for a small car that sips on gas, the Smart delivers. The problem I have with it is you have to give up a LOT for that, including cargo space and performance. The Smart fortwo Passion (the model Johnny owns) stickers at $13,590, but you'll most likely be adding to that (extras include an alarm and power steering -- no cruise control is available).

 

One thing's for sure -- if you drive a Smart car, you had better enjoy talking to people about it. During our brief outing we were constantly being stared at and waved to. When we stopped at a gas station a lady pulled up and asked if her and her daughter could sit in it. Smart included a handful of information pamphlets with the car and now I understand why. Like the Scion XB and a few other quirky cars out there, people seem to either love the Smart car or hate it.

 

Smart_Car_2.jpg

3 Comments


Recommended Comments

I saw one of these at the airport the other week, and I couldn't believe how small it was either.

 

A couple of observations:

  1. Mercedes' quality control has been in the toilet in recent years. I wonder if this will be any better.
  2. 40 mpg is excellent, but my folks had an '82 Nissan Sentra that would get that. Why has it taken the auto manufacturers so long to get back to those numbers?
  3. You can make your own Smart car with a little time and an acetylene torch. Here's my Subaru:

minimpreza.jpg

 

Unfortunately, it still only gets 20 miles to the gallon.

 

;)

Link to comment

I used to get asked all the time about my S2000. Now it only happens when I travel.

 

40 mpg is excellent, but my folks had an '82 Nissan Sentra that would get that. Why has it taken the auto manufacturers so long to get back to those numbers?

57 mpg? That's so 20 years ago

Looking back at the 1987 Honda Civic CRX shows us why cars use so much more gas today and about the trade-offs we've had to make.

 

The CRX HF got an Environmental Protection Agency-estimated 57 mpg gallon in highway driving.

...

One answer for the mileage drop is that the rating system has changed ... If the old CRX HF were tested using today's rules, its highway fuel economy would drop to 51 mpg, according to the EPA's calculations.

...

Besides size, American consumers expect a lot more convenience out of a car than they did in 1985. Today, we expect power steering, power brakes, power windows and more.

...

Increased safety, meaning more weight from airbags and crash structure, has meant lower fuel economy.

The CR-Z may be the heir apparent to the CR-X.

Link to comment
One answer for the mileage drop is that the rating system has changed ... If the old CRX HF were tested using today's rules, its highway fuel economy would drop to 51 mpg, according to the EPA's calculations.

 

Another factor is the government-mandated dilution of gasoline with things like ethanol. I doubt that cars from earlier decades would do as well today as they did then if they had to use the gasoline that's sold today.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...