Jump to content
IGNORED

Atari BASIC vs. Altirra 1.55 vs. TBXL 1.5 vs. FastBASIC 3.5


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, phaeron said:

Altirra BASIC still has to use the math pack built into the OS for math operations. BASIC XE can afford to use a faster math pack as it has a lot more ROM space + a disk-based extension.

Ok, so if I understand correctly, Altirra BASIC is very fast when used with Altirra emulator, but not with real hardware. Is this a correct assumption ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Ok, so if I understand correctly, Altirra BASIC is very fast when used with Altirra emulator, but not with real hardware. Is this a correct assumption ? 

No, this is completely wrong. As I said in the other thread, there is nothing in Altirra BASIC that depends on the emulator. It is a pure 6502-based BASIC interpreter in an 8K cartridge, the same as Atari BASIC. It executes the same way in Altirra, on any other emulator, or on the real hardware.

 

Benchmark Altirra BASIC against Atari BASIC and you'll see a speed difference. It is not going to be as fast as BASIC XE, but it is faster than Atari BASIC.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Ok, so if I understand correctly, Altirra BASIC is very fast when used with Altirra emulator, but not with real hardware. Is this a correct assumption ? 

I use Altirra BASIC on an EPROM on real hardware and it works great.  It's also much faster than Atari BASIC.  Replacing the stock math pack with Fast Math F+ adds yet another performance enhancement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/1/2023 at 8:19 PM, reifsnyderb said:

Fast Math F+ adds yet another performance enhancement.

And if you don't have a burner ? Then what ? 

Also just tried OSS BASIC XE vs TURBO BASIC XL using AHL's benchmark. 

TBXL was 9 seconds faster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

And if you don't have a burner ? Then what ? 

Also just tried OSS BASIC XE vs TURBO BASIC XL using AHL's benchmark. 

TBXL was 9 seconds faster. 

Well, a lot of people have U1MB cards that could be used.  It's possible to put the OS (and math pack) in the RAM.  Also, I just figured out how to upgrade the math pack from the PBI.  So, there's options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, reifsnyderb said:

Well, a lot of people have U1MB cards that could be used.  It's possible to put the OS (and math pack) in the RAM.  Also, I just figured out how to upgrade the math pack from the PBI.  So, there's options.

 My mods are in my sig.. I don't plan on getting the U1MB. So I guess I'm SOL there. I download the Fast Math F+ .atr, tried loading the various programs on it to no avail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...