Jump to content

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Lathe26 said:

Agreed that that number is a bit high.  Most sources place it at >3 million but <4 million (including Wikipedia's multiple cited sources).  However, I don't feel saying "5 million" in the press release affects the deal or how Atari will manage Intellivision moving forward.

The Wikipedia sources are only through 1983. INTV Corp sales should push it over four million, there are some unknows.  Maybe the Intellivision book coming out later this year has something about it.

 

The more than 200 titles must be a typo. Considering everything they have including those not released, it should be well over a hundred but nowhere near 200.

2 minutes ago, mr_me said:

The Wikipedia sources are only through 1983. INTV Corp sales should push it over four million, there are some unknows.  Maybe the Intellivision book coming out later this year has something about it.

 

The more than 200 titles must be a typo. Considering everything they have including those not released, it should be well over a hundred but nowhere near 200.

Maybe the M Network ports for other systems and prototypes are included. Also a bunch of the Amico games as they will get licensed back to the new Amico company.

  • Like 1

.... I'll be honest, I'll buy an Intellivision+.  I've always wanted to play Sea Battle.

 

I'd love to see that list of 200 games (especially since the Wikipedia page for the console only lists 119 released games and 43 unreleased/unfinished games total, including all publishers and licensed games), but I'm guessing it's a little premature for that.

But Atari won't get all the titles right?

 

Didn't Intellivision Entertainment sell off a couple of properties to a third party a couple years ago?  I think it was Astrosmash and Shark! Shark!, not sure if there were more.  So the library is split unless that purchase didn't go through, maybe my memory is bad and I'm not remembering right.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
3 hours ago, TrogdarRobusto said:

Owning Intellivision means we are now invested in the long-term success of the brand, which experience has taught us requires an active player and developer base. It isn't a museum piece that you put behind glass. If the homebrew developers and engineers and players had not sustained interest in the 2600 platform and our other console and PC platforms over the last 45 years I don't think Atari would be in the position we are now to do things like purchase Intellivision or launch the 2600+. 

 

Now you just need to figure out how to buy Coleco and complete the circle... Then I expect some Atari ports for my Adam.  :)

  • Like 1
37 minutes ago, Intymike said:

Maybe the M Network ports for other systems and prototypes are included. Also a bunch of the Amico games as they will get licensed back to the new Amico company.

I accounted for those, i.e. Apple II, IBM PC, Colecovision, not many there. The Aquarius catalog went back to the Aquarius people in 1983. Atari SA already aquired the M network Atari 2600 properties in a previous deal, maybe not all at the time and a few more now. It's possible it includes Amico games based on Intellivision games but again not that many. And as already pointed out, two of them already went to another company. Atari SA might already own Amico Night Stalker and Crown of Kings by previously purchasing the developer.

 

 

39 minutes ago, Albert said:

It's not a typo.

 

 ..Al

Thanks.  Maybe I should look at it differently. For example IE claimed to have rights to the Imagic catalog plus some other retro titles. Maybe some of that transfers.

 

32 minutes ago, davidmt said:

But Atari won't get all the titles right?

 

Didn't Intellivision Entertainment sell off a couple of properties to a third party a couple years ago?  I think it was Astrosmash and Shark! Shark!, not sure if there were more.  So the library is split unless that purchase didn't go through, maybe my memory is bad and I'm not remembering right.

 

 

 

 

Based on previous press releases you are correct about those two. IE didn't own all the Intellivision catalog anyway, e.g. Activision, Parker Brothers, Coleco, Imagic, and others.

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, khaibitgfx said:

What's next all the old Commodore assets...

Haha, I literally just posted elsewhere, that the next acquisition should be Hyperion Entertainment so they can own AmigaOS 3.2 / 4.1.  One of the companies associated with them declared bankruptcy not so long ago...

Edited by leech
1 minute ago, khaibitgfx said:

Well for Atari to buy as many of them old assets would be make it an ideal kingpin company as far retro goes, if there's money to be had, why not?

I already have figured out their strategy is to target the indie studios and retro gaming.  The amusing thing of this?  The AAA game industry seems to be imploding.  With Ubisoft having games with 'Ultimate Mega Supreme Edition' costing 130 USD.  The gaming sites are all being consolidated, so if one game doesn't fit their political correctness, it just gets review bombed about how evil the developers are, etc.  Indie/Retro games are selling like crazy too.  And in general, are just better games overall.

1 hour ago, Raiu said:

.... I'll be honest, I'll buy an Intellivision+.  I've always wanted to play Sea Battle.

 

I'd love to see that list of 200 games (especially since the Wikipedia page for the console only lists 119 released games and 43 unreleased/unfinished games total, including all publishers and licensed games), but I'm guessing it's a little premature for that.

Sea Battle is fun ... I had it growing up

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...