Jump to content
  • entries
    4,956
  • comments
    2,719
  • views
    1,809,770

Tell me what's wrong with .wmv format.


atari2600land

403 views

So I was going through my site when I found my old Mr. Claylegs clay animation. All the files were in .wmv format, so naturally they quit working. I read somewhere that HTML5 does not support .wmv files, so I had to go into Handbrake and convert them to .mp4. I watched the new videos to make sure I did it right. I did, but one thing struck me: They look exactly the same as the .wmv files. No difference whatsoever. So what idiot decided to make .wmv obsolete? It took me at least a half hour to do that, then put the files onto the site, then read up on how to make the videos be able to play in HTML. Finally I got it all working.

 

I want to do some more Mr. Claylegs shorts. And by short, I mean SHORT. The average "episode" is 11 seconds long. But first I have to find the digital camera charger. And make sure my Play-Doh hasn't dried up. And if it has, get more. I don't know if I can replicate the old intro style. But I'll try, because I really like its (plain) look.

3 Comments


Recommended Comments

When dealing with audio and video files it's important to understand the differences between the container format and the codec.  Confusion often arises because the filename extension typically indicates the container (e.g. WAV, AVI, MOV, MKV, OGG, MP4) but most container formats can handle a wide variety of codecs (e.g. H.264, MPEG2).  People who don't understand this will complain they can't play a particular WAV or AVI file, not understanding that their player doesn't have a decoder for the codec.

 

According to Wikipedia, WMV files are generally one of the Windows Media Video codecs in an ASF container.  In addition WMV 9 was standardized as VC-1.

 

So depending upon the codec used for your WMV files, HandBrake could have just put the exact same compressed data into an MP4 container.

 

However, looking at episode 1, it appears it's been transcoded to H.264, but probably at a high enough bit rate that the video is visually indistinguishable from the original.

 

As to why WMV is obsolete - it was a proprietary format.  Typically proprietary formats always lose to more open formats.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

.. in particular if even the format owner starts migrating to other formats that are more general and popular, which I believe Microsoft may have done.

Link to comment

I've heard that most of WMV's codecs were alterations of MPEG anyway.  My own experience with WMV is that it placed more preference for detail around the center of the frame and less around the edges, leading to a sort of blurring around the edges.  I always had trouble getting acceptable audio quality from the audio codec too, even with quality-based VBR.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...