Jump to content
IGNORED

2600 emulator?


Recommended Posts

A standard ST is way too slow.

 

I've got (or had) an 800 emu for the ST - it was lucky to run stuff at 20% actual speed.

 

Doing the 6502 emulation in itself isn't really an issue - but doing graphics, especially cycle-exact (which would be vital for the 2600) takes a lot of grunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A standard ST is way too slow.

 

I've got (or had) an 800 emu for the ST - it was lucky to run stuff at 20% actual speed.

 

Doing the 6502 emulation in itself isn't really an issue - but doing graphics, especially cycle-exact (which would be vital for the 2600) takes a lot of grunt.

I've used that 800 emu back in the day, only to back up A8 disk. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A standard ST is way too slow.

 

I've got (or had) an 800 emu for the ST - it was lucky to run stuff at 20% actual speed.

 

Doing the 6502 emulation in itself isn't really an issue - but doing graphics, especially cycle-exact (which would be vital for the 2600) takes a lot of grunt.

I've used that 800 emu back in the day, only to back up A8 disk. :D

 

ST-XFORMER. Great for loading and backing up disk images. Did basic routines ok. Played Zork using that.

 

Not great with player/missile graphics through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...