Jump to content
  • entries
    945
  • comments
    4,956
  • views
    1,221,528

Good riddance to bad rubbish... Part 2


Nathan Strum

1,143 views

So today I got rid of something else that had worn out its welcome. I promised you an ode (although perhaps not in the strictest sense), so here we go...

 

Oh Cable Company. How I hate you.

Sure, when you were new, you were special.

With more channels and better quality than a roof antenna. Or rabbit ears.

But you took advantage of me.

Raising your prices, and returning nothing.

Making me pay for channels I never watched, and taking away ones I did.

Offering yourself up for less money to other people. But only for a limited time.

Like some cheap floozy.

I never got that kind of a deal.

 

Then came internet access.

You hooked me all over again with your promises of speed.

And yes, you were better than dial-up. When you worked.

When you didn't, my modem beeped. Incessantly. Annoyingly.

How I wanted to throw that thing across the room.

And yet, I couldn't go back.

I mean c'mon... dial up? No way.

 

But where could I go?

DSL? Everyone I knew who had it, hated it.

Satellite TV? But then what to do for internet?

I can't even put up a TV antenna here. I live in a valley.

And so, I put up with it. Even as your rates climbed.

And I swear... you were backing up the billing date over the years

to try and squeeze an extra payment out of me.

 

Well, now I'm leaving you.

I've found somebody else.

Ironically, they once owned you. Now they're competing with you.

Yes, there's competition for you now.

You're no longer all there is. The only game in town. You've lost your appeal.

And you cost too much.

And you're ugly.

And your mother dresses you funny.

Good-bye Cable Company.

After eighteen long years. And a dump-truck full of my money.

It's nothing personal, except the "hating you" part.

And though I wish no harm to anyone,

I hope you go out in a giant, flaming, fireball of death.

Metaphorically speaking.

 

So how's that for an ode? :D

 

Always reaching for new cultural and literary heights, this blog is.

 

Yes, I got rid of the Cable Company today. Well, actually, I'll be getting rid of them tomorrow. But their replacement came today: AT&T's U-Verse.

 

This is basically IPTV. Sort of DSL on steroids, over fiber. With TV.

 

I've been getting ads from AT&T for months for this service, and filed it away under "sounds too good to be true" and/or "I'll wait for early adopters to find out what's horribly wrong with it". Well, I finally decided to go for it. The reason? Price.

 

Time Warner Cable (which in my area started out as King VideoCable, then MediaOne, then AT&T, then Comcast) recently broke the $100/month barrier for cable TV and internet access. That was the point at which I decided I didn't want to pay any more to them, and started looking for options. Now, price alone wasn't the only reason. My cable modem would periodically go offline (and beep annoyingly), and more recently, my TV picture had begun to periodically freeze up - and I wasn't using a cable box. So it had to be at their end of things. Some, if not all, of my channels would simply freeze on a still image. Sometimes for minutes, sometimes for hours. The service had become very unreliable, and the picture quality was generally horrible anyway. The only plus was, some HD channels had slipped through (my HDTV has a built-in tuner), and I was able to watch about 5 or 6 network affiliates in HD. Very nice for the Olympics. But SD channels were awful. Worse than they should be. This "might" have improved if I'd switched to digital cable (and gotten one of the cable company's boxes), but that would have cost me more money. That's a step in the wrong direction.

 

So last week I went into the local AT&T store and ordered up U-Verse, having researched it a fair amount online. Now, to replicate the same service I'd been getting through Time Warner would have cost me only $74/month (3 Mb/sec internet, and basic "U-100" channel line-up) - and that includes a DVR. But I decided to add HD channels (about 40 of them) and the "U-200" channel line-up, since I wanted to get DIY (I'm a hopeless "This Old House" junkie) and a few other channels that offered. Total cost? $99/month. Still cheaper than Time Warner. Eat that, cable company.

 

What's really interesting about the timing of all this though, is that I found out after I signed up, that Time Warner had cut-off the "free" HD channels I was getting. Apparently they found out people were getting something for nothing. Jerks. Well, now I'm more glad than ever I'm dumping them.

 

Now, there's a really good write-up on U-Verse here, but I'll give you my own experiences with it so far.

 

Installation

 

First, we set-up a two-hour window of time to start the installation. They were a few minutes late, but acceptable, and they called when they were about 15 minutes away. That's much nicer than just showing up whenever. Certainly better than the cable company. When you sign up, they tell you the installation can take 4-6 hours. Generally, in a house that's of newer construction, it goes much quicker. But I live in an old apartment building with no attic or crawl-spaces or access to existing wiring, except what's right at the faceplates and the main box outside. The wiring in the building was usable, but he had to improvise a little bit to make it work (using a combination of the phone line and leftover cable coax), and they had to call a service crew to come out and fix some things down the street. What surprised me - is that they did all this right on the spot. I didn't have to wait an extra day or more for it.

 

The installer was very knowledgeable, and very professional. He'd been doing this for over a year and a half, and clearly knew his stuff, and how to deal with problematic buildings like mine. He was patient, courteous, thorough, and always kept me in the loop as to what he was doing. Very unlike cable installers, which tend to come off like the Three Stooges; but the old, unfunny Three Stooges with Joe Besser.

 

Anyway, about five hours later, I was up and running. Internet, wireless router and TV. And installation was free.

 

The TV

This is what TV should look like. The DVR has component and HDMI outputs (I'm using HDMI) and the picture looks great. Even the standard def channels are scaled up to 1080i, and while it's not super-clean like an upconverting DVD player, it's much better than cable. The HD channels (and there are so many of them) look fantastic! I can't wait to watch MythBusters in HD. I've been sitting around watching the Red Sox beat up on L.A., the Food Network; and HGTV in HD all evening. Plus some standard def stuff, too.

 

I'm getting way more channels than I got with cable (for less money too, remember?), and the response when changing channels is practically instant (as opposed to changing digital channels on cable). The DVR has picture-in-picture previews when you're looking through the onscreen guide, and setting up to record programs (up to four standard def channels simultaneously, or one in HD) is a breeze. Plus - I can set it to record from any computer with web access (handy if I'm on vacation). It also handles the usual DVR stuff like pausing live TV and such. Now, I should point out I've never had a DVR before, and I was practically giddy playing with it this evening. It's not as full-featured as TiVo (as I understand) but it's a huge step up from where I was, and is more than adequate for my needs. After perusing some websites about it, I found that when it records, it just dumps the MPEG stream straight to its hard drive - no recompressing. Nice.

 

The onscreen interface is well-done, although it's too bad that it's running Windows CE (for no other reason that I'm a die-hard Mac fanatic, and it looks bad at MUG meetings). But hey, several hours into it, and no crashes yet. :ponder:;)

 

Internet access

 

The cheapest option would have been 1.5 Mbps. But I wanted some more speed than that, so I opted for 3 Mbps, knowing that I could get more speed for more money later, if I needed it. A pleasant surprise was that when I went to the AT&T store, after talking to me for a few minutes, they suggested the exact services I'd already decided I wanted. Whether it was a lucky guess or knowledgeable sales staff - I don't know. I prefer to think the latter. I mainly went with 3 Mbps since my cable modem topped out at just under 4 Mbps anyway, which had been fine for what I use the web for.

 

So far, it's been fine. Even though it tests slower than Time Warner, pages generally seem to open faster. Not sure why this is (although the much higher upload speed could have something to do with it), and maybe it's my imagination, but in general, the internet feels slightly zippier. It's not fast enough to play HD streams, but it does just fine with YouTube and other non-HD video streams. And if I need to double this to 6 Mbps, it's just another $5 a month. For what I'm getting already, the thought of having to pay a little extra doesn't bother me.

 

Here are some comparisons from speedtest.net (Time Warner is on the left, U-Verse is on the right):

 

speed-test-time-warner-1.gifatt-speedtest-1.gif

 

speed-test-time-warner-2.gifatt-speedtest-2.gif

 

speed-test-time-warner-3.gifatt-speedtest-3.gif

 

speed-test-time-warner-4.gifatt-speedtest-4.gif

 

The only glitch I've run into so far is that my existing e-mail account won't send through AT&T's SMTP server. I have to contact tech support about it. It has something to do with authorizing that particular account to use their server, but the help page for it comes up as missing. I can receive mail just fine, and the new AT&T account works as it should, but I have no plans to use it. I've had the same e-mail address for 14 years.

 

I'm sure as time goes along, I'll find some things that annoy me about U-Verse. Already I've found that there are so many TV channels, that surfing is simply out-of-the-question now. I have set up a list of favorites, but it still takes a few button presses to access them (there should just be a "favorites" button on the remote). You also can't program recordings more than two weeks in advance (although you can set up entire series or certain shows to record ad infinitum). But already I'm far happier with U-Verse than I ever was with cable. More TV, better TV, a DVR, internet access, unified billing with my phone service, and I'm saving money. Once I get the e-mail hammered out, I should be a very happy camper indeed.

 

Plus, I'm getting $100 back. I'm assuming they'll just take it off my monthly bill. But hey, it beats a punch in the throat any day.

 

I can't wait to tell the cable company. :D

18 Comments


Recommended Comments

It took awhile, and AT&T had to unblock a port for our SMTP server to work - but now I can send e-mail again!

 

Now to break the bad news to Time Warner. :(

Link to comment

Well, I'm now free!! Free from the cable company!

 

I called them up to cancel my service, and the (very polite) person on the other end of the phone asked "Is it because of price, features, or quality?" and I got to answer, "All three!" ;)

 

Now of course they wanted me to stay. It was at this point (and only at this point) that they said I could upgrade to digital cable for LESS money than I was already paying for basic cable. Less money?! Every single time I'd ever gotten an "offer" from the cable company, it was to add services for MORE money. Never had they said it would cost less. She said that they're no longer "promoting" basic cable, which is the reason. I pointed out that they should have told this to those of us with basic cable. I never got a brochure from them, a notice in my bill, nor did any of their TV commercials indicate any of this. Even at that, the cheaper rate is only for one year, after which (of course) it goes back up.

 

I said I'd stick with U-Verse, and she thanked me for being a loyal customer all these years, and said if I decided to come back they'd be sure to find me a deal that would meet my needs. (I decided not to say, "Why start now?" :()

 

Anyway, it was a very polite conversation, with a very helpful person. But it was too little, too late. If they'd told me this stuff a month ago, maybe it would be different. But Time Warner is an evil, monopolistic, conglomerate empire, so they weren't about to do that.

 

After the phone call, I took my cable modem over to the local office (since they won't stop billing until you do that). Now, contrast my experience over the phone, with that of the local office.

 

I walk in, and the HDTV they have set up in their lobby is disconnected. Not just off - but unplugged. Shouldn't they be showing off their awesome services? It's a dingy, dark, run-down little lobby too. By contrast, the AT&T store was spacious, welcoming, and had two large HDTVs showing off their service (plus umpteen-dozen cellphones on display, of course).

 

I go over to the window, and tell the guy I want to cancel my service. No concern. No trying to woo me back. No offers. Just some poor slacker who has come to the realization that the best years of his life are wasting away behind the service counter of the cable company. (I know the feeling - I actually worked for the cable company some years ago.) He types in my information, takes the modem, tosses it into a box, mutters something about a closing statement coming in the mail, and that's it. And nothing, anywhere in their lobby showed any offers to basic cable customers about how "upgrading" can save them money. For that matter, there was hardly any information about any of their services posted in there. And this is in the main building for the cable company here. Not some strip-mall hole-in-the-wall. While the phone call with them was pleasant, stepping into that office and actually dealing with someone in person reminded me what the cable company is really like.

 

Now, of course I know AT&T is also an evil monopoly. But at least it's a different evil monopoly. And competition is a very good thing.

Link to comment

I'm jealous. I wish I could switch ISPs! Cable is still the only high-speed option here that doesn't cost a fortune.

Link to comment

Me too - my only high-speed option is Comcast. Verizon provides my phone service, but FiOS isn't available here, and neither is DSL. I get great speeds with Comcast, but for about half a year they would throttle my connection to less than dial up speeds whenever I would video conference. Whenever I'd call they'd act like nothing was going on, though I knew better. They've stopped doing that, but because they lied to me I plan to switch as soon as I get another high-speed option.

 

A friend recently switched from Comcast to DirecTv and is very happy with it. He doesn't notice it, but I noticed a lot more artifacts on some of their HD channels than I'm used to seeing on Comcast. Other HD channels looked just as good so I suspect it's related to the format they receive the original signal in - they're transmitting an MPEG4 signal for most of their HD content and converting on the fly from MPEG2 makes it more susceptible to artifacts. I planning to switch(in part because of the "we're not throttle you" issue and in part because of HD channels they offer that Comcast does not, like SciFi), but need to get my roof repaired first as the back slope needs to be totally re-shingled and that's where the dish will be installed.

Link to comment
Nice to know there is another TOH junkie out there.

I was starting to go through withdrawl. I live in one of the biggest TV markets in the U.S. (Los Angeles) and despite there being a half-dozen or so PBS channels in the area, only one carried by Time Warner ever ran TOH, and that was only during the three or four weeks during the year they weren't running pledge breaks. :(

 

Now though, I can watch it pretty-much every day. ;)

Link to comment

Well, U-Verse isn't "perfect" (although really, no TV is). I've periodically had some brief "freezes" where the picture would just sit there and do nothing for a few seconds, but no worse and far less often than I was seeing with cable. Same with audio sync. Periodically, it will be a bit off - but it will catch itself back up after a few seconds. Seems to mostly happen with HD channels. These are pretty intermittent problems though. Overall, I'm still very happy with it, and I love having a DVR! Being able to program it from anywhere is very handy, since I'll often be at work late and think, "D'oh! I'm missing (fill in favorite show here)!" Now, that's no longer a problem. :(

Link to comment

So the cable company just doesn't want to break-up with me, it seems.

 

They sent me a letter saying, "We're sorry to see you go." So of course they sent me a special limited time offer. Remember my ode? Yeah. Well, they're "offering" me a "free" high-definition DVR. For two-whole-whopping-great months. Big stinking whoop. I already have an HD DVR, and guess what? I have it included as part of my U-Verse service. Not for two months - but every month. This is Time Warner's "way of saying we want you back." They also have an "All The Best" "offer" for twelve months. How nice of them.

 

Jerks.

 

They also mention "improvements" at TW cable, which are things that U-Verse already offers or exceeds for less money. The kicker? The column next to their services that says "Everyday Low Price". Cracks me up.

 

Oh Cable Company, I will miss your ironic, self-deprecating sense of humor. :(

 

And finally, as one final example of all that is the Cable Company... my final bill arrived. For -$3.31. Yes, that's right - they owe me three bucks and change. And I know I'm never going to see a penny of it.

 

Hope they choke on it.

 

Metaphorically speaking.

 

Oh, and the dumpy little cable office I walked into to close out my account?

 

A note on the bill says they're permanently shutting it down December 1st.

 

;) :D :D :D :D

 

Not that I'm gloating or anything. ;)

Link to comment

Well, it doesn't take much to surprise me anymore.

 

I got a check in the mail today from Time Warner, for the $3.31 they owed me. You could have knocked me over with a feather.

 

Sure, there's not much you can actually do with $3.31, but it's nice to have the closure. :)

 

Edit: I decided to add a picture of it, since most people have never seen a check from the cable company. :D

 

cable-check.jpg

Link to comment

The honeymoon is over.

 

This is one of the biggest loads of crap you'll ever read: AT&T is "fighting for you".

 

They just dropped HGTV, Food Network, DIY Network, Cooking Channel and GAC (couldn't care less about that last one though), because they couldn't get the price they wanted from the provider.

 

I'm paying for those channels. I regularly watch HGTV, Food Network and DIY Network. In fact, that constitutes a large percentage of what TV I do watch. Now they've shut them off, and dropped in their places other channels that I never watch. I already pay for enough channels I don't like. How is this "fighting for me"?

 

AT&T is trying to play itself off as the victim, when in fact they're just another greedy, manipulative, monopoly. Exactly the same as every other lousy TV provider out there.

 

The problem is, if they're all evil... how can you win? :D

Link to comment

They're both to blame - the providers bundle up the channels so they can charge more, just like the cable/satellite companies do with us. I'm sure a good chunk of my DirecTV bill goes to pay for all those sports channels that I never watch.

 

If the c/s companies provided unbundled channel choices to us, they'd have better leverage with the providers.

Link to comment

Perhaps both sides are to blame in some respects, however, I pay AT&T to provide me with those channels. Therefore, it's AT&T's problem to resolve if they expect to keep me as a customer.

 

In this article, AT&T says:

Again ramping up the verbiage, AT&T said: "Unfortunately, this is yet another example of a network punishing its own viewers for leverage in programming negotiations."

No... what this is, is yet another example of a TV provider attempting to hold the viewing audience hostage in an attempt to gain leverage to boost their own profits. AT&T threatens Scripps, "We'll drop you from our 2.7 million customers, unless you agree to our terms", while they plead with their viewers, "We'll be 'forced' to drop your favorite channels because they're being 'unfair' to us, but really, we're 'on your side'."

 

Who is AT&T to decide what I think is a fair price to watch what I want to watch? What's fair to me, is getting what I paid for.

Link to comment
Who is AT&T to decide what I think is a fair price to watch what I want to watch? What's fair to me, is getting what I paid for.
Kinda like my situation. I'd love to watch more channels in HD. But to receive those additional half dozen HD channels which I can't get via antenna to my existing SD cable subscription would cost me $22/month ($34/month w/ PVR). I'll live without, thanks.And I wonder when the various Canadian content creation & distribution conglomerates will start playing these kinds of games with each other. (Here in Canada a lot of channels are owned by either a cable, telephone or satellite company.)
Link to comment

AT&T has now disabled the "chat with U-Verse customers" links on their page, because the message boards were filling up with vitriolic, anti-AT&T rants.

 

Guess they didn't think that through very well.

Link to comment

Well, AT&T managed to work out their deal, so I guess I won't have to call Time Warner tomorrow.

 

In a way, it's too bad. I was looking forward to getting BBC America in HD. But at least now I don't have to re-learn all of the channel numbers.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...