Jump to content
IGNORED

a 6507 data sheet and undocumented opcode?


wogihao

Recommended Posts

Do either of these exist or did everyone just use the 6502 sheet and rember the limitations?

 

I have been looking everywhere for the 6507, or a orignaly undocumented opcode list (like what they relased for the 486 processors) for it that would be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do either of these exist or did everyone just use the 6502 sheet and rember the limitations?

 

I have been looking everywhere for the 6507, or a orignaly undocumented opcode list (like what they relased for the 486 processors) for it that would be great.

Daatasheets are here:

http://www.6502.org/documents/datasheets/

 

The 6507's differences are covered under this one, among others, though this one isn't as complete as some others:

http://www.6502.org/documents/datasheets/m...pu_nov_1985.pdf

 

As for "undocumented" opcodes, they are not intentional. They are the result of product term minimization which results in unintended operations taking place in "don't care" logic states. The fact that some of them are useful is a coincidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do either of these exist or did everyone just use the 6502 sheet and rember the limitations?

 

I have been looking everywhere for the 6507, or a orignaly undocumented opcode list (like what they relased for the 486 processors) for it that would be great.

Daatasheets are here:

http://www.6502.org/documents/datasheets/

 

The 6507's differences are covered under this one, among others, though this one isn't as complete as some others:

http://www.6502.org/documents/datasheets/m...pu_nov_1985.pdf

 

As for "undocumented" opcodes, they are not intentional. They are the result of product term minimization which results in unintended operations taking place in "don't care" logic states. The fact that some of them are useful is a coincidence.

:) Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...