liquid_sky Posted June 10, 2003 Share Posted June 10, 2003 I was sitting here playing burgertime and I remembered that Peter Pepper had an unlicensed afaik sequal on the intellivision only called diner. Now, since at the time of the release the intellivision was only supported by mail order, do you think data east pretty much turned a blind eye to it? Do you think they would have been more upset if the game would have sold more copies and been on a better selling system? Remember, Midway made Ms Pacman without the ok from namco, and namco got quite angry with midway.. but then again ms pac man was a huge hit.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquid_sky Posted June 11, 2003 Author Share Posted June 11, 2003 or kc munchkin, didnt even really resemble pacman yet magnavox got sued by atari Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquid_sky Posted June 12, 2003 Author Share Posted June 12, 2003 anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vic George 2K3 Posted June 12, 2003 Share Posted June 12, 2003 KC Munchkin is NOT an "unauthorized sequel" to Pac-Man, let alone even a sequel to Pac-Man. It's a Pac-Man clone with some similarities to the original inspiration that unfortunately got the axe. Speaking on the subject, though, we do have "unauthorized sequels" for 2600 games in the form of hacks (Venture II, Yar's Defeat, Yar Vs. Yar), though I doubt they can really be called sequels at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquid_sky Posted June 12, 2003 Author Share Posted June 12, 2003 i didnt say it was one.. DIFFERENT LINE OF THINKING between us mister fire afro :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.