JamesD Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 I found this while searching for some info on RISC instruction sets.There is a comparison between MIPS R2000 and the 80386.The difference in code density is much less than I expected.http://www.proenergia.net/ftp/colarte/Cursos%20Academicos/ARQUITECTURA%20DE%20COMPUTADORES/CLASES/1A.%20THE%20VON%20NEUMANN%20MODEL/Material%20Adicional/risc_cisc.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesD Posted August 9, 2015 Author Share Posted August 9, 2015 Some of the articles referenced at the end are interesting as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesD Posted August 9, 2015 Author Share Posted August 9, 2015 I posted it here because of the regular claims about the 6502 being RISC or influencing RISC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GroovyBee Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 I had a quick look and they based their investigation on the instructions generated by a compiler from a given algorithm. To me, that is mostly a test of compiler efficiency and not much else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesD Posted August 9, 2015 Author Share Posted August 9, 2015 (edited) I had a quick look and they based their investigation on the instructions generated by a compiler from a given algorithm. To me, that is mostly a test of compiler efficiency and not much else. I've seen assembly language programmers avoid using some instructions because it's faster to use others so you can't expect compilers to use them all. The age of the article is a problem since compilers have improved since then. Edited August 9, 2015 by JamesD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.