Jump to content
IGNORED

Demand for a new TT / MSTe graphic card?


Recommended Posts

Just giving a heads up to users here - trying to gauge if there is any interest in a new VME graphics card for the TT / MSTe. I can't design or produce it, just putting ideas and show of hands out there for any bright young hardware gurus who might be interested.

 

The discussion thread (and poll) is over at Atari Forum - LINK TO THREAD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always wondered what software supported these graphics cards. There can't be much since they were pretty rare.

 

Not as rare as you might think, yes rare NOW, but see here:

http://gfa.atari-use...030/htm/vme.htm

 

Add to this the Atari clones, Milan and Hades, more or less use the same concept for the video. Plenty of software works on them. Games don't as noted, becuase they hit the hardware directly, but most any GEM/Window based app works ok. Its not so much that the software supported the card, all the coder has to do is follow the proper guidelines for GEM coding and tada the app just works.

Edited by lp060
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how difficult it would be to implement the Falcon's videl in an fpga for tt/mega/mste

 

An improved Videl in FPGA has been done already - see the SuperVidel project by Nature. However, as it's designed for CT-6x upgraded Falcons, it doesn't need drivers as such (Falcon TOS 4.x supports it natively), so software would have to be written from scratch for it to be usable on a TT / MSTe. Also the SuperVidel is a highly complex design which is consequently very expensive - it's somewhat "overkill" for the TT/MSTe.

 

LP has suggested (over on the thread at Atari Forum) that an FPGA based ET4000 might be a good option, since NVDI already supports ET4000 on VME. That takes a lot of uncertainty out of the driver issue, though I've got no idea what sort of cost that would be - FPGAs are like the saffron of technology. So good and so many uses, but damn expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how difficult it would be to implement the Falcon's videl in an fpga for tt/mega/mste

 

An improved Videl in FPGA has been done already - see the SuperVidel project by Nature. However, as it's designed for CT-6x upgraded Falcons, it doesn't need drivers as such (Falcon TOS 4.x supports it natively), so software would have to be written from scratch for it to be usable on a TT / MSTe. Also the SuperVidel is a highly complex design which is consequently very expensive - it's somewhat "overkill" for the TT/MSTe.

 

LP has suggested (over on the thread at Atari Forum) that an FPGA based ET4000 might be a good option, since NVDI already supports ET4000 on VME. That takes a lot of uncertainty out of the driver issue, though I've got no idea what sort of cost that would be - FPGAs are like the saffron of technology. So good and so many uses, but damn expensive.

 

Yes, I ordered one of the SuperVidel cards. But I was suggesting a *normal* non-Super Videl. Less complex, the TOS infrastructure is already there, backwards compatible with the old Atari screen modes, and a line doubler to get onto modern screens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I ordered one of the SuperVidel cards. But I was suggesting a *normal* non-Super Videl. Less complex, the TOS infrastructure is already there, backwards compatible with the old Atari screen modes, and a line doubler to get onto modern screens.

 

Good on you, the SV is a great project - I imagine youll have a lot of fun with that :)

 

Actually I did wonder at the time the Falcon was released why Atari didn't use the Videl to make a VME graphics upgrade for the TT, combined with a TOS upgrade kit to drive it and give the TT and the TOS 4.x desktop. There's more discussion on the ET4K and other alternatives over the the Atari Forum thread, so I won't fork off that, but have a look over there to see what ideas are being kicked around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...