im_reg Posted October 26, 2010 Share Posted October 26, 2010 I received mine yesterday. So nice to arrive home after a Mondays work to find these on my door mat. I've put about half on at present, I'm taking my time so that they are all on perfect. I evn put my Battlesphere Gold one on. I will then look forward to sourcing the carts for the ones I'm missing. They really do look great and I think wil make me want to play my Jaguar even more now I can see from a glance what games I have. The quality of the labels is very professional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbigreddog Posted October 29, 2010 Author Share Posted October 29, 2010 BUMP! I have a few of these full end label sets complete and ready to send out! (I had a couple of people cancel their order) I have 2 sets of N64 end labels ready, I'll sell them for $75 shipped each! I have 1 set of Jaguar end labels ready, I'll let that go for $25 shipped each! I have 2 sets of 32x end labels ready, I'll let that go for $15 shipped each! 32x Full Set N64 Full Set Jaguar Full Set Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GKC Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Mine came today. Very professionly done and higly recommended if anyone is looking for an end label solution to the Jags lack of them. Now because my wife has steadier hands then me she will spend the night putting them on..... with me hovering over her shoulders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbigreddog Posted November 1, 2010 Author Share Posted November 1, 2010 Mine came today. Very professionly done and higly recommended if anyone is looking for an end label solution to the Jags lack of them. Now because my wife has steadier hands then me she will spend the night putting them on..... with me hovering over her shoulders That's funny, cause I wouldn't let my wife touch my end labels! Even though she wanted to help! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+orpheuswaking Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 I wouldn't let my wife touch my end labels! That just sounds wrong! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbigreddog Posted November 1, 2010 Author Share Posted November 1, 2010 I wouldn't let my wife touch my end labels! That just sounds wrong! I thought about that when I was typing it... But you guys understand! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+remowilliams Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Just a quick note to say that these labels are amazingly well done and have a fantastic fit on the carts! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbigreddog Posted November 1, 2010 Author Share Posted November 1, 2010 Just a quick note to say that these labels are amazingly well done and have a fantastic fit on the carts! Awesome! Glad you like them! I'm very proud of these labels. Took a lot of time and test prints to get them just right! BTW, I don't have anymore $25 Jaguar labels left, But can always do the setup and print more. But they will be back at the $40 price if anyone is still interested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goochman Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 IF anyone missed out - at $40 these are still a steal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+orpheuswaking Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Stop tempting me... I don't NEED these labels... even though they do look fricken awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GKC Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 (edited) Stop tempting me... I don't NEED these labels... even though they do look fricken awesome. Well the rest of us will save time on finding the game we want quickly. Saved time = more game time Seriously though, not only do they serve a practical purpose but they really add something to the look of the cart if anyone cares about that. I am not sure why Atari would not put a label on their carts to begin with. Sure to open up the cart you would have to lift the label or just rip it off put you have to do something like that to the face label anyways to get to the screws. Seriously was there any good reason not to have labels? Edited November 1, 2010 by GKC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevincal Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Probably a cost saving measure by Atari. Same with the Sega 32X, both companies didn't want or couldnt pump a whole lot of money into these systems... Atari had a shoestring budget, if they hadnt won millions from sega the jag prolly would have died even before the Jag cd came out... I still say Atari did a good job with the money they had to work with. after all we still love the system Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GKC Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Probably a cost saving measure by Atari. Same with the Sega 32X, both companies didn't want or couldnt pump a whole lot of money into these systems... Atari had a shoestring budget, if they hadnt won millions from sega the jag prolly would have died even before the Jag cd came out... I still say Atari did a good job with the money they had to work with. after all we still love the system Well then I must say; thank you Sega! I wonder what Nintendo's excuse was? I wouldn't think it would be money I can understand Atari not doing it because of funds but Nintendo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbigreddog Posted November 1, 2010 Author Share Posted November 1, 2010 (edited) IF anyone missed out - at $40 these are still a steal. Agreed! Stop tempting me... I don't NEED these labels... even though they do look fricken awesome. Come on! You know you want them! Probably a cost saving measure by Atari. Same with the Sega 32X, both companies didn't want or couldnt pump a whole lot of money into these systems... Atari had a shoestring budget, if they hadnt won millions from sega the jag prolly would have died even before the Jag cd came out... I still say Atari did a good job with the money they had to work with. after all we still love the system Well then I must say; thank you Sega! I wonder what Nintendo's excuse was? I wouldn't think it would be money I can understand Atari not doing it because of funds but Nintendo? Nintendo knew 10 years later that someone like me was going to make them! Edited November 1, 2010 by mrbigreddog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevincal Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 (edited) Probably a cost saving measure by Atari. Same with the Sega 32X, both companies didn't want or couldnt pump a whole lot of money into these systems... Atari had a shoestring budget, if they hadnt won millions from sega the jag prolly would have died even before the Jag cd came out... I still say Atari did a good job with the money they had to work with. after all we still love the system Well then I must say; thank you Sega! I wonder what Nintendo's excuse was? I wouldn't think it would be money I can understand Atari not doing it because of funds but Nintendo? good point on the nintendo thing, you got me there its actually funny how similar the n64 and jag are... similar in many ways. big power 64 bit cart systems with lack of games (compared to rivals), no end labels, failed add ons, funky but good controllers and most importantly, the good games on each system are so kick ass that they totally negate anything bad about the systems tetrisphere was originally developed on the jag but after the jag died nintendo bought it and put it on the n64. back to similarities, both systems are the same color and similar size and both are very cool looking, artistic. Both systems had similar 32 bit rivals that had many more games. Both systems were released too late to have the impact they were meant to have. Imagine if the Jag came out halloween 1992 and n64 halloween 1995... imagine if both originally came with a cd drive and dd drive respectively... there might not have been a playstation 2 or 3 if some of these things were true. And then there is the king of "what if" companies, Sega... Edited November 2, 2010 by kevincal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GKC Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Probably a cost saving measure by Atari. Same with the Sega 32X, both companies didn't want or couldnt pump a whole lot of money into these systems... Atari had a shoestring budget, if they hadnt won millions from sega the jag prolly would have died even before the Jag cd came out... I still say Atari did a good job with the money they had to work with. after all we still love the system Well then I must say; thank you Sega! I wonder what Nintendo's excuse was? I wouldn't think it would be money I can understand Atari not doing it because of funds but Nintendo? good point on the nintendo thing, you got me there its actually funny how similar the n64 and jag are... similar in many ways. big power 64 bit cart systems with lack of games (compared to rivals), no end labels, failed add ons, funky but good controllers and most importantly, the good games on each system are so kick ass that they totally negate anything bad about the systems tetrisphere was originally developed on the jag but after the jag died nintendo bought it and put it on the n64. back to similarities, both systems are the same color and similar size and both are very cool looking, artistic. Both systems had similar 32 bit rivals that had many more games. Both systems were released too late to have the impact they were meant to have. Imagine if the Jag came out halloween 1992 and n64 halloween 1995... imagine if both originally came with a cd drive and dd drive respectively... there might not have been a playstation 2 or 3 if some of these things were true. And then there is the king of "what if" companies, Sega... Star fox, Cybermorph Mario Kart, Atari Karts Mario 64......... Aliens vs..... Never mind Anyways it is really strange that the last of the cart. consoles (32x, Jag, N64) all decided against labels. They all must have thought labels were "so last gen." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atarian1 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 tetrisphere was originally developed on the jag but after the jag died nintendo bought it and put it on the n64.. Actually, Tetrisphere was called Phear on the Jaguar and was one of the most impressive titles early in the Jaguar's life. However, f@#$%* Nintendo saw it and paid them to stop developing the Jaguar version and make it exclusively for the N64. I still hate Nintendo. :x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbigreddog Posted November 2, 2010 Author Share Posted November 2, 2010 heh... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevincal Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Probably a cost saving measure by Atari. Same with the Sega 32X, both companies didn't want or couldnt pump a whole lot of money into these systems... Atari had a shoestring budget, if they hadnt won millions from sega the jag prolly would have died even before the Jag cd came out... I still say Atari did a good job with the money they had to work with. after all we still love the system Well then I must say; thank you Sega! I wonder what Nintendo's excuse was? I wouldn't think it would be money I can understand Atari not doing it because of funds but Nintendo? good point on the nintendo thing, you got me there its actually funny how similar the n64 and jag are... similar in many ways. big power 64 bit cart systems with lack of games (compared to rivals), no end labels, failed add ons, funky but good controllers and most importantly, the good games on each system are so kick ass that they totally negate anything bad about the systems tetrisphere was originally developed on the jag but after the jag died nintendo bought it and put it on the n64. back to similarities, both systems are the same color and similar size and both are very cool looking, artistic. Both systems had similar 32 bit rivals that had many more games. Both systems were released too late to have the impact they were meant to have. Imagine if the Jag came out halloween 1992 and n64 halloween 1995... imagine if both originally came with a cd drive and dd drive respectively... there might not have been a playstation 2 or 3 if some of these things were true. And then there is the king of "what if" companies, Sega... Star fox, Cybermorph Mario Kart, Atari Karts Mario 64......... Aliens vs..... Never mind Anyways it is really strange that the last of the cart. consoles (32x, Jag, N64) all decided against labels. They all must have thought labels were "so last gen." Yep more similarities there! Another one I thought of is both Nintendo and Atari had a guru programmer (Miyamoto, Minter) Both start with M's lol.. Ya wonder why they all opted for no end labels.. hmm.. tetrisphere was originally developed on the jag but after the jag died nintendo bought it and put it on the n64.. Actually, Tetrisphere was called Phear on the Jaguar and was one of the most impressive titles early in the Jaguar's life. However, f@#$%* Nintendo saw it and paid them to stop developing the Jaguar version and make it exclusively for the N64. I still hate Nintendo. :x Ya I know it was called Phear on the Jag. When did Nintendo pay off the Phear team? Pretty sure it was late 1995 when everyone knew Atari and the Jag were dying anyway.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbigreddog Posted November 2, 2010 Author Share Posted November 2, 2010 I understand that the Jaguar was never really programmed to it's prime potential. But would Phear/Tetrisphere really run that well on it? Hell, even N64 emulators have problems with that game! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevincal Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 well i think phear wasnt completed yet on the Jag and when it became Tetrisphere it was spruced up a bit to take advantage of the N64 I do believe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+LS650 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 (edited) For years I've read how the Jaguar almost got Phear/Tetrisphere. I finally got a chance to play this on the N64 a while ago. I don't see what all the fuss is; it's not a bad game, but it ain't no Tempest 2000. Edited November 3, 2010 by ls650 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevincal Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 thats for sure, Tempest 2000 is the better game. Though Tetrisphere is some good fun with great music. I thought of more similarities between the Jag and N64. Game box packaging is very similar. Also both systems have a lot of quirky accessories. ok, sorry i guess im straying off topic... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbigreddog Posted November 3, 2010 Author Share Posted November 3, 2010 Need some help guys! Having problems trying to find artwork for Skycopter and the System Test Cart Beta/Test/Flash Cart Package Alien vs. Predator Beta B&C bypass Fight For Life Beta Flashcart Iron Soldier Beta Painter Skunkboard (front and top label) Skycopter Speedster 2 Tiny Toon Adventures Atari Jaguar system test cart Here's what I have so far, Let me know what you think. Also which IRON SOLDIER BETA top label you like best! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neo_rg Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 check this video at 2.11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.