Jump to content
IGNORED

Glimpse at Activision Protos


Albert

Recommended Posts

http://www.atariprotos.comAtariAge and AtariProtos.com have teamed up to give you a glimpse at four presently unreleased Activision prototypes. These prototypes are for the Venetian Blinds Demo, Bloody Human Freeway, Unknown Prototype #1, and Unknown Prototype #2. Most of these prototypes are of games that were in development, while Venitian Blinds is just technical demo showing off the 2600's capabilities. Matt Reichert has played each of these prototypes extensively, taken screenshots, and written up what he's discovered about them. You can find all this and more at his website, AtariProtos.com.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atariprotos.com is a great site. I have enjoyed reading through it. I wanted to e-mail the webmaster of the site with this, but there is no option to do so. Here are some things I have questions about that I believe differ from the info on the site:

 

1. Kung Fu Master: On my cart, I cannot jump kick. However, I can punch. Trivia states the opposite to be true.

 

2. Oink!: trivia states only 3 titles ever released with "!" in the title(Oink!, Boing!, and Pitfall!). Don't forget about Kaboom!.

 

3. Grand Prix: trivia states that a world record was achieved by letting a car push the player over the finish line to propel him to a 2 second better finish time than designer David Crane thought was possible. This may be a myth because there are no other cars near the finish line! You outrun all of them well prior to the finish line. You may have this story confused with a Dragster story which I could tell you about if requested. If I am incorrect, please elaborate, because I'm very interested!

 

Activision forever! :love: 8)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@dyancey

 

There is an option to e-mail me, jut click on the picture (I'll make another link).

 

1. You're right you can punch (I guess I never noticed). I swear you can do a jump kick, I got it to work once.

 

2. Forgot about Kaboom! :D

 

3. Turns out we were both wrong. It was for Grand Prix (not Dragster), but it wasn't about being bumped by a car, it was about avoiding an invisible car. I had seen a previous story about this, but it was obviously wrong (or misleading). Check out Scott Stilphen's interview with David Crane for the details: http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Lair/9260/dc.html

 

Tempest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're talking about unknown protos/demos here .. not released games

 

Doesn't make a difference. I thought I made this clear, but I guess we all need a refresher course...

 

It's not up to me to release the roms. I was lucky enough to be granted permission to do a review on these prototypes witht the understanding that I not release the roms on any condition. Activision still owns the rights to these games, and they plan to release them as part of the Anthology project.

 

Therefore if I released the roms I would not only get in major trouble from the people who trusted me with these roms, I could also be sued by Activision. I've been told that the roms will be released when the Anthology project is ready.

 

I'm really not trying to be a hard ass here, It's just not my call to make. Sorry!

 

Tempest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not up to me to release the roms.  I was lucky enough to be granted permission to do a review on these prototypes witht the understanding that I not release the roms on any condition.  Activision still owns the rights to these games, and they plan to release them as part of the Anthology project.

 

Oh .. Ok .. Never mind ..

 

I thought someone found these in a trash bin .. Funny how trash becomes a released product.

 

Rob Mitchell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh .. Ok .. Never mind ..  

 

I thought someone found these in a trash bin .. Funny how trash becomes a released product.

 

Rob Mitchell

 

I think people have been saying that about 2600 collectors for years. :roll: Jokes aside, I'll be happy if these carts are released as part of the Anthology. HOWEVER, if it's all talk and they don't show up in the package one way or another, then they'll be just as bad as Nintendo is for pulling ROM's they never intend to release. :P Before you say "card reader," my ass. Do you realize how many "cards" you'd have to read just to load Zelda or Metroid alone? ABOUT THIRTY! And those are 20 year old games! You can forget about seeing anything MORE advanced than that. Super Mario Bros. 3? Kirby's Adventure? FUHGEDDABOUTIT. By shutting down ROM sites they're just being stubborn and greedy. Legally, they have the right; morally they don't - they just can't stand letting somebody get something for nothing whether they ever intend to make any more money off it or not. If they would release their OWN pc emulator and the ROM's for a reasonable price, maybe I wouldn't be so bitter about it. :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 By shutting down ROM sites they're just being stubborn and greedy.  Legally, they have the right; morally they don't - they just can't stand letting somebody get something for nothing whether they ever intend to make any more money off it or not.  If they would release their OWN pc emulator and the ROM's for a reasonable price, maybe I wouldn't be so bitter about it.  :roll:

 

 

Hey, you would probably would win an arguement about corporations being greedy but I don't think you realize how copyright laws work. The way they are written Nintendo and other companies HAVE to go after copyright infringers or they would eventually lose their copyright to franchises like Mario or Zelda.

 

If they didn't go after obvious copyright violations then I could release a Mario game in a couple of years and when Nintendo comes to sue me, I would point out to the courts that they weren't protecting their rights because they let people slide in the past and I might win and get to make money off Mario's name. By making some efforts to protect their properties now Nintendo is doing what the law says it has to do for this not to happen.

 

You might now agree morally but that's the way the laws are currently, if you and I own a video game business and wanted to protect our ideas and franchises we would have to do the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, you would probably would win an arguement about corporations being greedy but I don't think you realize how copyright laws work.  The way they are written Nintendo and other companies HAVE to go after copyright infringers or they would eventually lose their copyright to franchises like Mario or Zelda.

 

Actually I understand copyright law far too well. It *coughs* sort of goes along with my line of work. :roll: Just because I understand them, doesn't mean I agree with them. I could cite you any number of scholars who could say it better than I, but I prefer to sum their argument up like this: copyright was never meant to exist in perpetuity. It was meant to protect a creative work for the limited amount of time one could reasonably expect to profit from it, and then it would become part of the public domain for the benefit of all. The problem is that record labels, movie studios, and book publishers don't see any "public benefit" in giving away something for nothing, so they keep pushing Congress to expand the length of copyright over and over again to the point that things which WERE in the public domain 5-10 years ago no longer are, because some rights now extend to the absurdly long time of SEVENTY-FIVE YEARS when at one time they were *coughs* ONLY fifty!

 

If they didn't go after obvious copyright violations then I could release a Mario game in a couple of years and when Nintendo comes to sue me, I would point out to the courts that they weren't protecting their rights because they let people slide in the past and I might win and get to make money off Mario's name.  By making some efforts to protect their properties now Nintendo is doing what the law says it has to do for this not to happen.

 

You might now agree morally but that's the way the laws are currently, if you and I own a video game business and wanted to protect our ideas and franchises we would have to do the same thing.

 

The problem is that I don't honestly believe this comes down to protecting their "franchise players." Let's face it - anybody who makes a crappy clone of a Mario game and tries to sell it as a legitimately authorized Nintendo product deserves to have their butts sued off. That's not the same as letting people play Mario Bros. for free. If anything, giving people the ability to play these games would EXPAND the value of their current Mario titles, which deserve the legal protection as long as they are still marketable and worth what you pay for them. Letting people play old Mario games for nothing would get them interested in the NEW Mario games they have to pay $50 for. It's just too bad Nintendo is so short-sighted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Blue Sky Rangers has a couple of complete protos that they won't release because of "legal reasons". What I don't understand is, they had the rights to release them 20 years ago and didn't. Basically they paid for something that they didn't use, so why is it such a problem to release it now? The exposure and profit from it will be far below what it would have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...