Jump to content
Have You Played Atari Today?
2600|5200|7800|Lynx|Jaguar|Forums|Store
  • entries
    338
  • comments
    905
  • views
    260,866

Nintendo Wii ? maybe not

EricBall

Entry posted by EricBall

513 views

 Share

I've been reading & listening to Ben Heckendorn's (of VSCp fame) disenting opinions of the Wii, and I think he has some good points on why it may be doomed to failure. It comes down to two major design decisions: #1 no HDTV support & #2 unique controller which lead to three reasons why the Wii is doomed.

 

Currently I don't have an HDTV, nor any plans on buying one in the near future; and I suspect the same could be said for the majority of people. (Although with prices of HDTVs falling, I'm sure the adoption rate is now beyond the hard core early adopers.) Thus, the Wii not supporting HDTV wasn't a limitation in my mind. In fact, since the Xbox360 (and the PS3) are really geared for HDTV output, the lack of HDTV support could almost be a positive for people without HDTV. But Ben points out that consoles typically have a 5 year lifecycle, and there's a very good chance that during those 5 years HDTV will come to life. So in a couple of years, the lack of HDTV support will really start to hurt Wii. (And things like Blu-Ray, HD-DVD and the inclusion of Blu-Ray in PS3 and the XBox360 HD-DVD option will certainly drive further HDTV sales.)

 

Nintendo has been trumpetting the Wii's controller, particularly the motion sensing capabilities. So much so that Sony decided to change the PS3 controller from rumble to motion sensing very late in the development cycle. But Ben questions whether we will enjoy playing games by swinging our arms around or twitching our wrists. I know, for myself, it's very difficult not to move the controller around when I'm playing. I'll flinch or lead with the joystick. Maybe the software will move the character the way I want in response, but I think it's more likely that I'll be saying "I didn't want to do that!"

 

But more importantly, Ben points out that these two factors (combined with the significantly lower CPU/GPU power of the Wii compared to the Xbox360 and PS3) will make it significantly more difficult to develop cross-platform games for the Xbox360, PS3, PC and Wii. Yeah, I may personally avoid EA games like the plague, but those third party cross-platform games round out the library. And with the ever increasing development costs, publishers like to spread the risk and increase their customer base as much as possible. But, if it costs significantly more include the Wii in addition to the Xbox360 and PS3, or if doing so means they have to create for the lowest common denominator (the Wii) and the Xbox360 and PS3 versions suffer, then I expect the Wii will get left out in the cold. Ben also points out that the unique Wii controller will add likely cause additional problems due to the lack of comparable buttons. Yes, the Wii may be cheaper to develop for (due to it's more conventional CPU/GPU design) - but only on it's own.

 

Now, I have to say that part of me is tempted to buy the Wii at C$280, while the XBox360 and PS3 pricetags leave me gasping for breath. Sure the Wii's won't have as many Mature games as it's competition. But with a 6-year old son, I'm not going to be buying (or even renting) those games. My focus is going to be on the Marios and similar games for quite some time. With that, the Wii's Virtual Console is tempting. But, then again, I own a GC, N64, SNES and even a PS1; which means I should be able to get almost everything I would ever want from eBay. (Thought - I wonder if Nintendo is planning on using Virtual Console to test the markets for similar cellphone or PDA releases.)

 

Is the Wii doomed? Well, the future is difficult to predict, but Ben has pointed out some features considered strengths that actually may be weaknesses. The fate is ultimately in the hands of consumers - which systems and games they buy.

 Share

6 Comments

Recommended Comments

Cybergoth

I hear that "HDTV is coming!" over a dozen years now, I think it may even be around as a buzz word since the late 80's of the past millenium. This time they said it'll make its "breaktrough" along with the Soccer World Cup - yet nothing happened it seems.

Most people are happy with television as is I think :lust:

 

One major advantage Nintendo always had is "Game Design". The "All Mario" aside, their innovativeness has always been their driving power and it'll always keep them in the market.

 

Also unlike their competitors, they never have to sell their consoles at a loss :D

Link to comment
atari2600land

I'm still undecided about whether I'm going to get a Wii or not. To me, even $250 is a lot of money. It would be good because I don't have an HDTV, but bad because the only games I would be interested in are Super Paper Mario and Super Mario Galaxy. Maybe I'll wait until there's a price drop.

Link to comment
SpiceWare

I've had my HD set since 9-01 and now watch very few standard-def shows because of the poor picture quality.

 

Of course, the picture detail gained in going from NTSC to HDTV is bigger than going from PAL to HDTV.

Link to comment
jboypacman

Am not a big fan of Playstation or XBox or there "bigger"brothers,the PS3 and the XBox360.I never had a problem with the GameCube so i do have some intrest in the Wii.It is cheaper than the other two systems which is a plus.I could care less about HD TV or Blu-Ray for that matter.The controllers which i think are "neat"do worry me a small bit.I could care less about swinging or flipping my arms around like a chicken.My understand was that they were/are also coming out with a more standard controller for some games which whould be great if true.3 party support is a killer.If you dont have it,it can hurt you big time.People are fans of games like GTA or the EA sports titles.Thoses games do sell systems.(Not a big fan myself of thoses titles).What ever the out come it should be a intresting next couple years to see how these systems do.I will be playing my Atari until then.

Link to comment
EricBall

Yeah, HDTV has been a long while coming. 10 years according to Wikipedia, but I'm almost certain it's been longer than that. But if the number of true HDTVs (i.e. actual HDTV resolution & HDMI inputs) at Walmart is any indication, I think it won't be long before HDTV is the norm for anyone buying a new bigscreen (i.e. 27+") TV.

 

Of course, the the Blu-Ray / HD-DVD format war isn't helping adoption rates of them or HDTV.

Link to comment
Nathan Strum

I think the Wii will do very well. HD isn't the main consideration when buying game systems - the games themselves are. I've talked about the Wii to people who are non-gamers, and they've said, "I'd play that!" It makes video gaming more accessible to people who don't want to spend hours learning how to play today's generally over-complicated games. And while HD momentum is picking up, it's going to be some time (several years) before it replaces standard definition TV. And that just happens to be about the life expectancy of a game console anyway. :lust:

 

Nintendo is no doubt figuring this into their plans, and will have the Wii 2 (or WiiII) come out when HD is more firmly entrenched in people's homes, and the price for the technology has dropped down to something more accessible to the masses.

 

The Wii isn't the last Nintendo console. It's merely the next one.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
AtariAge
Forums
Store
General
Follow AtariAge

Copyright ©1998-2023 AtariAge

×
×
  • Create New...