ggn Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, SebRmv said: Where should I report bugs? This one produces a segmentation fault. http://jlhconsulting.gotdns.com/bugs/buglist.cgi?component=Core&product=RMAC&resolution=---&list_id=388 but this thread is ok too. Edited September 3, 2020 by ggn Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-4623863 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggn Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 3 hours ago, SebRmv said: Where should I report bugs? ;;; address register = base of var array VARREG equ 2 .macro emitInstr ;; \1 = instruction move.w \1,(a1)+ .endm .macro emitTgtMem ;; \1 = opcode ;; \2 = variable number (will be multiplied by 2) ;; \3 = address register number add.w \2,\2 beq.s .opt\~ emitInstr #(\1)|(%101<<6)|((\3)<<9) bra.s .done\~ .opt\~: emitInstr #(\1)|(%010<<6)|((\3)<<9) .done\~: .endm ;; emit "move.w #YYyy,xx(Var)" emitTgtMem (%0011<<12)|(%111100),d0,VARREG This one produces a segmentation fault. Ok, issue found. Head over to token.h, lines 131 and 132 and change the "32" to "64". Also read the comment, you just broke a record ;). I'll have a discussion with Shamus on how to handle with this but you should be fine for now... 1 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-4623986 Share on other sites More sharing options...
SebRmv Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 LOL And thanks, now I can assemble AW 4 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-4624038 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggn Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 rmac v2.1.8 is now out. Quite a few bug fixes (apologies to those who reported these and were waiting for the official release) and a statically linked binary for Linux as there were people asking for this. http://rmac.is-slick.com Changelog: Fixed bug where rmac would crash if a too complex expression was entered in a line. Thanks to Zorro of Ghost for the report. Fixed handling of RMACPATH environment variable. Thanks to James Jones for the report and fix! Harden RISC register parser. Thanks to DrTypo for the report. Fixed bug where expressions that contained the star character (*) would be treated as absolute when .ORG is active. Many thanks to James Jones for the report. Fixed bug where symbols redefined using SET more than once would be assembled to the last value. Emit an error when “.opt +o” or “.opt ~o” is encountered (i.e. no arguments) Don’t touch o10 (AKA op) when +/~Oall is called Fix .goto directive Improvements in reporting errors inside macros Experimental static Linux build (64-bit only) Enjoy! 5 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-4840785 Share on other sites More sharing options...
+BitJag Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 I downloaded RMAC from github yesterday and noticed the build process was complaining about the patch file that we were using to get Removers Library to build. Didn't use the patch this time, and everything seems to be working. Thanks for you work on this. 2 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-4840817 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggn Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 rmac v2.2.2 has just been released. http://rmac.is-slick.com Here is a list of changes since 2.1.8: ds directive now works with expressions that have undefined symbols (as long as they are resolved by the end of assembling) equr has been overhauled and now works with all target architectures Label names clashing with register names is now restricted to target architecture register names. As an example, this means that a label name of “a:” is now illegal only if the selected architecture has a register name “a” (at the time of writing: DSP56001 and 6502) Printing a listing with -l* now doesn’t print \f characters when printing the symbol table Register and Condition Code equates are now not exported as symbols Fix for exported symbols in ELF object Fix for incbin corner case We are now offering experimental Apple M1 builds. These are untested, so any feedback is welcome .REPT blocks (including nested) now support unique generated names (using \~) Robustness enhancements in .incbin Changes in optimisation flags strategy As of now, all optimisation flags are off by default (previously O0, O1 and O2 were on by default). New optimisation flags introduced targetting the 56001 O10 enables the use of short format for immediate values (when possible) O11 automatically converts short addressing mode to long O10 (also known as Op) moved to O30 Also, as mentioned in the page above, there is now a syntax highlighting file for the editor 10x. This should highlight correctly all rmac keywords, operands, registers, comments, etc and not a random subset like most 68k syntax highlighting plugins do. As always, thanks to everyone who reported bugs. And with that: enjoy! 7 3 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066161 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 (edited) Would you consider adding the "-4" option I added to handle operator precedence like C does? Edit: Update my fork as well. Edited May 31, 2022 by 42bs Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066166 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggn Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 I'd at least check it out if I knew about it . Github UI is a bit confusing as it shows all the v2.2.2 diffs and probably your fixes. Could I trouble you to produce a .diff file so I can check it out? Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066208 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 1 hour ago, ggn said: I'd at least check it out if I knew about it . Github UI is a bit confusing as it shows all the v2.2.2 diffs and probably your fixes. Could I trouble you to produce a .diff file so I can check it out? Yes, it is only expr.c/rmac.c. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066236 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 Here the patch files. expr.patch rmac.patch 1 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066266 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericde45 Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 hello thanks for the update Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066345 Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilinger Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 9 hours ago, ggn said: Also, as mentioned in the page above, there is now a syntax highlighting file for the editor 10x. This should highlight correctly all rmac keywords, operands, registers, comments, etc and not a random subset like most 68k syntax highlighting plugins do. I'm not familiar with the 10x Editor, could you briefly told me the main reason(s) leading this support? Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066349 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggn Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 16 minutes ago, dilinger said: I'm not familiar with the 10x Editor, could you briefly told me the main reason(s) leading this support? Just what you'd expect really, but for what it's worth: I'm using 10x I like it very much I added rmac highlighting support for it Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066356 Share on other sites More sharing options...
+cubanismo Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 Is the 10x syntax highlighting auto-generated from the rmac keyword files? Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066450 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 12 hours ago, ggn said: I'm using 10x I like it very much Gave it a try, but there is a lot missing IMHO. For example it indents always TAB width. You cannont quickly change editor tabs. Biggest "but" for me: It is C/C++ only (yet). I see, it can be extended with Python (at least not Lisp ) and there is already a VIM mode. As soon as there is an Emacs mode, I will try it again. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066618 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggn Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 (edited) 23 hours ago, 42bs said: Here the patch files. expr.patch 2.54 kB · 2 downloads rmac.patch 1.69 kB · 4 downloads Thanks, filed in the issue tracker 17 hours ago, cubanismo said: Is the 10x syntax highlighting auto-generated from the rmac keyword files? Nope, that was literally me fiddling for an hour with the syntax highlighting and using pretty much all the .tab files from the source code. 8 hours ago, 42bs said: Gave it a try, but there is a lot missing IMHO. It wasn't my intention to start editor wars :). My secret hope was that maybe others would submit rmac highlighting rules for other editors :D. Edited June 1, 2022 by ggn Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066722 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, ggn said: t wasn't my intention to start editor wars :). My secret hope was that maybe others would submit rmac highlighting rules for other editors :D. No war! I always try new editors. Most are hell slow, so at least 10x is on a good way (reminds we when Tempus came out ) But every time I fall back to emacs (maybe I am just to old for new key bindings). 1 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5066726 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted June 5, 2022 Share Posted June 5, 2022 Just added new features to lyxass, which may be of interest for rmac: regmap - lists register usage label reg 99 - allocate next free register from pool regtop <0..31> - set top of pool Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5068529 Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DrTypo Posted June 5, 2022 Share Posted June 5, 2022 On 6/1/2022 at 3:45 PM, ggn said: It wasn't my intention to start editor wars :). My secret hope was that maybe others would submit rmac highlighting rules for other editors :D. I'm using PSPad and I made a syntax config file for it (68000 and Jaguar RISC). I don't think all the rmac directives are managed but it's already good for my uses. Jaguar assembly.ini 1 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5068776 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted June 25, 2022 Share Posted June 25, 2022 Fix "gpuobj" in my fork: There is no YPOS field. gpuobj.patch 1 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5078827 Share on other sites More sharing options...
+CyranoJ Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 7 hours ago, 42bs said: Fix "gpuobj" in my fork: There is no YPOS field. gpuobj.patch 1.23 kB · 1 download There is a ypos field, it just doesn't work on the hardware. 1 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5079033 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 3 hours ago, CyranoJ said: There is a ypos field, it just doesn't work on the hardware. I tend to say the docu is wrong and thus use the 61bits as one value is easier to handle in the source. Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5079099 Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCPCD Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 Old documentation has the field and newest documentation (for ex Jun95 [don't know if they change before]) hasn't the field in the spec. (tech v8 was based on an older documentation) It doesn't exist also in the Midsummer [jagII] documentation. In the netlist, YPOS is totaly ignored for GPU object. Don't know if it's needed to keep a field that is not finally implemented. :) 3 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5079137 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shamus Posted June 27, 2022 Share Posted June 27, 2022 Thanks for the patch Bastian. Any day you can throw away code is a good day. 1 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5079635 Share on other sites More sharing options...
42bs Posted June 27, 2022 Share Posted June 27, 2022 One more: .align <alignment> For example: .align 12 or .align 128 align.patch 1 Quote Link to comment https://forums.atariage.com/topic/234634-rmacrln/page/7/#findComment-5079657 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.