+mytek Posted May 4, 2022 Share Posted May 4, 2022 1 hour ago, StartedWith400 said: Is there a freely available KiCAD symbol for this dual connector? I don't use KiCAD, so unfortunately I am unable to help you in this regard. Although here are DXF's that you might be able to import. Dual_SIO-DA15_PCB_sym_mm.dxf Dual_SIO-DA15_PCB_sym_inch.dxf Good luck 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dropcheck Posted May 4, 2022 Share Posted May 4, 2022 4 hours ago, StartedWith400 said: Is there a freely available KiCAD symbol for this dual connector? I could do a Eagle symbol and footprint export of the standard SIO connector from Diptrace . Not sure if Kicad has the ability to import Eagle parts though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StartedWith400 Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 On 5/4/2022 at 1:46 PM, mytek said: I don't use KiCAD, so unfortunately I am unable to help you in this regard. Although here are DXF's that you might be able to import. Dual_SIO-DA15_PCB_sym_mm.dxf 133.28 kB · 6 downloads Dual_SIO-DA15_PCB_sym_inch.dxf 132.17 kB · 6 downloads Good luck Thank you, Quadrunner. Based on the mm dxf file, I created a KiCAD symbol and footprint. Note that I haven't created a board with it (so beware that it may not be accurate), but it looks like it should work. AtariSIO_dual.zip 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+mytek Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 18 minutes ago, StartedWith400 said: Thank you, Quadrunner. It's actually mytek. The name you see below the avatar image is based on how many posts the person has made. You aren't the first one to confuse one for the other, and you certainly won't be the last 20 minutes ago, StartedWith400 said: Based on the mm dxf file, I created a KiCAD symbol and footprint. Nice ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Allan Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 55 minutes ago, mytek said: It's actually mytek. The name you see below the avatar image is based on how many posts the person has made. You aren't the first one to confuse one for the other, and you certainly won't be the last Nice ? This always cracks me up when new people do this. Maybe someday Albert might consider getting rid of it (if he can.) It just causes confusion and doesn't really add to the forum (IMO.) 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+mytek Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 2 hours ago, Allan said: Maybe someday Albert might consider getting rid of it (if he can.) Agreed (fellow Quadrunner ). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathy Posted May 18, 2022 Share Posted May 18, 2022 Hello guys 2 hours ago, Allan said: Maybe someday Albert might consider getting rid of it (if he can.) It just causes confusion and doesn't really add to the forum (IMO.) 37 minutes ago, mytek said: Agreed (fellow Quadrunner ). Or he could put something in front of it, like "Title:" or "Rank:". Sincerely Mathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Stephen Posted May 18, 2022 Share Posted May 18, 2022 1 hour ago, mytek said: Agreed (fellow Quadrunner ). Just noticed, I am also in the Quadrunner gang! Must be a cool club 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_The Doctor__ Posted May 18, 2022 Share Posted May 18, 2022 It's a test, I never heard or saw people having level title difficulties before... maybe we should do away with all things that require engagement of grey matter... no more tests, labels, critical thinking of any kind. Only happy thoughts, and no typing, the chip in the brain can do the thinking and typing for us! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeventura Posted May 21, 2022 Share Posted May 21, 2022 On 5/2/2022 at 12:34 PM, cwilbar said: I have a Z-tec 1000, and I know of at least one other forum member that has one as well. I've tried two times over the years to make this work, but the one thing I have NOT been able to figure out/find is how to format (low level) the hard drive. I would think this would be a program within CP/M. And there are 2 or 3 low level formatting programs on a CP/M disk that I have (that I did get from the same person as the ATR8000 so many years ago).... but none of them seem to recognize the controller. I don't know if I'm doing something wrong, or if the Z-tec is bad, etc. I tried it with my Xebec bridge controller, I tried it with an ACB4000A bridge controller. My next step was to look into using Linux or possibly a Sun workstation to do a low level format (I know that Sun supported ACB4000A in SunOS 4.X for sure).... just don't know if you can make it do 256 byte sectors. The other idea is using Linux. I also wanted to try some early SCSI drives which are supposed to be 'compatible' with SASI. I think you have to do some SCSI commands (hopefully only once) to put this drive in that mode. Then format it to 256 byte sectors. I have some early CDC/Imprimis/Seagate (depending on when they were purchased) drives that support this. Plus I was going to try some older smaller Maxtor, Quantum, and Seagate drives. I haven't gotten back to this though. I haven't found much of any documentation on the Z-tec. One document someone sent me, and one document I have. The former appears to have been preparred by someone from a user group, and I don't know who created the other one. Neither talk about low level formatting the drive. I have yet to find anyone who knows enough or has docs to cover this part of the magic 'sauce'. I'm the other forum member who has one btw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StartedWith400 Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 On 5/17/2022 at 4:34 PM, mytek said: It's actually mytek. The name you see below the avatar image is based on how many posts the person has made. You aren't the first one to confuse one for the other, and you certainly won't be the last Nice ? Sorry about that - I was so tired I just didn't pay attention to my cut/paste line. On 5/17/2022 at 8:19 PM, Mathy said: Hello guys Or he could put something in front of it, like "Title:" or "Rank:". Sincerely Mathy This would certainly help. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StartedWith400 Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 I just got back my interposer boards for adapting AM27S19JC PLCC to DIP 16. Now I can make many (~40) data separator ROMs of U46. Now on to building the programmer. The AM27S19JC requires a different programmer than the 74S188. AM27S19JC uses Platinum-Silicide fuses, they are produced with a fusible link at each memory location storing a logic LOW, links are opened one at a time by passing current through them from a 20 volt supply. One AMD datasheet I have shows programming voltage of 21V at 200ma. Another AMD datasheet shows 21V at 250ma. 74S288 uses titanium-tungsten fuses, all PROMS are supplied with a low-logic level output condition stored at each bit location. TI PROMs require a programming voltage of 9.5V at 750 mA current. 82S123 uses nickel/chromium (nichrome) alloy fuses. Devices are supplied with all outputs at logical Low. The programming mode is evoked by raising the Vcc pin to +8.76 +/- .25V. Programming is performed one bit at a time, the word address is set up on the address inputs and the fuse to be programmed is selected by raising the output to + 17V +/- 1 V. There seem to be multiple variants/equivalents of this part: AM27S19, AM27S19A, AM27SA19, AM27LS19, DM74S288, N82S123N, TBP18S030 (these are tri-state parts. Open collector variants are: Am27S18, DM74S188, N82S23, TBP18SA030). 25ns access time. Some require 20v to program, not 21V. Note that in 1976, the part DM7488 was a mask ROM programmed at the factory with customer supplied data - "a sequenced deck of 32 standard 80·column data cards providing the information requested under data card format" - punch cards!! What a mess of confusion. I hope I don't damage too many trying to program. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+bf2k+ Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 Didn't SpartaDOS 3 have a low-level formatter? I know I had to run two format programs on my original setup with the MIO -> Adaptec 4000a hooked to a Seagate ST-251. The first one formatted and identified all the bad sectors on the drive. The second one formatted the directory structure. Maybe this is different from the previous LL Format request... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_The Doctor__ Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 Correct, however there is one level lower and that is from the drive manufacturer. We used to have those tools about but over the years who knows where such things have disappeared to, The danger with such tools were to trash the geometry/zero sectors and configuration data on the drives. The reward however was sometimes being able to rescue trashed drives or get the drive to lay down a whole new area of the drive that didn't hit weak/dying/dead sectors that the drive may have encounters or drifted into. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillC Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 (edited) The software for the ICD MIO contains software for formatting drives used with it, I used it to format a Seagate ST251 MFM drive connected to a MIO/Adaptec 4000 bridge controller BITD. This probably isn't much help with drives for the ATR8000, I don't know since I've never had one. The MIO ATR available on the 2021-12-23 preservation release has 3 versions of the formatting software(HDFMTPH(#) for different SCSI drives/controllers), one to create the directory structure(HDFMTDIR), and one to park the head when used with the Adaptec bridge controller. Edited May 25, 2022 by BillC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwilbar Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 The docs I've seen (which don't indicate how to low level format the drive to 256 byte sectors), all refer to MyDOS at the high level. I don't know how many z-tec's were sold, and I am surprised more info hasn't popped up on the internet in the number of years I've been locking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragos Posted November 4 Share Posted November 4 Did this project die ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.