tschak909 Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 To people running TNFS servers for #FujiNet users: A new version of TNFSD (24.0522.1) has been released. This version fixes critical bugs found while deploying the new TCP transport. Please switch to it. https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/tnfsd/releases/tag/v24.0522.1 #retrocomputing #atari8bit #apple2 #colecoadam #trs80coco 6 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMontezuma Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 6 hours ago, tschak909 said: A new version of TNFSD (24.0522.1) has been released. Only bug fixes or also changes in the TNFS protocol? I mean - is a Fujinet firmware update required? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DjayBee Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 @tschak909 Wasn't there some discussion on the Discord regarding a weird Firmware change in relation to BT? TheMontezuma might be the one to ask about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozzwald Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 5 hours ago, TheMontezuma said: Only bug fixes or also changes in the TNFS protocol? I mean - is a Fujinet firmware update required? Changes in this release are server side only. Old TCP connections were not closed and the server would not accept anymore after some time. 4 hours ago, DjayBee said: Wasn't there some discussion on the Discord regarding a weird Firmware change in relation to BT? TheMontezuma might be the one to ask about. SIO2BT support is deprecated in Fujinet due to the BT Classic lib using too much RAM. If someone wants to make it work or move to newer BT stack which I think uses less resources we will consider adding it again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DjayBee Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 2 hours ago, mozzwald said: SIO2BT support is deprecated in Fujinet due to the BT Classic lib using too much RAM. If someone wants to make it work or move to newer BT stack which I think uses less resources we will consider adding it again This is not what I was talking about. IIRC during the last two or three weeks there was some "#if" which made something else break and a comment in the source code pointed to BT. I tried to find it in Discord but could not and I also do not remember who brought it up (probably fenrock or maybe Oliver Schmidt). (Discord's search is terrible because you cannot search for word fragments or even better, Discord decides on what it searches for.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozzwald Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 7 hours ago, DjayBee said: IIRC during the last two or three weeks there was some "#if" which made something else break and a comment in the source code pointed to BT. hm, I dont remember that. I did a search and about a moth ago there was talk about BT related audio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.