+Larry Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Sure, can't hurt to try! -Larry I have a patched DOS 2.5 somewhere that replaced the RUN CARTRIDGE with TURBOBASIC. Anyone interested in that? It might give you anymore ideas about what is happening .... Let me know! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flashjazzcat Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Of course MEM.SAV must be active to do a re-run from DOS at $2080... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JAC! Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 (edited) Here is the extended version "test.xex" which outputs all CIO calls/P/A/X/Y of the $6000 loader. Press a key after each call to continue. It normally ends with BMI/Y=$88=136=EOF. Turbo.atr Edited February 20, 2012 by JAC! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+bob1200xl Posted February 20, 2012 Author Share Posted February 20, 2012 This looks useful! What are the number fields? Bob Here is the extended version "test.xex" which outputs all CIO calls/P/A/X/Y of the $6000 loader. Press a key after each call to continue. It normally ends with BMI/Y=$88=136=EOF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JAC! Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 call no. / iccom / icba / icbl / P-register / A-register / X-Register / Y-Register count / 7 = BGET / buffer address / buffer length / $31 or $81 if Y>=$80 / $10 (channel 1) / CIO Status ($01 = OK, $88 = EOF) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+bob1200xl Posted February 20, 2012 Author Share Posted February 20, 2012 The problem seems to be that reading the last sector ($ED) does NOT give you an EOF. MyDOS reads sector 1, instead - then loads DUP. On a load from DOS 2.0, it looks like it does get the 136, does a Directory and branches to Prompt. What program gives you that display? Bob call no. / iccom / icba / icbl / P-register / A-register / X-Register / Y-Register count / 7 = BGET / buffer address / buffer length / $31 or $81 if Y>=$80 / $10 (channel 1) / CIO Status ($01 = OK, $88 = EOF) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JAC! Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 (edited) Hi bob, please copy test.xex from the ATR above to your (hard)drive and start it, then post the output here. Edited February 20, 2012 by JAC! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marius Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 This topic probably does not add any extra info, but look here: http://www.atariage.com/forums/topic/177429-returning-to-turbobasic-from-dos/page__view__findpost__p__2213745 There you also find that patch for DOS 2.5 to replace the "RUN CARTRIDGE" ... it might be handy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+bob1200xl Posted February 20, 2012 Author Share Posted February 20, 2012 The TURBO file is just DOS and an AUTORUN.SYS file of TBXL - no TEST.XEX... Bob Hi bob, please copy test.xex from the ATR above to your (hard)drive and start it, then post the output here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JAC! Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Aargh, wrong file uploaded, sorry. Too many foders on C:\ error. Here's the correct one. Turbo.atr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+bob1200xl Posted February 20, 2012 Author Share Posted February 20, 2012 You can name it "TBXL_WITH_TRACE_ROUTINE.ATR". When it moves over to my HDD, you can still reference it by that name. (kept in sector 0) Thanks. Bob Aargh, wrong file uploaded, sorry. Too many foders on C:\ error. Here's the correct one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+bob1200xl Posted February 20, 2012 Author Share Posted February 20, 2012 OK -- I ran TEST.XEX on my HDD system under OmniMon and it loads all the sectors and falls back to DUP, just like before. It does not list any CIO activity at all. I tried it with the 800XL OS and it did the same. I tried it on a stock 1200XL and it ran with a list, like yours did. So, whatever you use to break into the loading chain does not work on my new hardware. How is it supposed to list the disk activity? Bob Aargh, wrong file uploaded, sorry. Too many foders on C:\ error. Here's the correct one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JAC! Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 (edited) The "test.xex" is a TurboBasic 1.5 Executable where I have exchanged the loader part at $6000 by a modified loader. See attached source. If you don't get any output at all, it means (like you mentioned before) that INIADR=$6000 is not called at all by the DOS. Do you get the "Happy Computer..." loading screen at all (that's the first INIADR segment)? Which is the device the HDD ist mapped to? "D1:"? ; ; TurboBasic XL 1.5 - CIO Lister ; Replaces the OS-RAM loader segment at $6000 ; JAC! - 2012-02-20 ; opt l+ flag = 1 ;0=original, 1=with CIO lister iccom = $0002 icbal = $0004 icbah = $0005 icbll = $0008 icblh = $0009 ; ; OS variables for XL/XE ; ; page 0 and 2 ; boot = $0009 dosvec = $000a dosini = $000c appmhi = $000e ramtop = $006a coldst = $0244 iocb0 = $0340 basicf = $03f8 ; ; PIA ; portb = $d301 ; ; ANIC ; nmien = $d40e ; ; ROM vectors ; .if flag = 0 ciov = $e456 .else ciov = loader.print_ciov .endif ; ; Code equates ; l0097 = $0097 l00a0 = $00a0 l00a1 = $00a1 l00ca = $00ca l00d4 = $00d4 ;word l00d6 = $00d6 ;word l00d8 = $00d8 l00da = $00da ;word l00dc = $00dc l208e = $208e l208f = $208f l24f8 = $24f8 lb000 = $b000 le000 = $e000 le400 = $e400 le401 = $e401 le424 = $e424 le425 = $e425 lf53a = $f53a lfffa = $fffa lfffe = $fffe l2100 = $2100 l2586 = $2586 lc95f = $c95f lc9c5 = $c9c5 lcc00 = $cc00 le604 = $e604 ; ; Start of code ; .macro m_push php pha txa pha tya pha .endm .macro m_pop pla tay pla tax pla plp .endm opt h- org $2000 ins "turbo15.bin",+0,$1542 opt h+ org $6000 ; .proc loader ldx le424 ldy le425 inx sne iny stx l24f8 sty l24f8+1 lda #$00 sta nmien sei lda #$fe sta portb lda #$ab sta lfffa lda #$24 sta LFFFa+1 lda #$d0 sta lfffe lda #$24 sta lfffe+1 lda #>lcc00 jsr copy_charset_to_ram lda #>LE000 jsr copy_charset_to_ram lda #$40 sta nmien cli lda #$ff sta portb jsr load_segments lda #$00 sta boot lda dosini ldy dosini+1 sta l208e sty l208f lda #$80 ldy #$20 sta dosini sty dosini+1 lda #$fe sta portb sta l00ca ldx #$01 stx basicf stx boot dex stx coldst jsr le604 lda #$00 sta l00a0 sta l00a1 jsr lc95f ldy #$1f ldx #$8a jsr l2586 .proc copy_autorun_bas ldy #$1e loop lda autorun_bas,y sta (l0097),y dey bpl loop .endp jsr lc9c5 lda #$ff pha lda #$ae pha jsr open_editor dec portb .proc clear_b000 lda #$00 tay loop sta lb000,y dey bpl loop .endp jmp lf53a .local autorun_bas .byte $00,$00,$19,$07,$0d,$67,$14,$19,$25,$0f,$0d .byte 'D:AUTORUN.BAS' .byte $16,$01,$00,$06,$06,$16,$16 .endl .proc open_editor lda #$ff sta portb lda #$c0 sta ramtop lsr sta appmhi+1 lda le401 pha lda le400 pha rts .endp .proc copy_charset_to_ram sta l00d4+1 ldy #$00 sty l00d4 ldx #$04 loop .proc rom_to_buffer lda #$ff sta portb loop lda (l00d4),y sta l2100,y iny bne loop .endp .proc buffer_to_ram dec portb loop lda l2100,y sta (l00d4),y iny bne loop .endp inc l00d4+1 dex bne loop rts .endp .proc load_segments ldx #$10 lda #$d6 sta iocb0+icbal,x lda #$00 sta iocb0+icbah,x sta iocb0+icblh,x lda #$04 sta iocb0+icbll,x lda #$07 sta iocb0+iccom,x jsr ciov bmi last_segment lda #<buffer_l617c sta l00da sta iocb0+icbal,x lda #>buffer_l617c sta l00da+1 sta iocb0+icbah,x lda l00d8 sbc l00d6 sta l00dc lda l00d8+1 sbc l00d6+1 sta l00dc+1 inc l00dc sne inc l00dc+1 lda l00dc sta iocb0+icbll,x lda l00dc+1 sta iocb0+icblh,x jsr ciov bmi cio_error .proc copy_to_ram dec portb ldy #$00 ldx l00dc+1 beq no_hi hi_loop lda (l00da),y sta (l00d6),y iny bne hi_loop inc l00d6+1 inc l00da+1 dex bne hi_loop no_hi ldx l00dc beq no_lo lo_loop lda (l00da),y sta (l00d6),y iny dex bne lo_loop no_lo lda #$ff sta portb .endp bmi load_segments last_segment ; lda #0 ; .byte 2 rts cio_error .if flag = 1 lda $d20a sta $d01a jmp cio_error .endif jmp (dosvec) .endp .if flag = 1 .proc print_ciov m_push inc cio_count lda cio_count jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda iocb0+iccom,x jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda iocb0+icbah,x jsr print_hex lda iocb0+icbal,x jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda iocb0+icblh,x jsr print_hex lda iocb0+icbll,x jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char m_pop jsr $e456 php sta tmpa pla sta tmpp pha stx tmpx sty tmpy lda #' ' jsr print_char lda tmpp jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda tmpa jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda tmpx jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda tmpy jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda #$9b jsr print_char key1 lda $d20f and #12 cmp #12 beq key1 key2 lda $d20f and #12 cmp #12 bne key2 ldy tmpy ldx tmpx lda tmpa plp rts tmpp .byte 0 tmpa .byte 0 tmpx .byte 0 tmpy .byte 0 .proc print_hex sta tmpa m_push lda tmpa lsr lsr lsr lsr tay lda hextab,y jsr print_char lda tmpa and #15 tay lda hextab,y jsr print_char m_pop rts tmpa .byte 0 hextab .byte '0123456789ABCDEF' .endp .proc print_char sta tmpa stx tmpx sty tmpy jsr putchar ldy tmpy ldx tmpx lda tmpa rts putchar lda $e407 pha lda $e406 pha lda tmpa rts tmpa .byte 0 tmpx .byte 0 tmpy .byte 0 .endp cio_count .byte 0 .endp .endif .endp buffer_l617c ; ini loader opt h- org $2000 ins "turbo15.bin",+$16c8 Edited February 20, 2012 by JAC! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+bob1200xl Posted February 20, 2012 Author Share Posted February 20, 2012 The HDD isn't mapped anywhere - this is all SIO from a floppy or APE. Even in 1200XL mode, which had NO PBI code at all, TBXL fails. Anyway, no HDD is in play here. Just hardware. If $6000 isn't loading TBXL - what is? How could that happen? Whoever is loading TBXL loads up through the last sector of the file, then reads sector $01, then does a Status commnd to the drive and then loads DUP. Yes, I get the Happy Computer screen and colors. Wow... that's a lot of code. Bob The "test.xex" is a TurboBasic 1.5 Executable where I have exchanged the loader part at $6000 by a modified loader. See attached source. If you don't get any output at all, it means (like you mentioned before) that INIADR=$6000 is not called at all by the DOS. Do you get the "Happy Computer..." loading screen at all (that's the first INIADR segment)? Which is the device the HDD ist mapped to? "D1:"? ; ; TurboBasic XL 1.5 - CIO Lister ; Replaces the OS-RAM loader segment at $6000 ; JAC! - 2012-02-20 ; opt l+ flag = 1 ;0=original, 1=with CIO lister iccom = $0002 icbal = $0004 icbah = $0005 icbll = $0008 icblh = $0009 ; ; OS variables for XL/XE ; ; page 0 and 2 ; boot = $0009 dosvec = $000a dosini = $000c appmhi = $000e ramtop = $006a coldst = $0244 iocb0 = $0340 basicf = $03f8 ; ; PIA ; portb = $d301 ; ; ANIC ; nmien = $d40e ; ; ROM vectors ; .if flag = 0 ciov = $e456 .else ciov = loader.print_ciov .endif ; ; Code equates ; l0097 = $0097 l00a0 = $00a0 l00a1 = $00a1 l00ca = $00ca l00d4 = $00d4 ;word l00d6 = $00d6 ;word l00d8 = $00d8 l00da = $00da ;word l00dc = $00dc l208e = $208e l208f = $208f l24f8 = $24f8 lb000 = $b000 le000 = $e000 le400 = $e400 le401 = $e401 le424 = $e424 le425 = $e425 lf53a = $f53a lfffa = $fffa lfffe = $fffe l2100 = $2100 l2586 = $2586 lc95f = $c95f lc9c5 = $c9c5 lcc00 = $cc00 le604 = $e604 ; ; Start of code ; .macro m_push php pha txa pha tya pha .endm .macro m_pop pla tay pla tax pla plp .endm opt h- org $2000 ins "turbo15.bin",+0,$1542 opt h+ org $6000 ; .proc loader ldx le424 ldy le425 inx sne iny stx l24f8 sty l24f8+1 lda #$00 sta nmien sei lda #$fe sta portb lda #$ab sta lfffa lda #$24 sta LFFFa+1 lda #$d0 sta lfffe lda #$24 sta lfffe+1 lda #>lcc00 jsr copy_charset_to_ram lda #>LE000 jsr copy_charset_to_ram lda #$40 sta nmien cli lda #$ff sta portb jsr load_segments lda #$00 sta boot lda dosini ldy dosini+1 sta l208e sty l208f lda #$80 ldy #$20 sta dosini sty dosini+1 lda #$fe sta portb sta l00ca ldx #$01 stx basicf stx boot dex stx coldst jsr le604 lda #$00 sta l00a0 sta l00a1 jsr lc95f ldy #$1f ldx #$8a jsr l2586 .proc copy_autorun_bas ldy #$1e loop lda autorun_bas,y sta (l0097),y dey bpl loop .endp jsr lc9c5 lda #$ff pha lda #$ae pha jsr open_editor dec portb .proc clear_b000 lda #$00 tay loop sta lb000,y dey bpl loop .endp jmp lf53a .local autorun_bas .byte $00,$00,$19,$07,$0d,$67,$14,$19,$25,$0f,$0d .byte 'D:AUTORUN.BAS' .byte $16,$01,$00,$06,$06,$16,$16 .endl .proc open_editor lda #$ff sta portb lda #$c0 sta ramtop lsr sta appmhi+1 lda le401 pha lda le400 pha rts .endp .proc copy_charset_to_ram sta l00d4+1 ldy #$00 sty l00d4 ldx #$04 loop .proc rom_to_buffer lda #$ff sta portb loop lda (l00d4),y sta l2100,y iny bne loop .endp .proc buffer_to_ram dec portb loop lda l2100,y sta (l00d4),y iny bne loop .endp inc l00d4+1 dex bne loop rts .endp .proc load_segments ldx #$10 lda #$d6 sta iocb0+icbal,x lda #$00 sta iocb0+icbah,x sta iocb0+icblh,x lda #$04 sta iocb0+icbll,x lda #$07 sta iocb0+iccom,x jsr ciov bmi last_segment lda #<buffer_l617c sta l00da sta iocb0+icbal,x lda #>buffer_l617c sta l00da+1 sta iocb0+icbah,x lda l00d8 sbc l00d6 sta l00dc lda l00d8+1 sbc l00d6+1 sta l00dc+1 inc l00dc sne inc l00dc+1 lda l00dc sta iocb0+icbll,x lda l00dc+1 sta iocb0+icblh,x jsr ciov bmi cio_error .proc copy_to_ram dec portb ldy #$00 ldx l00dc+1 beq no_hi hi_loop lda (l00da),y sta (l00d6),y iny bne hi_loop inc l00d6+1 inc l00da+1 dex bne hi_loop no_hi ldx l00dc beq no_lo lo_loop lda (l00da),y sta (l00d6),y iny dex bne lo_loop no_lo lda #$ff sta portb .endp bmi load_segments last_segment ; lda #0 ; .byte 2 rts cio_error .if flag = 1 lda $d20a sta $d01a jmp cio_error .endif jmp (dosvec) .endp .if flag = 1 .proc print_ciov m_push inc cio_count lda cio_count jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda iocb0+iccom,x jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda iocb0+icbah,x jsr print_hex lda iocb0+icbal,x jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda iocb0+icblh,x jsr print_hex lda iocb0+icbll,x jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char m_pop jsr $e456 php sta tmpa pla sta tmpp pha stx tmpx sty tmpy lda #' ' jsr print_char lda tmpp jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda tmpa jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda tmpx jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda tmpy jsr print_hex lda #' ' jsr print_char lda #$9b jsr print_char key1 lda $d20f and #12 cmp #12 beq key1 key2 lda $d20f and #12 cmp #12 bne key2 ldy tmpy ldx tmpx lda tmpa plp rts tmpp .byte 0 tmpa .byte 0 tmpx .byte 0 tmpy .byte 0 .proc print_hex sta tmpa m_push lda tmpa lsr lsr lsr lsr tay lda hextab,y jsr print_char lda tmpa and #15 tay lda hextab,y jsr print_char m_pop rts tmpa .byte 0 hextab .byte '0123456789ABCDEF' .endp .proc print_char sta tmpa stx tmpx sty tmpy jsr putchar ldy tmpy ldx tmpx lda tmpa rts putchar lda $e407 pha lda $e406 pha lda tmpa rts tmpa .byte 0 tmpx .byte 0 tmpy .byte 0 .endp cio_count .byte 0 .endp .endif .endp buffer_l617c ; ini loader opt h- org $2000 ins "turbo15.bin",+$16c8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russg Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 (edited) call no. / iccom / icba / icbl / P-register / A-register / X-Register / Y-Register count / 7 = BGET / buffer address / buffer length / $31 or $81 if Y>=$80 / $10 (channel 1) / CIO Status ($01 = OK, $88 = EOF) I get: count/iccmd/icba/icbl/31 or B1/ What is this? CB,C5,DF,CF,FF,E6,07/ Chan/Y=status I get 1s except 3 next to last and 88, last. Edited February 21, 2012 by russg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JAC! Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 >If $6000 isn't loading TBXL - what is? How could that happen? Whoever is loading TBXL loads up through the last sector of the file, then reads sector $01, then does a Status commnd to the drive and then loads DUP. Well, that's what happens when the INIADR=$6000 is not executed: DOS simply loads all following sements (which are in the ROM area,so they have no effect), does not find a RUNADR and hence returns to DUP. I'll create a version with multiple INIADRs to check. >What is this? CB,C5,DF,CF,FF,E6,07 Values of the accumulators when returning from CIO >Chan/Y=status I get 1s except 3 next to last and 88, last Seems CIO returns 3 instead of 1 to indicate the last byte has been read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JAC! Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Here's a test executable which goes though INIADR 3 times during loading. Every time it outputs a number (1/2/3) and waits for a key. Let's see if the INIADR calls are performed. This is what it looks like in the EMU under MyDOS before it returns to DUP. iniadr.xex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+bob1200xl Posted February 21, 2012 Author Share Posted February 21, 2012 INIADR works properly - rainbow and all. Bob Here's a test executable which goes though INIADR 3 times during loading. Every time it outputs a number (1/2/3) and waits for a key. Let's see if the INIADR calls are performed. This is what it looks like in the EMU under MyDOS before it returns to DUP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JAC! Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 (edited) >OK -- I ran TEST.XEX on my HDD system under OmniMon and it loads all the sectors and falls back to DUP, just like before. It does not list any CIO activity at all. I tried it with the 800XL OS and it did the same. I won't give up so easily :-) Here's a test.xex which outputs "?" when the $6000 loader is called, and "!" when the loading of the first segment starts. test.xex Edited February 21, 2012 by JAC! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+bob1200xl Posted February 21, 2012 Author Share Posted February 21, 2012 No characters were output - loaded TBXL and reverted to DUP, as always. I would say that it does not execute $6000... Bob >OK -- I ran TEST.XEX on my HDD system under OmniMon and it loads all the sectors and falls back to DUP, just like before. It does not list any CIO activity at all. I tried it with the 800XL OS and it did the same. I won't give up so easily :-) Here's a test.xex which outputs "?" when the $6000 loader is called, and "!" when the loading of the first segment starts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peteym5 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 (edited) That is weird Turbobasic and MyDos 4.5x does not work together on an 1200XL. With all the hardware mods, could this be an issue with the way PortB works with bank switching, turning Basic and OS on and off? I remember there were issues with different MyDOS 4.5x variants causing some software conflicts. I would have to go between pages in this thread, but did you try 4.53, 4.55, etc? Another thought with the 65816 CPU. could DOS or TB executing any undocumented (illegal) 6502 instructions or be doing JMP/JSR to the OS outside of the jump table? This is offtopic, but what are the differences between Turbobasic variants 1.5, 2.0, 2.11 etc? Any extra commands or changes in speed? I don't do much with Turbobasic XL anymore, maybe some quick tests here and there. Everygame I write now is all done in Assembly. Edited February 22, 2012 by peteym5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+bob1200xl Posted February 22, 2012 Author Share Posted February 22, 2012 Not any 1200XL - just my modified system(s). BASIC and OS work the same as an 800XL. I don't know much about TBXL, I'm afraid. Bob That is weird Turbobasic and MyDos 4.5x does not work together on an 1200XL. With all the hardware mods, could this be an issue with the way PortB works with bank switching, turning Basic and OS on and off? I remember there were issues with different MyDOS 4.5x variants causing some software conflicts. I would have to go between pages in this thread, but did you try 4.53, 4.55, etc? This is offtopic, but what are the differences between Turbobasic variants 1.5, 2.0, 2.11 etc? Any extra commands or changes in speed? I don't do much with Turbobasic XL anymore, maybe some quick tests here and there. Everygame I write now is all done in Assembly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peteym5 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Another thought with the 65816 CPU. could DOS or TB executing any undocumented (illegal) 6502 opcode. Some of those opcodes become different instructions with a different CPU. This is also a long shot, but cold TB or Mydos be doing JMP/JSR to the OS outside of the jump table? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JAC! Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 I'm getting closer. I have created a CIO tracer which yielded that MyDos uses a special CIO command $27 to load the COm file. This causes the CIOV to return back to MyDOS $1275. This routine does not perform further CIO calls and seems to skip $6000. Now I'll check what's there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+bob1200xl Posted February 24, 2012 Author Share Posted February 24, 2012 I found that my versions of MyDOS source code do not match the .OBJ code that I run (4.50). Larry found the correct code and I generated a listing and cross-reference for it. It takes a little work, so I am uploading it here. On your PC (or, whatever...), load this into WordPad, set the margins so the pages line up, and print. Bob MYDOS45.TXT MYDOS45X.TXT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.