lucien2 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 11 hours ago, RXB said: ...my GPL code would have to be modified for things like HCHA=HCHAR but as I can not find a listing of changes it is hard to judge how much work it is going to be needed to modify GPL code to fit this GPL Assembler. A few years ago, I did a small script to convert the RXB 2012 sources to be assembled with XDT: https://forums.atariage.com/topic/233677-xdt99-new-ti-99-cross-development-tools-available/?do=findComment&comment=3747491 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralphb Posted March 16 Author Share Posted March 16 We'll figure it out together tomorrow, Rich! It's possible that something changed after I wrote the documentation. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asmusr Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 (edited) 2 hours ago, lucien2 said: A few years ago, I did a small script to convert the RXB 2012 sources to be assembled with XDT: https://forums.atariage.com/topic/233677-xdt99-new-ti-99-cross-development-tools-available/?do=findComment&comment=3747491 VBScript, an exe file and a cmd file - I don't think it will be possible to download your zip let alone run the programs on most system today. 🙂 Edited March 16 by Asmusr 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucien2 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Indeed, there was a virus in the executable. At that time, I used Windows 7 with disabled updates. I regenerated the EXE, now it's clean. No problem to run the script on Windows 10, it still works. rxb xdt.zip 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 On 4/23/2017 at 6:51 AM, lucien2 said: I did a small WSH script to convert RXB source to be assembled by xga99. Just put all the RXB source files in the same folder as "rxb.js" and double-click it. Here's what the script does: - Convert DV80 FIAD files and join them to have one source per GROM. - For comments that do not start at the beginning of the line, add "; " before the first "*" - Change "CARR" instruction to "CARRY" - Remove the last "," of incomplete DATA instructions - Change "S" instruction to "SUB" - Add missing predefined symbols at the beginning of each file - Comment the FDIV and CFI equs to remove "duplicate symbols" errors Here's the unique manual modification I did: - In SRXB3-B, two lines after MSG70, a "," was missing in the middle of a BYTE declaration I regenerated RXGB.bin with CARTSAVE from RAG objects to clear unused bytes to zero. Then I compared both RXGB.bin files (Assembled by RAG and XGA99), they are identical! rxb xdt.zip 7.64 kB · 65 downloads Cool thanks I have since corrected the comma and today hopefully I can start using XGA99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 (edited) Ok got a real problem that makes no sense. Never was a problem in Ryte Data GPL Assembler or did it crash in the RAG GPL Assembler or Theirry GPL Assembler? C:\Users\Rich\Desktop\SAMS>xga99.py srxb4.txt -o brxb4 -L lrxb4.txt : xga99, version 3.6.1 > srxb4.txt <0> 1281 - CLOG >08,V@FLG(@PABPTR) INTERNAL file ***** Error: Invalid Gd address operand: V@FLG(@PABPTR) INTERNAL FILE > srxb4.txt <0> 3357 - AND >1F,V@FLG(@PABPTR) Clear error bits for ON ERRO ***** Error: Invalid Gd address operand: V@FLG(@PABPTR) CLEAR ERROR BITS FOR ON ERRO 2 Errors found. PABPTR EQU >8304 FLG EQU >05 Why is this a Address error for xga99 but not for the other GPL Assemblers? None of these have a comment in them so why is this a Address ERROR? And there are other lines that have the same thing like OPTZ02 OR >01,V@FLG(@PABPTR) or OPTZ4 OR >06,V@FLG(@PABPTR) or CLOG >01,V@FLG(@PABPTR) Anyon have a clue why? Edited March 17 by RXB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 Well here is another error and I am clueless why it exists? C:\Users\Rich\Desktop\SAMS>xga99.py srxb6.txt -o brxb6 -L lrxb6.txt : xga99, version 3.6.1 > srxb6.txt <0> 1938 - * END * ***** Error: Syntax error 1 Error found. THIS IS THE END OF THE PROGRAM WHERE IT SAYS SYNTAX ERROR *********************************************************** * CALL VERSION(numeric-variable) * *********************************************************** VERSN DATA >0000 STRI 'VERSION' DATA $+2 CALL COMB Insure have left parenthesis XML PGMCHR Skip ( CALL SNDER Get variable info DST 2024,@FAC 11/29/2023 CALL CIFSND Convert to floating point * Assign and return to caller B LNKRTN ************************************************************** END I moved the END all the way from the * END * but get the same exact error even if it iis 20 lines from the line of ***** Why is it saying this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralphb Posted March 18 Author Share Posted March 18 Hello Rich, I think the errors above are for operand order. Instead of CLOG >08,V@FLG(@PABPTR) write CLOG V@FLG(@PABPTR),>08 Unfortunately, that won't be fixed by lucien2's script, I think. Maybe I need to enhance xga99 so that it can deal with revere operand order for some instructions? Please allow some time for me to change it. But I'm not sure what is wrong with the END. Could you share the file with me? I suspect that there are some funny control characters in the file that confuse xga99. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 18 minutes ago, ralphb said: Hello Rich, I think the errors above are for operand order. Instead of CLOG >08,V@FLG(@PABPTR) write CLOG V@FLG(@PABPTR),>08 Unfortunately, that won't be fixed by lucien2's script, I think. Maybe I need to enhance xga99 so that it can deal with revere operand order for some instructions? Please allow some time for me to change it. But I'm not sure what is wrong with the END. Could you share the file with me? I suspect that there are some funny control characters in the file that confuse xga99. Sure here it is: srxb6.txt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucien2 Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 23 minutes ago, ralphb said: I think the errors above are for operand order. Instead of CLOG >08,V@FLG(@PABPTR) write CLOG V@FLG(@PABPTR),>08 That line already exists in RXB 2012. It assembles fine. Here is the freshly generated listing, using the latest version of xga: 1309 8609 47 BR INPZ2 860A 68 1310 860B 06 G860B CALL INSU1 ; Get info about file 860C 88 860D E8 1311 * INTERNAL files get special treatment 1312 860E DA CLOG >08,V@FLG(@PABPTR) ; INTERNAL file 860F E0 8610 05 8611 04 8612 08 1313 8613 66 BS G86AD 8614 AD 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralphb Posted March 18 Author Share Posted March 18 5 minutes ago, lucien2 said: That line already exists in RXB 2012. It assembles fine. Thanks for letting me know. There's something wrong with the parsing, hence the error with the END directive. Really strange, but I'm debugging this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralphb Posted March 18 Author Share Posted March 18 Rich, the second error is in line 1938, where you have a comment, but the * is not at the beginning of the line. You'll need to replace the * by ; (or put a ; in front of it). * CPU PROGRAM FOR >8300 SCATCH PAD SUBROUTINE EXECUTE * *********************************************************** * AORG >8300 * CPUPGM DATA >8302 * CPUPGM DATA >8302 First address. * DATA >0420 * BLWP @>834A Switch contex * DATA >834A * FAC not used * DATA >04E0 * CLR @>837C Clear for GPL * DATA >837C * * DATA >045B * RT Return to GPL. * * END * <<<<<<<<< *********************************************************** 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralphb Posted March 18 Author Share Posted March 18 For the other error, could it be that some symbols are missing? I've assembled your srxb6 file, and have unknown symbols CFI, LINK, RETURN, ACTION, and BADTON. Also, a few lines where you need to add one space before the comments. Could you try lucien2's tool a try? That should introduce the missing symbols, and also fix the comments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 (edited) ******************************************************************************** PREDEFINED SYMBOLS ******************************************************************************** Symbol Table #4 (Def,alpha) 0034 ACCTON 835C ARG 0032 ATN 0036 BADTON 003B BITREV 0012 CFI 0014 CNS 002C COS 0010 CSN 8372 DATSTK 0001 DIVZER 0003 ERRIOV 0006 ERRLOG 0005 ERRNIP 0002 ERRSNN 0004 ERRSQR 0028 EXP 834A FAC 0006 FADD 000A FCOMP 0009 FDIV 0008 FMUL 836C FPERAD 0007 FSUB 0038 GETSPACE 0022 INT 0010 LINK 0018 LOCASE 002A LOG 8370 MEMSIZ 003D NAMLNK 8300 PAD 0024 PWR 0012 RETURN 000B SADD 000F SCOMP 000E SDIV 8375 SGN 002E SIN 000D SMUL 8400 SOUND 0026 SQR 000C SSUB 837C STATUS 0016 STCASE 8373 SUBSTK 0030 TAN 0007 TRIGER 004A UPCASE 836E VSPTR 0001 WRNOV 837F XPT 837E YPT 1 hour ago, ralphb said: For the other error, could it be that some symbols are missing? I've assembled your srxb6 file, and have unknown symbols CFI, LINK, RETURN, ACTION, and BADTON. Also, a few lines where you need to add one space before the comments. Could you try lucien2's tool a try? That should introduce the missing symbols, and also fix the comments. Sorry where is this tool looked for it and can not seem to find it? CFI, LINK, RETURN, ACTION and BADTON are all predefined in Ryte Data GPL Assembler why I never need EQU to define them. ASSM-DOC.txt Edited March 18 by RXB missing text Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 (edited) On 4/24/2017 at 6:37 AM, lucien2 said: I'm running Classic99 on Windows too. The assembler can generate an RPK for MESS, but I made an utility to generate a standard cartridge bin file from multiple grom objects. If you leave the default Python installation options, it just creates a 60MB "python" folder on your disk. If you uncheck all options (except "Register extension") it uses only 23MB. I don't see the need to do this anymore, since it takes only a few seconds to assemble the cartridge. Actually you can still do a CALL GPOKE in Classic99 it you turn on that option. Most XB have CALL GPOKE so it works fine. Why well you can rewrite XB from XB! Edited March 18 by RXB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucien2 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 9 hours ago, RXB said: Sorry where is this tool looked for it and can not seem to find it? Here it is. Double-click "rxb.js", it will convert the included RXB 2012 sources (to .gpl files). Double-click "rxb.cmd", it will generate RXBG.bin. rxb xdt 2.zip 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 (edited) 3 hours ago, lucien2 said: Here it is. Double-click "rxb.js", it will convert the included RXB 2012 sources (to .gpl files). Double-click "rxb.cmd", it will generate RXBG.bin. rxb xdt 2.zip 280.31 kB · 0 downloads Ok thanks, but RXB 2012 was hella long time ago. (over 12 years ago so kind old version) Considering I just released RXB 2024B and have RXB 2024C on my desktop being debugged. Edited March 19 by RXB comment added Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucien2 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Just replace the RXB 2012 sources files with your current source files before double-clicking "rxb.js". 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 (edited) 7 hours ago, lucien2 said: Just replace the RXB 2012 sources files with your current source files before double-clicking "rxb.js". What kind of files as the ones you have here are not text from Notepad? When I try to view them they look like gobbly gook? And is this a disassembler or something else? Ok it makes my source files like srxb3.txt into a 1K file srxb3.gpl but 90% of the stuff is missing? What exactly am I looking at here? No list file to read and this is even more of a mystery? gromcart.exe rxb.cmd rxb.js srxb3.gpl srxb3.txt srxb4.gpl srxb4.txt srxb5.gpl srxb5.txt srxb6.gpl srxb6.txt srxb7.gpl srxb7.txt xcommon.py xga99.py Edited March 19 by RXB missing text Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucien2 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 These are standard DV80 FIAD files. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 (edited) 3 minutes ago, lucien2 said: These are standard DV80 FIAD files. Oh I see it lists undefined EQU that have not been defined! Edited March 19 by RXB Spelling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Cool tool thanks! Does not fix srxb6.txt that crashes at END and I guess ralph is working on that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucien2 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 4 minutes ago, RXB said: Cool tool thanks! Does not fix srxb6.txt that crashes at END and I guess ralph is working on that one. The script does not take text files that have already been half-converted. It takes the DV80 files that you use with Classic99 and the rag assembler. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 8 minutes ago, lucien2 said: The script does not take text files that have already been half-converted. It takes the DV80 files that you use with Classic99 and the rag assembler. Ok did that and the .gpl files have a kind of listing but where is the rest of the file? Like srxb3 is missing most of the code? Where did it go? Or srxb7.gpl is only like 1/3rd of the entire module code? Using Ti99Dir to look at them and they are DOS files and I did use TI Files from srxb3.txt converted by Ti99Dir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucien2 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 1 minute ago, RXB said: Ok did that and the .gpl files have a kind of listing but where is the rest of the file? Like srxb3 is missing most of the code? Where did it go? Or srxb7.gpl is only like 1/3rd of the entire module code? Using Ti99Dir to look at them and they are DOS files and I did use TI Files from srxb3.txt converted by Ti99Dir The .gpl files are supposed to be the converted source files, ready to be assembled. Maybe the script is not working well with the RXB 2024 source files. Could you send the DV80 source files of RXB 2024C so I can try myself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.