kiwilove Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 (edited) Some more... Harvey Art-Girl--.xexAeonFlux-fanart-.xexAnneHathaway---.xex[Frozen-fanart.xexMorganFairchild-01.xexMarilynM2.xexSamus-02.xexSusanSarandon.xexVenus2-CU.xexRobby-StarryNight.xexJeriRyan-01.xexJeriRyan-02.xexSarah-Connor-.xexStarTrek-02.xexSemjase-UFO.xex Frozen-fanart.xex Model-girl.xex Tron-girl.xex WonderW-02.xex WonderW-03.xex Edited July 14, 2017 by kiwilove 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Stephen Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 Some good, some really bad. For me, a "Rasta image" is not a good one or successful if there is visible banding. Sometimes dithering helps. Sometimes, the picture will never resolve. Unfortunately for me, I can never tell what will work before I start converting an image. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwilove Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 Some good, some really bad. For me, a "Rasta image" is not a good one or successful if there is visible banding. Sometimes dithering helps. Sometimes, the picture will never resolve. Unfortunately for me, I can never tell what will work before I start converting an image. It would be nice if there was an easy way to do some relatively easy/minor retouching of the image - so as to remove any stray 'banding' that is still present - or simply to retouch eyes or whatever that need a little work on it. I'll take a guess there is no easy way to do this? And to add a zoom mode to aid in retouching - would not be an easy thing to add to this program. Is there a way to export/image an image from this file format - to another program to do retouching? Harvey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilmenit Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 It would be nice if there was an easy way to do some relatively easy/minor retouching of the image - so as to remove any stray 'banding' that is still present - or simply to retouch eyes or whatever that need a little work on it. I'll take a guess there is no easy way to do this? And to add a zoom mode to aid in retouching - would not be an easy thing to add to this program. Is there a way to export/image an image from this file format - to another program to do retouching? Harvey The easy retouching is not possible for RastaConverter because of how it works. Every few pixels you have available only 4 colors in a different palette and you cannot change this palette because it influences the rest of the picture. Tebe added ability to import RC files to Graph2Font for retouching some time ago. While the importing was problematic by itself (differences in GFX emulation) mentioned difficulty of editing discouraged even from fixing the emulation incompatibility. Not all pictures can be converted to look good on Atari. Atari has crazy limitations regarding sprites and color changes and for many pictures these limitations will prevent good output. Still a lot can be done after experimenting with different dithering settings, contrast, saturation, detail mask etc. Here is a quick convert of a picture that above had very visible banding: CmdLine: connor.png /dither=line /threads=4 /details=details.png /contrast=20 /details_val=20 /save=100000 /s=100 Having more details on the arms the picture would look quite good: Input Details Output connor.xex 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwilove Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 Here's an attempt at some retouching (adding a little detail to the eye) - taking a snapshot - then using Paint to retouch - then reinput into RastaConverter a 2nd time. But you can see there is a loss of contrast (detail) present in doing this. Maybe some other paint program would be better? But I'm only using Paint and I don't do any artwork on the PC. Have not gotten doing any more artwork via a paint program since Deluxe Paint II since about the early 90s? The first pic here - is of the normal pic - and the large pic is one I have retouched slightly in parts - before inputting below - as source / current / destination So what you need to compare is the first pic with the current pic - to see - was it worthwhile trying to do this? Harvey CharlotteRampling-01.xexCharlotte-R03.xex 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunstar Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 (edited) I guess my advice continues to be overlooked or ignored by most, but I'll give it one more shot. I think too many try and get the algorithm with it's limitations based on the Atari's limitations to conform to the source image. When The source image, through the Rasta settings, must be conformed to the what the Atari is capable of. In this case, there is very subtle shading that just plain cannot be done on the Atari, so you have to make the shading less subtle to fit the Atari's limitations. This means drastic contrast adjustment in the case of this image. You will find by conforming the image to Atari limitations, in the end, makes the results closer to the original source. But it really does take an artist's eye to get the most out of Rasta Converter, because it really is an artists tool, and not a tool to make you an artist. If you don't have an artists eye, it makes things much more difficult to understand how settings should be adjusted. The most important settings in Rasta Converter, in order, are: 1) The best palette choice for the image. 2) Contrast adjustment. 3) Color brightness adjustment. 4) Gamma adjustment. The least important settings: 1) Masking-almost worthless, IMHO, and only to be used, if need be once the picture is almost perfect, then, only minute masking in the areas where there is color banding, doing big maskings like ilmenit did doesn't help in my experience (sorry ilmenit). 2) dithering, most of the time it just makes pictures a pixelated mess. In the rare occasions where it can help, use Chess or Knoll dithering, the rest are worthless. And the dithering should be set at default or even REDUCED, increasing just increases the pixelated mess. Like ilmenit, my attempt here is what I consider quick and dirty. I KNOW, I can make it better, and get rid of the last of the color banding, but I'm only doing it to make a point, and it's the best conversion yet, of this image, IMHO. settings: Palatte laoo color distance YUV Color brightness -1 Contrast 56 Gamma 1 Solutions 42 Initial state less evaluations 65 million Dither NONE Masking NONE Threads 2 (I only ever use 1 or 2 threads, I find more than that makes it worse because the individual threads don't always mesh right with each other) NO pre-adjustments accept resizing to 320x217 My second attempt (my first attempt is ALWAYS with all default settings, even when I know going in that it will need drastic contrast adjustments, see how it is turning out, if by 20 million evals it's not looking acceptable, then start over with new settings and go from there) The name of the game is if at first you don't succeed, try, try again and lots of patience to try and try again. SaraConner.xex Edited July 15, 2017 by Gunstar 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivop Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 ... /details_val=20... 1) Masking-almost worthless, IMHO, and only to be used, if need be once the picture is almost perfect, then, only minute masking in the areas where there is color banding, doing big maskings like ilmenit did doesn't help in my experience (sorry ilmenit). I was under the same impression, i.e. a detail mask did not have much effect, but I totally overlooked and never used /details_val to make the mask have more influence on the decisions made. Guess I'll have to try it again next time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivop Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Here's an Amiga picture (Hair Dog by Cougar) 46 colours ivop-cougar-hairdog.xex 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunstar Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 (edited) I was under the same impression, i.e. a detail mask did not have much effect, but I totally overlooked and never used /details_val to make the mask have more influence on the decisions made. Guess I'll have to try it again next time. Yeah...been there...done that...yes, it has some improving effect...to the detriment of everything outside the mask...I can still get better results just by adjusting contrast, color bright and gamma. But go for it, more power to you. How did it work out for ilmenet, compared to my attempt? My last bit of advice? Go back and look to see which people have the most consistently good/great results and follow their advice on how they do it. If it's ilmenet or Mario or someone else, follow their advice. if it's you, then listen to yourself. Incredible picture above, but then, the less colors the source uses, the easier it is to get great results. Edited July 15, 2017 by Gunstar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunstar Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 (edited) Unfortunately for me, I can never tell what will work before I start converting an image. That's the reality for everyone. That's why I start with default and move on from there, try, try again. My average is about 5-10 attempts before I get results that are satisfactory to me or I decide it ain't ever going to be! That average is half what it was when I was first getting into it, so you do learn to make educated guesses, but you must start with the default and move on from there. The reality of it for me is that quite often images I think will never work turn out to be the best, in the end, and images I think will be perfect for conversion often turn out to be the ones that never make it. Edited July 15, 2017 by Gunstar 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunstar Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 (edited) By the way, something I have forgotten to mention in all my advice and tips in using Rasta Converter, that some may, or may not have noticed, is that the number of solutions I always use, no matter what the image is, is 42. This seems to make the images always turn out better, but I mainly do it in the hopes that the image I am currently converting, might turn out to be the Ultimate question, to life, the universe and everything. But then, I went quite mad about 30 years ago after reading the Douglas Adams books, so there is that. God, I need a jynnan tonnyx.... Lost In Space B9. 40 colors. LIS_B9.xex Edited July 15, 2017 by Gunstar 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Stephen Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Finally - got my rig repaired (Corsair sent out new RAM modules. Worth paying for lifetime warranty parts). Random google image search:Original - Output - Progress - Executable - Stephen_album.xex 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Stephen Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Frank Zappa - Apostrophe / Overnight Sensation Original - Output - Executable - Stephen_zappa.xex 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Stephen Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 A favourite image of mine, and a terribly hard conversion. Beautiful girl, looks SO much like my fiancee (but fiancee is 7 inch taller version). Original - Output - Executable - Stephen_isabelle.xex 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Stephen Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Just a teaser - "Douchebag": Output - Executable - Stephen_douchebag.xex 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Stephen Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Here's an Amiga picture (Hair Dog by Cougar) 46 colours ivop-cougar-hairdog.png Better than my attempt (9/7/16) Original - Output - Executable - Stephen_dog.xex 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunstar Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Better than my attempt (9/7/16) Original - Cougar_HairDog.tft21.png Output - output.png Executable - Stephen_dog.xex I think the issue here is the palette choice. It looks to me as if you used either laoo or jakub, and I think Ivop used Altirra (the one I use 99% of the time). laoo and jakub palettes have more muted colors, good for skin tones like Sara Conner above, but the deep browns and reddish colors of Ivop's hairdog look like Altirra palette. That's my guess. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunstar Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 A favourite image of mine, and a terribly hard conversion. Beautiful girl, looks SO much like my fiancee (but fiancee is 7 inch taller version). Original - isabelle.png Output - isabelle_progress.png Executable - Stephen_isabelle.xex I think you got the original and output pics mixed up here... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunstar Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Finally - got my rig repaired (Corsair sent out new RAM modules. Worth paying for lifetime warranty parts). Random google image search: Original - album.jpg Output - album.png Progress - album_progress.png Executable - Stephen_album.xex Funny you should pick a "polygon" picture, I woke up this morning deciding to attempt some images of some polygon game screen shots! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivop Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 OH-WAH-AH-AH-AH I think I'm down with the sickness... ivop-guy.xex ivop-guy2.xex 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunstar Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 (edited) The Last Starfighter: Gunstar (my name's sake). 75 colors. Original is painted 3D resin cast in front of back-lit oil on glass. Buck Rogers in the 25th Century: Starfighter and Marauder. 23 colors and 31 colors respectively. Originals are painted models. Gunstar.xex BuckRogersStarfighter (2).xex BuckRogersMarauder.xex Edited July 24, 2017 by Gunstar 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunstar Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 A correction of description: The Gunstar back-drop is acrylic on glass, not oil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunstar Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 Buck Rogers in the 25th Century: Hawk's Fighter. 60 colors. HawksFighter2.xex 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunstar Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Space Funk. 62 colors. SpaceFunk.xex 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rybags Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 That turned out well, what does the original look like? Is your av pic also an RC conversion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.